Small Observations General Thread (things not worth separate threads)

^ And how did Antitank Field Guns are organized? did Western Allies and Germany follows the same model as Soviet Union to make a full regiment of Antitank Gun or what?
Last post on this Off Topic:

Neither the British nor the Americans ever formed any permanent antitank units larger than a battalion.

The US Army, in fact, was designed to operate with very small infantry divisions - containing no tank, antitank, antiaircraft units and only a reconnaissance company, but supported by a mass of separate antitank (called Tank Destroyers), antiaircraft (both light with 40mm and heavy with 90mm guns), armored cavalry, tank, artillery and engineer battalions that could be attached or assigned as needed. The only larger 'units' were Artillery, Engineer and Armored Cavalry Group HQ that provided better command and control over those units, but there was no such thing as a 'Tank Destroyer Group' HQ.
 
Just a random ramble... As many have said, it seems likely based on where the modern age leaves off that there will be a major expansion at some point to a 4th future age, and that seems ok and all. I'm just not a fan of the info/atomic era stuff when playing civ; I love the older stuff. It would have been very cool if they expanded backwards and created a pre-antiquity age. This would have allowed for separating civs like Rome from Sumeria and could have broken up Egypt into two ages, which would be more authentic for how long it was around.
 
In the new dev diary, the two unknown leader slots can be seen. Frederick the Great correlates to the one left of Harriet Tubman. The last leader is alphabetically between Isabella and Lafayette.
someone on reddit guessed isembard kingdom brunel, and i just got this feeling maybe this + frederick is the answer
 
lataus (2).jpeg


Kitchener would fit alphabetically
 
We can narrow it down a little bit. I mean, given Civ7, they have some sort of French connection. Jean-Luc Picard?
That's not much of a French connection TBH. :p
 
I asked a question in the Siam thread, but it got lost in the flow I think... I'll ask again here

Is there a nuance between being SUZERAIN to a city-state and being ALLIED with a city-states ? Siam's description sure makes it feel like they're not the same ! Are they one and the same ?
 
I asked a question in the Siam thread, but it got lost in the flow I think... I'll ask again here

Is there a nuance between being SUZERAIN to a city-state and being ALLIED with a city-states ? Siam's description sure makes it feel like they're not the same ! Are they one and the same ?
I don't think so. It's just that "an Allied City-State" is a briefer way to say "A City-State which you are the Suzerain of"
 
1737036760853.png

From the IGN video posted today
 
Nookrium goes through all the game setup options, only map sizes available were tiny, small, and standard :/

There is an "Age Length" setting, which "determines how much age progress is required to complete an age", also "Disaster Intensity" setting and "Crises" checkbox (!)
 
Back
Top Bottom