EgonSpengler
Deity
- Joined
- Jun 26, 2014
- Messages
- 12,260
Well, the Defense Department does respond to natural disasters, and is among the few government agencies to acknowledge the threat posed by climate change (and not just under the Trump administration, if you need to frame things in terms of partisan politics, this has been going on for years). But the key word in my post - for me - was 'priorities.' It's a national, maybe a cultural, problem, and while it is political, it's not just political. I don't think the media, for example, talks enough about heat waves as natural disasters, but as unpleasant weather (the guy on my local NPR station can't stop talking about whether the temps at night will be good for sleeping). That's probably because it's kind of a "slow motion" disaster and there isn't a lot of property damage, so it's hard to make it look cool (pardon the pun) on television.Why compare the number of deaths by heat wave to the number of deaths by terrorism? It's a comparison that makes no sense other than to awkwardly shoehorn in some political statement about US defense spending. The comparison and your mention of the DoD is especially awkward considering dealing with natural disasters is not one of the DoD's responsibilities. Natural disasters and the relief efforts associated with them are the responsibility of DHS.
Funding is of course a big issue in any disaster response or preparation, and the Defense Department is one of the most well-funded and buys a lot of big-ticket items, so whenever I find something that could be addressed with a giant pile of money, I tend to look at them first. Using Home Depot and Wikipedia as sources, cutting the cost of a single Virginia-class Attack Sub could fund around 13.5 million in-window air conditioners, at retail. If you prefer to look at things from a conservative angle, eliminating the National Endowment for the Arts entirely (using Wikipedia again) could fund the purchase of around 765,000 air conditioners. Finally, the comparison of heat waves with terrorism was simply because people have been wound up about terrorism - foreign terrorism, especially, but you have to argue with some mofos that a White supremacist shooting up a church full of Black people is terrorism - for almost 2 decades now, while more serious threats go largely ignored. (Back to the DoD, iirc, they're one of the few agencies to rate climate change as a bigger threat than international terrorism, although heat waves would only be a small part of that bigger picture, from their perspective.) I could just as easily have said that the NSA should buy everybody an air conditioner, but my hunch is that the Pentagon's budget is bigger.