Sweeslamistan

White supremacist? So if you want to preserve European cultures it makes you a white supremacist? Because current Swedish government is doing everything to erase Swedish native culture and replace it by new Islamic culture. They want to learn everything from immigrants - check this video:

[searching the video, wait]

They consider their native European culture as something to be ashamed of. Not considering your own culture as shameful is being a "supremacist"?

Pretty much.

I reckon every ethnic group has a right to self preservation and a homeland. What countries like Sweden are doing is forgoing their right as a people to have that security. Hopefully Sweden will transform itself into a Northen European Islamic State, than the rest of Europe will get a loud and impossible to ignore warning for the future.
 
So if you want to preserve European cultures it makes you a white supremacist?

What makes you want to preserve European culture? I've always wondered.
 
You responded before I found the video - OK, here it is:

=================================

White supremacist? So if you want to preserve European cultures it makes you a white supremacist? Because current Swedish government is doing everything to erase native Swedish culture and replace it by new Islamic culture. They want to learn everything from immigrants - check this video:

From 2:43 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tk4uDNSPlXE#t=159

"(...) And forget about an American-style melting pot in which immigrants will some day learn to become Swedish. That's a racist idea too. Joving says Swedes are supposed to learn from immigrants and not the other way around: - 'Assimilation is completely out of question.' - 'Who say's that assimilation is completely out of question?' - 'I mean everybody, in all mainstream political parties, media, platforms, etc. they would laugh, laugh about this idea, the word assimilation is a Nazi word in Sweden. (...)"

They consider their native European culture as something to be ashamed of. Not considering your own culture as shameful is being a "supremacist"?

Even in the Middle Ages Europe was by no means a "backwater" as some people today try to insist.

Any Gothic cathedral, city or castle in Europe can easily compete with, if not surpass, any of Non-European architecture of the same time.
 
What makes you want to preserve European culture?

Being a European, for example. And the fact that Europe is the continent which contributed most to, and shaped, the world as we know it.

And what makes you want Europe to adopt the culture of Muslim Africa or the culture of the Middle East ???

If they come to Europe, they should assimilate and adapt. Why do people immigrate to Europe? Because it is such a great and rich continent.

But why do people who hate Europe and are jealous of European culture come to Europe? Because they want to change or destroy Europe.
 
White supremacist? So if you want to preserve European cultures it makes you a white supremacist? Because current Swedish government is doing everything to erase native Swedish culture and replace it by new Islamic culture. They want to learn everything from immigrants - check this video:

From 2:43 - https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=tk4uDNSPlXE#t=159

"(...) And forget about an American-style melting pot in which immigrants will some day learn to become Swedish. That's a racist idea too. Joving says Swedes are supposed to learn from immigrants and not the other way around: - 'Assimilation is completely out of question.' - 'Who say's that assimilation is completely out of question?' - 'I mean everybody, in all mainstream political parties, media, platforms, etc. they would laugh, laugh about this idea, the word assimilation is a Nazi word in Sweden. (...)"

They consider their native European culture as something to be ashamed of. Not considering your own culture as shameful is being a "supremacist"?

Even in the Middle Ages Europe was by no means a "backwater" as some people today try to insist.

Any Gothic cathedral, city or castle in Europe can easily compete with, if not surpass, any of Non-European architecture of the same time.

Except you're not for preserving swedish culture, you just don't want Muslim immigration. Preserving "native european culture" is different from being against immigration.

Do you seriously believe that at some point, Sweden will become a Caliphate or Majority Muslim country? That's insanity, no less bigoted or mad then those that worried the immigration of the Italians, The Irish, The Jews, The Polish, The Romanians, Bulgarians, Africans, Russians etc would result in the destruction of their "culture".
 
you just don't want Muslim immigration.

Sweden is not really my business, but I didn't say that I don't want Muslim immigration at all.

All I said is that I want Muslim immigrants to adopt European culture, values and to assimilate.

Do you seriously believe that at some point, Sweden will become a Caliphate or Majority Muslim country? That's insanity

It is not insanity at all. According to some projections Muslims will be half of the population of Sweden by year 2050.

This provided that current annual rate of Muslim immigration will continue. Some Swedes are also converting to Islam.

no less bigoted or mad then those that worried the immigration of the Italians, The Irish, The Jews, The Polish, The Romanians, Bulgarians, Africans, Russians etc would result in the destruction of their "culture".

I live in Poland and I don't like emigration from Poland, so as far as my opinion counts, you can ban Poles from entering your countries.
 
Well that takes time, best to wait, not going to happen immediately.
 
Being a European, for example. And the fact that Europe is the continent which contributed most to the world as we know it.
I'm a European. Doesn't make me want to preserve European culture. And why does an historic contribution (a bit of a mixed bag there in any case, let's be honest), mean you want to preserve it now?

And what makes you want Europe to adopt culture of Africa or culture of the Middle East ???
I don't. I simply have no particular view on the subject.

If they come to Europe, they should assimilate and adapt. Why do people immigrate to Europe? Because it is such a great and rich continent.

But why do people who hate Europe and hate European culture come to Europe? To change Europe apparently.

No. I don't see it that way at all. Immigrants anywhere are going to assimilate and adapt. To some varying degree no doubt. But assimilation is inevitable.

People come to Europe because it's significantly richer, at the moment, and they seek a better standard of living for their children and grandchildren. It's really nothing to do with it being great.

People who hate Europe and Europeans don't come to Europe.

A sizeable minority of immigrants who come to Europe, become disillusioned when they can't find work. Or their children can't find work. At a time of global economic difficulty largely caused by the rich Western banking system.

Aren't you disillusioned with the same things?
 
What's not going to happen immediately?

I'm a European. Doesn't make me want to preserve European culture.

Well, that's a real pity.

And why does an historic contribution (a bit of a mixed bag there in any case, let's be honest)

European contribution for the world has been mostly positive.

Sure, we did bad things too, but they were not worse than things done by other people, who were just less efficient in doing them.

The current stage of development of the world is mostly due to Europe.

Had there been no European colonization of, for example, Australia, do you think Australia would have been as developed as it is today?

Immigrants anywhere are going to assimilate and adapt.

Not if you apply policies like Sweden, which consider assimilation as something bad.

A sizeable minority of immigrants who come to Europe, become disillusioned when they can't find work.

And that's a reason to stop immigration. Or maybe you want immigrants to flood into Europe even though there are no jobs for them here ???

What about jobs for young Europeans, native non-immigrant ones ???

People come to Europe because it's significantly richer, at the moment, and they seek a better standard of living for their children and grandchildren. It's really nothing to do with it being great.

So rich is not great ??? A mud hut is better than a modern apartment ??? I see...

At a time of global economic difficulty largely caused by the rich Western banking system.

So let's abolish banks, money, civilization - and go back to living in mud huts and caves.

There will be no economic difficulties other than "how do I kill that deer with a spear".
 
To be honest I don't know if Sweden is on some kind of death march, but there are a few things I'd like to point out.

To my knowledge, the immigration laws hasn't changed much lately. The government (centre-right, lost the election 3 days ago) has opened up for some work immigration but otherwise the laws has not been liberalized. There certainly has not been any "opening the floodgates". When politicians point out benefits with immigration, it's probably meant as counter argument and should not be read as a push to increase immigration. In the end it's about helping people in need. The current immigration laws is probably based on some UN principle Sweden has abided to.

Keep in mind that refugee immigration, to its nature, comes in waves. There is a huge surge in the beginning which eventually slows to a trickle (depending on the cause). Sudden increase in refugee numbers doesn't mean the laws has been laxer.

Regarding "media hiding the truth" - which 2014 would mean hiding the Internet: reporting the background and birth place of any person mentioned in a news article would be ridiculous. Try it on a regular newspaper. Soccer players, artists, writers, bus drivers, all the people involved in something news worthy. Every article, every page. Great reading that would be.

Also, Sweden doesn't have the lowest birth rate in Europe. It's low, but pretty average compared to other EU countries.
 
Some people of this thread seems to be spreading the typical Swedish democrats myths about immigration, so much hate, so conspiratory
 
Voices from Sweden are much appreciated. Most of YT videos, etc., about problems in Sweden seem to come from other countries.

===========================

It is harder to integrate people who look non-mainstream in a given country. They noticed this also in the USA:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Nzj_3yfka1U#t=857

"(...) The European immigrants who came during the great wave had an advantage in terms of assimilation that we don't really talk about much anymore, and that is that they looked a lot like natives. Of course there are some differences, people could look 'noticeably Italian', some people could look 'noticeably Irish', but the differences were small, for sure. In many cases they were non-existent. So once you had immigrants or children of immigrants who began to 'act like Americans', so to speak, they essentially blended in, they were indistinguishable from other Americans, to the point where it is difficult to know if you were Polish or English, or something like that. And that's an advantage that the Hispanics generally do not have. Hispanics of course tend to be a mixture of Spanish and American Indian descent. Most of the immigrants we receive tend to be more in the American Indian end of that spectrum. (...) Hispanic immigrants usually look distinctly and non-White. (...)"

Many of Muslim immigrants in Europe - for example these from countries like Somalia - also look very distinctly here.
 
What makes you want to preserve European culture? I've always wondered.
I don't even know what "European culture" is to begin with. Racism and complaining? No reasons why Asians shouldn't be capable of that.
 
Asians are also among the racist folks of Earth. Just to mention Japan during WW2.

Singapore's former prime minister - Lee Kuan Yew - is known as a "race realist".

I don't even know what "European culture" is to begin with. Racism and complaining?

So complaining is Pan-European ??? I thought it was only typical here in the central-east.

But seriously - you don't know what "European culture" is because in fact it surrounds us from all sides.

European way of life - or at least some of its elements - has been adopted also by many Non-Europeans.

American culture of course also counts as European because the USA is a recent European offshoot.

Europeans settled 2 continents almost entirely - North America and Australia - and 2 more partially - Latin America and Asian part of Russia. But in North Africa, Central and South Asia they actually lost some ground.
 
American culture of course also counts as European because the USA is a recent European offshoot.
I resent the statement that American culture is the same as "European" culture, due to the implications that Americans are uncivilized colonials who haven't been able to develop a distinct and coherent identity in the last 200 years.
 
At least you get to have a culture. African-Americans, Asian-Americans and American Indians are apparently devoid of any independent culture whatsoever.
 
At least you get to have a culture. African-Americans, Asian-Americans and American Indians are apparently devoid of any independent culture whatsoever.
They are as American as me, so of course they have a culture.
Silly Europeans stuck in ethnic-based identities and cultures!
 
We American Indians do have a culture, but it isn't a definable in your face kind of culture like the American one. Unlike other cultures, the main thread connecting Indians abroad to their homeland is not language or religion but Bollywood, which could be classified as a religion in its own right. Of course Bollywood is also out of touch with reality and formulaic for me to enjoy it, but my patents love it.
 
Back
Top Bottom