Three questions for the opponents of Ron Paul

[kramerfan86]

Yes to all three, but that hardly means his ideas are a particularly healthy way to address any of the issues he raises.

 

[Ziggy Stardust]

When are we going to discover the cunning plan that lays behind these 3 innocent looking questions?

 

[Antilogic]

When are we going to discover the cunning plan that lays behind these 3 innocent looking questions?

Presumably, either we don't know about currency crises, etc. and we are bluffed into thinking Ron Paul's ideasa are the best ways to tackle it, OR we do and we support Ron Paul.

As a non-Paulian, I'm just guessing.

 

[ParadigmShifter]

I guess we'll find out after Hillary's 2nd term.

 

[Cutlass]

I love that he's not playing to the militaristic aspects of the Republican Party, and he actually engages the other candidates on stage in real debates and not pander-races. Then he starts talking about money and I go all slack-jawed as my earballs are assaulted with utter nonsense.

Paul really is a Luddite on the subject of money. He learned what he learned in the 19th century and he's not going to learn more.

 

[Antilogic]

Paul really is a Luddite on the subject of money. He learned what he learned in the 19th century and he's not going to learn more.

Agreed, I was just trying to express that while ham-handedly forcing a neologism from the FX Network into my post. Didn't work out too well, in retrospect.

I've never heard him comment directly on liquidity traps, which is why I'm curious to hear what he thinks about them. Any links?

 

[Cutlass]

Agreed, I was just trying to express that while ham-handedly forcing a neologism from the FX Network into my post. Didn't work out too well, in retrospect.

I've never heard him comment directly on liquidity traps, which is why I'm curious to hear what he thinks about them. Any links?

You can look at his official campaign web site. But other that that it seems to be getting more and more confusing what Paul says and what people say for him.

 

[Camikaze]

Moderator Action: We already have a Ron Paul thread, and there doesn't seem to be enough discussion value in this to warrant another one.