I wonder if you will be able to revert cities back into towns. I may want a settlement to be a city and antiquity and a town in modern. Seems like they talked about some cities becoming towns on age change but were not specific about it.
I wonder if you will be able to revert cities back into towns. I may want a settlement to be a city and antiquity and a town in modern. Seems like they talked about some cities becoming towns on age change but were not specific about it.
Just look at two ships. while a centerpiece is an archaelogist team. Boats behind them looks very much like Galleon to me. it doesn't look anything close to 18th Century vessels. mm they might be at the early evolutionary stage maybe?
No such thing has been spotted, at least not as a individual unit as it existed in Civ 6. The equivilent ranged unit in this game appears to be an anti-tank cannon.
No. No more silly pseudo units like that. Which I like more.
having AT Gun being the most advanced ranged unit in this game is more acceptable though, even Antitank Guns never has been organized as separate regiments. It is still acceptable evolution of field artillery even, at leasts because the name is descriptive
This is the most advanced Field Artillery as it could be in this game. serving both functions of Antitank weaponry and Fire Support Field Artillery. Did US Army or British Army has similiar large calibre Dual Purpose Fieldguns like this?
The Soviet Army formed Antitank Artillery Brigades starting in t he spring of 1943, and had over 60 of them by the end of World War Two. Each consisted of 3 regiments, all towed by all-wheel drive trucks (American Lendc Lease vehicles) and had a total of 60 to 72 guns each, ranging from 45mm to 100mm.
As A. B. Shirokorad details in his book Artilleriya v Velikoi Otechestvennoi voine (Artillery in the Great Patriotic War), the Russian and later the Soviet Army both used a high percentage of Divisional Cannon, starting with the M1902 76.2mm piece and ending with the 100mm BS-3 which were largely used in direct fire - making them very good antitank artillery as well. The reason was not that they anticipated tanks in 1902, though, it was because direct fire at targets you could see with the naked eye required much less ttraining and technical skill than firing indirectly against targets out of sight that required calculating range and azimuth.
Given that the Russian Army had 50% illiterate or 'semi-literate' draftees in 1913 and the Soviet Army had 50% of its draftees in 1940 with less than 6 years of formal education, simplifying the training and technical requirements was pretty much a requirement for the Russians throughout the 20th century, regardless of what it did to the effectiveness of the military units.
Is this the Obshchina? I don't think it's a plantation, but it could be. There's also a partial view of one in the lower corner of the scene where the Hermitage is completed.
The Soviet Army formed Antitank Artillery Brigades starting in t he spring of 1943, and had over 60 of them by the end of World War Two. Each consisted of 3 regiments, all towed by all-wheel drive trucks (American Lendc Lease vehicles) and had a total of 60 to 72 guns each, ranging from 45mm to 100mm.
As A. B. Shirokorad details in his book Artilleriya v Velikoi Otechestvennoi voine (Artillery in the Great Patriotic War), the Russian and later the Soviet Army both used a high percentage of Divisional Cannon, starting with the M1902 76.2mm piece and ending with the 100mm BS-3 which were largely used in direct fire - making them very good antitank artillery as well. The reason was not that they anticipated tanks in 1902, though, it was because direct fire at targets you could see with the naked eye required much less ttraining and technical skill than firing indirectly against targets out of sight that required calculating range and azimuth.
Given that the Russian Army had 50% illiterate or 'semi-literate' draftees in 1913 and the Soviet Army had 50% of its draftees in 1940 with less than 6 years of formal education, simplifying the training and technical requirements was pretty much a requirement for the Russians throughout the 20th century, regardless of what it did to the effectiveness of the military units.
Did NATO (or Pre-Nato armies) has anything equivalent to BS3 10cm field gun? What is US Army equivalent that's called 'Guns' rather than 'Howitzers' and has long barrels and same antitank capabilities?
View attachment 715019
Is this the Obshchina? I don't think it's a plantation, but it could be. There's also a partial view of one in the lower corner of the scene where the Hermitage is completed.
Just look at two ships. while a centerpiece is an archaelogist team. Boats behind them looks very much like Galleon to me. it doesn't look anything close to 18th Century vessels. mm they might be at the early evolutionary stage maybe?
The unit in the foreground is presumably the Explorer, which seems to be the Civ7 version of the Archaeologist and is available with the Natural History civic early in the Modern Age.
That there are also Galleons (tier 3 Exploration naval units) in the clip could mean that Galleons don't automatically upgrade to Ironclads at the start of the Age, or it could just be that the clip is not from a real game but rather something edited together specifically for the video.
The unit in the foreground is presumably the Explorer, which seems to be the Civ7 version of the Archaeologist and is available with the Natural History civic early in the Modern Age.
That there are also Galleons (tier 3 Exploration naval units) in the clip could mean that Galleons don't automatically upgrade to Ironclads at the start of the Age, or it could just be that the clip is not from a real game but rather something edited together specifically for the video.
But it is a galleon that has a triangular sail rigged from spar to mast directly. but no gaff riggings at the mizzenmasta.
It might be Mid or Late 17th Century Galleons when it began to evolve into Enlightenment Era Tall Ships (Frigates and Ships of the Line, both of which originally began with the same galleon hull before evolving further to be even faster and to accept even more guns, and Ships of The Line of the 18th-19th Century (Age III) are all bigger.
It's a different model to the ones we've seen before, and I notice there is a conspicuous lack of crew on deck. My guess is that it's an embarked unit, probably for the Explorer. (The Scout also has a sailing vessel as its Modern embarked graphic).
It's a different model to the ones we've seen before, and I notice there is a conspicuous lack of crew on deck. My guess is that it's an embarked unit, probably for the Explorer. (The Scout also has a sailing vessel as its Modern embarked graphic).
I agree. Machine gunners should be integrated into the standard infantry graphics to represent how they actually functioned, same as soldiers using portable AT weapons.
At the very least we have units using manned machine guns on vehicles like with the Marines unit.
This is a must. Tier 2 Infantry should graphically represented with an MG support in addition to standard riflemen. grouped in one hex.
one MG team (2 men) and the rests being riflemen.
And tier 3, a bazooka team (of two men) is added, replacing two riflemen in the same element, also half of the remainder carried SMGs.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.