LightSpectra
me autem minui
Eh. I guess so. But that's by European standards; Europeans consider American Democrats to be right-wing and Republicans to be far-right, whereas Americans would think the Partido Popular is economically left-wing.
In hindsight, I could have worked less hard to get where I am at today. I didn't really start getting successful until I stopped believing in the hard work myth.
those dont really exist at all but in label.
The Dutch ChristenUnie (Christian Union) is actually such a party. They are quite small though.
I'm sorry, but I chuckled inside when you referred to a Dutch party as 'quite small'. It implied that there are some that are large - and to me (Nieuw Amsterdammer that I am), everything Dutch is small.
except for your engineering and shipping firms. Those guys can move the earth. Literally.
But seriously, when you say that they are small, do you mean that they have a small following in the Netherlands, or that they are weak in power? Also, is the party represented in any other nearby nations?
you know, if that coal miner has a good idea, and like, starts a business and gets really really successfull he can totally be a ceo himself one day.
Really disgusts me that the Republican Party is in power on the backs of Christians despite their economic platform being essentially social Darwinist.
A CEO may not work 200 times harder than the average worker, but he is 200 times smarter. People get paid not only for how hard they work, but how smart they are. You guys minimize how difficult it is to be a CEO. Last time I checked there are no CEO's posting here. Oh right, they are working at making their companies profitable. 'nuff said.
source:chief executives at America's 350 biggest companies were paid 231 times as much as the average private-sector worker in 2011. This ratio, which includes the value of share options, has begun to rise again after falling during the recession (see chart). This disparity matters more in bad times when the average Joe is feeling the pinch. Wages in America have been flat for years while CEO pay has risen substantially, sometimes with little relation to company performance.
Then how do you explain this?
http://media.economist.com/sites/de...s/graphic-detail/epi_ceo_worker_pay_ratio.png
source:
http://www.economist.com/blogs/graphicdetail/2012/05/ratio-ceo-worker-compensation
So why were CEOs pre-1997 so much relatively more stupider than the ones we have now? And doesn't the bolded line sort of imply that the intelligence of the CEO is also sometimes not correlated with company performance? I think your premise is wrong.
What you freakin' liberals don't realize is that if everyone just worked smarter we'd all be CEOs.
Solution is rise up and kill all the bourgeoisie.
Oh I'm not arguing that there is a serious pay imbalance. There is, and it's pretty easy to measure. You can't argue the facts that there is more of a pay inbalance than there was years earlier.
Solution? I'm not sure other than unionize....
Then all the wealth falls to their bratty children.![]()
Kill the children too. Leave no stone unturned, no fascist capitalist left unsmoten.
Actually, I support your right to that smiley. Many conservatives would want to grab it from you because of your felonious past.Make my day.
(why aren't the liberals here campaigning agaisnt this smiley?)