dragonprobably
The Poster Formerly Known as MartinLuther
NinjaCow for the materials. And FOS: MartinLuther coming out and openly abstaining, draws attention to yourself a little don't you think?
Alright then, Vote: BigTin. Happy now?
NinjaCow for the materials. And FOS: MartinLuther coming out and openly abstaining, draws attention to yourself a little don't you think?
NinjaCow for the materials. And FOS: MartinLuther coming out and openly abstaining, draws attention to yourself a little don't you think?
vote: choxorn
Can someone please tell me why I'm being bandwagoned?
I'm going to agree vote: choxorn if the Ninjacow pack doesn't want him in (choxorn voted resources to ninja yesterday)
Can someone please tell me why I'm being bandwagoned?
Voting someone else for not voting while not voting yourself = Unvote, Vote: BigTin
Because choxorn keeps voting items to you?I am finding this wagon very suspect
"my vote was random, so now I'm jumping third on the bandwagon using someone else's reasoning, and I'm kinda being a hypocrite for voting Warman for voting with no good reason after claiming my last vote was just random"I would tell you, if I knew. My vote was random.
unvote; vote: ELITEOFWARMAN8
I agree with Ninja on the vote: BLAH post, and not exactly for being third on the bandwagon, but for bandwagoning with no good reason (stated at least).
Please, come up with a better lie next time.1. I messed up I meant to do this Vote: MartinLuther
Please, come up with a better lie next time.
third
How about instead of pouting, you vote for Mat and save your ass? Fair?Vote: Zack. You're the one who's looking for flimsy reasons to vote for people.
Good to know.Unless I'm missing something, I'm second.
And if I was a chicken, I'd sing the national anthem. Hypotheticals are irrelevant.And if I were scum, I would simply leave my vote where it was.
Right, I forgot that mafia never do anything that they perceive might make them look townie.No need to even move it around, I wasn't exactly going to be noticed massively for leaving it where it was, or voted, or be accused of being scum for it.
Uh, no? That was part of my point.Your right that it isn't exactly good reasoning, but is random voting a good reason?
Well, that's two for two on misguided attempts to sarcastically repeat my words back at me.There are currently two votes on me, two on Warman, two on you, two on Kennigit, two on BigTin, and one on Mat, by my count.
How about instead of pouting, you try to be reasonably coherent?
There are currently two votes on me, two on Warman, two on you, two on Kennigit, two on BigTin, and one on Mat, by my count.
How about instead of pouting, you try to be reasonably coherent?
You got it backwards: DaveShack voted for Kennigit, Kennigit didn't vote for DaveShack.