Manfred Belheim
Moaner Lisa
- Joined
- Sep 11, 2009
- Messages
- 8,633
Then their so-called "pro-life" stance is nothing but a sham. If you're going to proclaim yourself as pro-life, you should be in favor of making sure that once the baby is born, it's not going to be afflicted with illnesses or death due to malnutrition/starvation, preventable diseases, inadequate access to doctors and hospitals, and that it has the necessities such as shelter (ie. properly insulated, not run-down, not rife with toxic mold, has proper heating, plumbing, clean water, electricity). And that doesn't even include the necessity of access to adequate schools, literacy (ie. access to libraries), and safe places for recreation.
Nope. That's like saying you can't be against murder without being massively concerned with the future lives of anyone who surived a thwarted murder attempt. Also, again, you seem to be asserting that anyone who takes the pro-life stance is necessarily against pretty much all social programs or humanitarian acts. Is that the case?
Sorry, but if I don't want you to be murdered, that doesn't mean I'm obligated to fight for your public libraries and parks. And it absolutely definitely doesn't mean that if you were in imminent danger of being murdered that I should concentrate on your libraries and parks as the primary method of saving your life.