I mean, my family has been administrating Upper Egypt for some generations already, but being called the Counselor of Upper Egypt sounds awkward. Emir of Upper Egypt seems better (Emir is the only example my mind can come up with, maybe Sultan too, but as my knowledge on muslin topics really sucks I have no idea if they could be used or if they are histotically accurate or whatever).
Our story is an alternate history of what would have happened if the Muwaiyah did not fight with Ali Ibn Abi Talib, which caused the first Fitnah for the Muslim nation in 661 A.D. Read more about this here:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_Fitna
The titles of Emirs and Sultans, and the notion of hereditary rule and feudalism were not prevalent until Muwaiyah defeated and killed Ali ibn Abi Talib and not only established himself as the Caliph, but made the position hereditary by passing on his powers to his son, whereas during the Rashidun Caliphate,
the Caliph was elected, and governors were chosen according to merit. Read more about this
here. Prior to that, the
Rightly guided caliphs strongly opposed favouring their kin to other people (With the exception of Uthman Ibn Affan to a certain extent). Umar ibn al-Khattab even made his family live with him in relative poverty to drive the message home that he is in no way a king, and he would never prefer his kin over his subjects.
There is a certain narration claiming that Prophet Muhammad said something similar to, "Even if Fatimah (His daughter) was caught stealing, she would receive punishment", again implying that hereditary rule or preference has no place in Islam.
Because in our alternate history the First Fitnah never happened, the Ummah remained with the political administration and practices of the Rashidun Caliphate. That is, electing Caliphs and having rulers that are generally accepted by the ruled.
Governors are not chosen on the basis of heredity. You being the governor of Upper Egypt, you represent the
Majlis that is made up of members elected by people of various groups and tribes that make up Upper Egypt. You are not an individual, rather you are the voice of the parliament of Upper Egypt that voices its decisions to the Caliph, so that the Caliph receives the
Shura he needs to properly govern according to the command of the Qur'an.
Even my position as Caliph. I simply represent the Caliph elected by all of the Majalis (Plural for parliament) that meet up with each other annually. However, unlike most liberal democracies, a Caliph is elected only by the Majalis of the Muslim nation, and election of a Caliph only occur with the death of the preceding Caliph. However, outside of some military control, the Caliph is merely a figurehead, while most of the decision-making is given to the local provinces.
Some of those methods of governance have not been executed by the Rashidun Caliphate, but it is what I envision a functioning Islamic Ummah to look like.
Sorry if this is all a bit confusing.
In short, we have not recreating history, but extending the life of the Rashidun Caliphate. If you have more questions, I am happy to answer them here to give better context for you and the readers.