jalapeno_dude
AKA Panda Judo Eel
Nope, sorry. PM me.Tyrion, JD, do you have MSN or AIM?
It can hardly be said, however, that the European Union is a single governmental body. The European Union, we must realise, is first and foremost a collection of nations - not a single one. The exact reason why the constitutional referenda failed within France and the Netherlands was due to the fact that many saw the constitution as an attempt to establish a single European state, rather than a union of allies. Though the concept of a European nation-state may in the longterm be viable, with the current situation, it does not seem likely.
We are not theoretically opposed to a constitutional framework based upon the concept of a "social contract" but we are suspicious as to what is to be included within that contract. It is France's firm position that the Constitution should not seek to regulate the domestic policies of their nations (primarily with regards to the economic policies of a single government) unless such policies directly harm other nations or harm the citizens of the same nation. We are, however, firm believes in a united European foriegn and defensive policy.
Luxembourg, of course, supports the idea of a united foreign and defensive policy.
But the EU is about much more than this. What about the Euro, a common currency? What about open borders and a shared passport? What about reduced tariffs and competitive barriers? What about the EU mandates that each nation reduce its deficit spending?
Clearly, the EU goes beyond a shared foreign policy. And clearly, it is more than just the coal and steel trade union it started out as.
It is time that we formally recognize this.