GoodEnoughForMe
n.m.s.s.
The government shuts down if a spending bill isn't passed this Friday. While this isn't a new subject, per se, the dynamics this time are different, with Democrats such as Kamala Harris and Elizabeth Warren having previously threatened to shut it down if a DACA fix is not part of the spending bill. This says nothing about CHIP, either, which while in the latest house bill, has not been a focus at all and has resulted in states shuttering the program as soon as next month if no new funding is passed.
DACA remains a popular program amongst Americans; depending on the poll, upwards of 70% want recipients to stay, and over 40% say that it is at least worth considering shuttering the government to keep Dreamers from being, you know, indefinitely detained and/or kicked out. Buuuut as with all things, Dems will be eying their generic congressional ballot lead, the fact that DACA and the rights of immigrants are consistently ranked as relatively unimportant overall by Americans (or, I should say, white Americans) and that shutting down the government is generally unpopular.
But I think there's also the argument to be made, even putting aside the relative morality of the issue, that polarization both protects Dems if they shut down the government from taking a big hit, and will probably even help a bit amongst the very progressive side of the base, Latinx consitutents, and maybe even millennials. It probably doesn't help them with the seemingly party switching urban and educated whites that are mostly just somewhat apprehensive about Trump and Republicans.
My question is; do you think Dems should do it? I don't really care if you want to argue strictly from a moral perspective (shutting down the gov would furlough workers right before Christmas. happy holidays! I guess would be a good starting counterpoint), a politically strategic perspective, both, whatever. But do you think Dems should block 60 Senate votes in order to try to get DACA resolved?
DACA remains a popular program amongst Americans; depending on the poll, upwards of 70% want recipients to stay, and over 40% say that it is at least worth considering shuttering the government to keep Dreamers from being, you know, indefinitely detained and/or kicked out. Buuuut as with all things, Dems will be eying their generic congressional ballot lead, the fact that DACA and the rights of immigrants are consistently ranked as relatively unimportant overall by Americans (or, I should say, white Americans) and that shutting down the government is generally unpopular.
But I think there's also the argument to be made, even putting aside the relative morality of the issue, that polarization both protects Dems if they shut down the government from taking a big hit, and will probably even help a bit amongst the very progressive side of the base, Latinx consitutents, and maybe even millennials. It probably doesn't help them with the seemingly party switching urban and educated whites that are mostly just somewhat apprehensive about Trump and Republicans.
My question is; do you think Dems should do it? I don't really care if you want to argue strictly from a moral perspective (shutting down the gov would furlough workers right before Christmas. happy holidays! I guess would be a good starting counterpoint), a politically strategic perspective, both, whatever. But do you think Dems should block 60 Senate votes in order to try to get DACA resolved?
Last edited: