The CFC Mafia (Game Thread)

[Bratmon]

I'll ask the RNGod who to vote for next.
Winston Hughes

 

[Catharsis]

Hold on, me old cabbages, how about this:

WoG: SilentConfusion

Death Threats: Zack

(remake: that's a request to WoG SilentConfusion, reasoning being that he's been absent from the thread since day 1, and a vote to lynch Zack)

EDIT: damn you Kennigit, how dare you come to the same conclusions as me and cause me to crosspost, soon the death threats will be headed your way!

 

[Seon]

Cat and kennegit smart... SilentConfusion

bestrfcplayer

WoG: SilentConfusion

 

[Zack]

Is the option to WoG inactives open today? That would take care of SilentConfusion for us.

Otherwise, I would really appreciate this scanner coming forward to me in private. I mean, I did get King F lynched, so you shouldn't really be afraid. I'll happily change my vote if you do so.

Because otherwise I can easily see this as Zack naming random joe schmo inactive who won't come to the thread to defend himself. Buys a day, lynches a person, and tomorrow he can frame another person as the scanner that would have "lied to him."

Honestly, I haven't seen Zack do much innocent-friendly so far. And I guess I'm mad he tried to kill me 2 days in a row for no reason. Pie.

Wait, so why are you voting for me? I can think of three reasons, all silly:

1. I publicly announced that I scanned someone as mafia. I said that if SC turns out to be innocent, lynch me tomorrow by all means.
   
2. Some people voted me items. I don't know why, and I haven't even won any items... so I don't understand this point, either.
   
3. King Flevance told me he thought Kennigit was innocent and Duke Blackstone a killer. Now this one, I really don't understand.

 

[Arakhor]

That works for me.

WoG: SilentConfusion; Lynch: Zack. Otherwise, stick with SilentConfusion.

Sorry Zack, but you have come across as scummy.

 

[GenMarshall]

Vote: SilentConfusion

 

[bestrfcplayer]

bestrfcplayer

Why so hard on me Cull?

 

[Duke Blackstone]

vote: Zach
y? cause he dosent want anyone to scan me. i demand a scan. You can give it to Kenngit or Seon or someone, or whoever you trust, and they can post it. Please leave my strength off of it, for obvious reasons.

WOG: SilentConfusion

 

[Catharsis]

To be honest, Zack, I'm not sure what the original argument against you was (it's probably hidden in one of Earthling's posts, like a plum hidden in a Christmas pie, but man, sorry Earthling but your posts are difficult to read - I couldn't make head nor tail of them).

But if I were scum in your situation, with millions of votes piling up on top of me, and I had an inactive teammate, I'd definitely give some thought to fake-claiming scanner and throwing said inactive teammate under the bus. This seems more likely because there are a number of legitimate scan-targets in this thread, but Silent "WoGbait" Confusion isn't really one of them.

Long story short, I think both you and SC are mafia.

But I don't want to risk losing a scanner over my gut feeling. Let the eyes of the whole thread be upon you, z4ckdabeast! And meanwhile, Zack Duke Blackstone

Oh yeah, and I'm serious about this, guys: Has anyone had anything stolen from them, besides Kennigit? New day, new chance to answer if you have...

 

[Kennigit]

Zack

SilentConfusion

My bad about the mafia/killer.

Zack I have no idea what you are talking about. I have specifically said a few arguments against you

#1: for absolutely no reason at all, you voted to lynch me. Twice. For no reason at all, you voted to lynch link. And as for your demeanor towards me, it's been scummy. You PMed me and said I was talking to a confessed killer ATPG. You said I was rambling and made no sense whatsoever. You insisted that me saying I was rich made me mafia. You said I had to bribe someone to tell choxorn I was innocent (granted that was hilarious, but still). You took a PM at the end of a hefty PM discussion and posted it in the thread trying to frame me.
#2 (the voting possy)--I have stated that I felt there was a voting possy specifically centered around you. Often masons/mafia will vote with each other. I am asking why, on things like day 1, wideyewanderer, choxorn, and bestrfc specifically voted for you for no apparent reason. But it appeared not to be random as that voting block (minus choxorn) continued to stick together.

Other posters may not be so alarmed, but specifically on day 3 the exact same voting possy all voted to lynch me and give you the moniter. Day 4, an opportunity to lynch 2people, you voted 2 innocents.

Now you claim *publicly* to be a scanner when I was pretty much the only one still voting for you. I simple PM could have sufficed. Well, I guess you wouldn't mind any other scan results of yours posted.

@catharsis--I guess the deodarant got stolen or something. And my pie.

edit--is anyone going to vouch for Zack? That would be interesting to me.

 

[Zack]

#1: for absolutely no reason at all, you voted to lynch me. Twice. For no reason at all, you voted to lynch link. And as for your demeanor towards me, it's been scummy. You PMed me and said I was talking to a confessed killer ATPG. You said I was rambling and made no sense whatsoever. You insisted that me saying I was rich made me mafia. You said I had to bribe someone to tell choxorn I was innocent (granted that was hilarious, but still). You took a PM at the end of a hefty PM discussion and posted it in the thread trying to frame me.

I voted to lynch you because you said you had no problem giving money to mafia, and that you planned to do it. I never said being rich made you mafia. I didn't say you didn't make any sense, either. I said link seemed scummy because whenever I tried to ask him about his role in the chat, all he said was "I'm not mafia."

#2 (the voting possy)--I have stated that I felt there was a voting possy specifically centered around you. Often masons/mafia will vote with each other. I am asking why, on things like day 1, wideyewanderer, choxorn, and bestrfc specifically voted for you for no apparent reason. But it appeared not to be random as that voting block (minus choxorn) continued to stick together.

Other posters may not be so alarmed, but specifically on day 3 the exact same voting possy all voted to lynch me and give you the moniter. Day 4, an opportunity to lynch 2people, you voted 2 innocents.

I honestly have no idea why they're voting me stuff. Why don't you ask them? I already stated my reasons for voting Earthling. He's annoying and I was bribed to do so (when his fate was already decided, I might add).

Now you claim publicly to be a scanner. Well, I guess you wouldn't mind any other scan results of yours posted.

Yes, I want to post my list of confirmed innocents, so the mafia can target them.

 

[Catharsis]

remake: To be honest, I think you should introduce a WoG policy on your own. Don't make us decide your rules, because we all have a vested interest in this game. None of us are impartial, like you are.

Like now, we're just using the WoG as a second vote, which isn't its proper use at all. There should be a policy, but it shouldn't be up to us.

(If you feel guilty about WoGing people, remember that it's them who signed up for your game and then disappeared into the aether, taking their roles with them. You owe them nothing. )

@catharsis--I guess the deodarant got stolen or something. And my pie.

If the deodorant got stolen then we have a shortlist of two:

During the morning most of them went to the bar. While there ICBM and romanichine had the following conversation... "Forget that for now, I took Zack's deodorant."

But I was under the impression that it was just filler. If anyone's had anything stolen, please, speak up.

No-one stole your pie, it is disgusting and it smells of maths teacher.

 

[Zack]

I don't have an actual deodorant item, at least that I am aware of. *sniffs armpits* Nope, I don't!

 

[Kennigit]

I'm not going to turn this into a fight. And I don't want to post PMs in the thread. But you did specifically say that I had ramblings and said I met with ATPG behind the scenes as your 2nd PM to me.

Anyways, we should wait for remake20 to clarify if the WoG is an option. Pie.

 

[Zack]

I'm not going to turn this into a fight. And I don't want to post PMs in the thread. But you did specifically say that I had ramblings and said I met with ATPG behind the scenes as your 2nd PM to me.

ATPG came into a chatroom and said you had contacted him in private after he claimed SK in the thread.

 

[Takhisis]

Cat and kennegit smart...

lurker's comment: Cat, yes, cat iz smart. Kennigit iz not smart. he say I always mafia. I not mafia.

 

[Kennigit]

It's too late takhisis. Look at post 182. The pie has been baked and consumed. Had a hint of nutmeg in it.

 

[Takhisis]

We shall never surrender anyway.

 

[Romanichine]

remake: To be honest, I think you should introduce a WoG policy on your own. Don't make us decide your rules, because we all have a vested interest in this game. None of us are impartial, like you are.

Like now, we're just using the WoG as a second vote, which isn't its proper use at all. There should be a policy, but it shouldn't be up to us.

Amen to that, birdie.

Remake, if you don't want to use a strict WOG policy, like 3 inactive days, maybe you could go for 5? It's getting ridiculous to keep players who have not participated after five days.

***

My feeling is also that Zack could very well be bussing an inactive teammate to gain some favor. Really, why would he go scanning SilentConfusion, who has been inactive since day 1? Nah, he would be scanning someone else, unless there's hidden info that we don't know about.

However (call me a fool, heh) but I will vote SilentConfusion because right or wrong, we lynch a mafia today! Either Zack is bussing his inactive partner, or he's telling the truth and he truly scanned SilentConfusion as mafia.

We can decide tomorrow if Zack is also mafia. Maybe we will have more insight on the matter.

vote: SilentConfusion

(** Note: I know there's also a possibility that Zack is lying and SilentConfusion is not mafia, but I'm discarding this scenario. Zack knows perfectly well that he would get lynched next day for lying, and I think he would have picked another target than an inactive player, as losing an inactive player will not hurt us at all. )

***

potato

 

[Romanichine]

Btw, Zack: Why did you scan SilentConfusion?

He does not look like an appealing scanning target to me.

***

green peppers