TIL: Today I Learned

Status
Not open for further replies.
TIL: Interpol ranks art crime as the 4th highest-grossing criminal trade.
That's only because Boy with Apple is grossly overpriced
 
Lecture topic: Sherlock Holmes Investigates Atlantis: Did Plato base his story on real events?
My summary of the two hour talk:

Greek history time line:
Cycladic culture: 3200-1900 BCE
Minoan Culture: 1800-14000
Mycenaean Culture; 1600-1100
Dark Age: 1100-800
Archaic Greece: 800-500: Homer's Iliad about 750 and Solon visited Egypt about 600
Classical Greece: 500-338: Plato wrote in 360

Dark Age of Greek history: With the collapse of Mycenaean culture around 1100 BCE Greece entered a period of time in which its past was lost. This “dark” period created a barrier for information passing between what happened prior 1100 and what happened after 800 BCE. Most of the knowledge strands (like use of writing in Linear A) were lost. The strong oral tradition of the Trojan War endured across this barrier and allowed Homer to base his epic poem on actual facts when he wrote the Iliad about 750 BCE even if he didn’t know that the fundamentals of the story were tied to actual events. He made up a grand story rooted in a kernel of truth. Egypt did not endure a dark age period at this time. Its records of the past were intact.

Plato's Story: He wrote about Atlantis in two dialogues: Critias and Timeus. Critias detailed lots and lots of data about Atlantis such as population, army, society, kings, agriculture etc. Timeus talks about the story and what happened. The Critias data is internally consistent and self referential. It does not match any known external data. A single source for such a mountain of data is unlikely and it is similar to the kind made up information that Frank Baum compiled for OZ, GRRM for Westros, JRRT for Middle Earth etc. Cherry picking specific data from it only leads people astray, because when you find a place that matches some data points, it will fail in others. (Eye of Africa?). So all of that data was set aside.

Timeus tells a story about two civilizations at war. One was Greek and the other was an island civ (Atlantis). The Greeks won the war and then both civs were destroyed. A cataclysm destroyed Atlantis in a day. Both disappeared forever.

Where did Plato get his story? He got it from Solon. Solon was a distant relative who lived around 600 BCE but whose descendants trace a direct line to Plato. The story came from Solon, not the data. Where did Solon get the story? Solon lived in Egypt for ten years. While in Egypt, Solon learned what the Egyptians had recorded about “ancient” Greek history. Solon’s story came from the priests of Sais and was passed down through his family to Plato. This personal connection from Plato back to Solon and back to Egypt lends credence to the story part not being made up by Plato.

When was Atlantis? Solon translated the Egyptian dates and placed Atlantis around 9600 BCE. The actual geologic history of the area makes the 9000 BCE date quite unlikely. Ice sheets covered much of Europe and sea levels were lower such that many of the islands were part of the mainland. But if the Egyptian lunar calendar is used for counting back and not the Greek solar calendar, rather than 9600 BCE we get a more reasonable 1350 BCE or so date.

Where was Atlantis?
Near the Pillars of Heracles? Gibraltar has been called the Pillars of Heracles (PoH) since about 250 BCE. Plato wrote in 360 about events that took place much earlier. In classical Greece the PoH was attached to a dozen different narrows from one end of the Med to the other. Too iffy to be used reliably. What is more important is the actual trading area for ships of the era. Most trading by sea was limited to the eastern Mediterranean where long distances over open water could be avoided. In addition, to fight a war with an island nation, that enemy nation must be within the practicalities of the naval capabilities of the time. That limits Atlantis to the Easter Med.

If the Egyptian stories are true then Atlantis must be an island-based, seafaring nation in the Eastern Mediterranean that was in competition with Greece around 1350 BCE.

For the Greeks, the Mycenaeans fit. For Atlantis, the Therans. The Therans were not the Minoans, but more Cycladic in culture and what they have found on Santorini does not tie them to the Minoans, but rather sets them up as connected, but independent.

So in conclusion: Mycenae fought a naval war with Thera that ended in a cataclysm that destroyed Thera in a day and devastated the Mycenae too and in the end both disappeared. Mycenae did when the Dark age arrived in 1100.

The purpose of Plato's dialogue was to talk philosophy about the perfect city state and corruption. He used a family story passed on from Solon that was rooted in actual events from before the Dark Age and recorded in Egypt to be the narrative theme and then embellished it with his philosophical message. A hint at the very end of the dialogue led the speaker to speculate that all of the mass of information about Atlantis (that was ignored) was the world building Plato did for an epic poem he was going to write but never did.

Whew! I know more, and am quite happy to try and clarify or expand upon this overly brief summation of the talk.
 
Last edited:
When was Atlantis? Solon translated the Egyptian dates and placed Atlantis around 9600 BCE. The actual geologic history of the area makes the 9000 BCE date quite unlikely. Ice sheets covered much of Europe and sea levels were lower such that many of the islands were part of the mainland. But if the Egyptian lunar calendar is used for counting back and not the Greek solar calendar, rather than 9600 BCE we get a more reasonable 1350 BCE or so date.
That is really interesting. I would question this paragraph. I would get from this not "If the Egyptian stories are true then Atlantis must be ... around 1350 BCE" but that the confidence interval for the data of atlantis is from 9600 - 1350 BCE (or perhaps even bigger). Also, I do not see why a lower sea level makes it unlikely. What are currently islands will be part of the mainland, but what are currently undersea mounds would be islands, and they would seem obvious candidates for something that was an island and is now under the sea as Atlantis is supposed to be.
 
My summary of the two hour talk:

Greek history time line:
Cycladic culture: 3200-1900 BCE
Minoan Culture: 1800-14000
Mycenaean Culture; 1600-1100
Dark Age: 1100-800
Archaic Greece: 800-500: Homer's Iliad about 750 and Solon visited Egypt about 600
Classical Greece: 500-338: Plato wrote in 360

Dark Age of Greek history: With the collapse of Mycenaean culture around 1100 BCE Greece entered a period of time in which its past was lost. This “dark” period created a barrier for information passing between what happened prior 1100 and what happened after 800 BCE. Most of the knowledge strands (like use of writing in Linear A) were lost. The strong oral tradition of the Trojan War endured across this barrier and allowed Homer to base his epic poem on actual facts when he wrote the Iliad about 750 BCE even if he didn’t know that the fundamentals of the story were tied to actual events. He made up a grand story rooted in a kernel of truth. Egypt did not endure a dark age period at this time. Its records of the past were intact.

Plato's Story: He wrote about Atlantis in two dialogues: Critias and Timeus. Critias detailed lots and lots of data about Atlantis such as population, army, society, kings, agriculture etc. Timeus talks about the story and what happened. The Critias data is internally consistent and self referential. It does not match any known external data. A single source for such a mountain of data is unlikely and it is similar to the kind made up information that Frank Baum compiled for OZ, GRRM for Westros, JRRT for Middle Earth etc. Cherry picking specific data from it only leads people astray, because when you find a place that matches some data points, it will fail in others. (Eye of Africa?). So all of that data was set aside.

Timeus tells a story about two civilizations at war. One was Greek and the other was an island civ (Atlantis). The Greeks won the war and then both civs were destroyed. A cataclysm destroyed Atlantis in a day. Both disappeared forever.

Where did Plato get his story? He got it from Solon. Solon was a distant relative who lived around 600 BCE but whose descendants trace a direct line to Plato. The story came from Solon, not the data. Where did Solon get the story? Solon lived in Egypt for ten years. While in Egypt, Solon learned what the Egyptians had recorded about “ancient” Greek history. Solon’s story came from the priests of Sais and was passed down through his family to Plato. This personal connection from Plato back to Solon and back to Egypt lends credence to the story part not being made up by Plato.

When was Atlantis? Solon translated the Egyptian dates and placed Atlantis around 9600 BCE. The actual geologic history of the area makes the 9000 BCE date quite unlikely. Ice sheets covered much of Europe and sea levels were lower such that many of the islands were part of the mainland. But if the Egyptian lunar calendar is used for counting back and not the Greek solar calendar, rather than 9600 BCE we get a more reasonable 1350 BCE or so date.

Where was Atlantis?
Near the Pillars of Heracles? Gibraltar has been called the Pillars of Heracles (PoH) since about 250 BCE. Plato wrote in 360 about events that took place much earlier. In classical Greece the PoH was attached to a dozen different narrows from one end of the Med to the other. Too iffy to be used reliably. What is more important is the actual trading area for ships of the era. Most trading by sea was limited to the eastern Mediterranean where long distances over open water could be avoided. In addition, to fight a war with an island nation, that enemy nation must be within the practicalities of the naval capabilities of the time. That limits Atlantis to the Easter Med.

If the Egyptian stories are true then Atlantis must be an island-based, seafaring nation in the Eastern Mediterranean that was in competition with Greece around 1350 BCE.

For the Greeks, the Mycenaeans fit. For Atlantis, the Therans. The Therans were not the Minoans, but more Cycladic in culture and what they have found on Santorini does not tie them to the Minoans, but rather sets them up as connected, but independent.

So in conclusion: Mycenae fought a naval war with Thera that ended in a cataclysm that destroyed Thera in a day and devastated the Mycenae too and in the end both disappeared. Mycenae did when the Dark age arrived in 1100.

The purpose of Plato's dialogue was to talk philosophy about the perfect city state and corruption. He used a family story passed on from Solon that was rooted in actual events from before the Dark Age and recorded in Egypt to be the narrative theme and then embellished it with his philosophical message. A hint at the very end of the dialogue led the speaker to speculate that all of the mass of information about Atlantis (that was ignored) was the world building Plato did for an epic poem he was going to write but never did.

Whew! I know more, and am quite happy to try and clarify or expand upon this overly brief summation of the talk.
Not only was Thera (santorini) destroyed in a day by volcanic erruption, it stands to be obliterated in the future too by the same volcano which is still active.
That said, afaik thera was never the center of the cycladic culture. And it always was a small island (not capable of rivaling the mainland).
 
That is really interesting. I would question this paragraph. I would get from this not "If the Egyptian stories are true then Atlantis must be ... around 1350 BCE" but that the confidence interval for the data of atlantis is from 9600 - 1350 BCE (or perhaps even bigger). Also, I do not see why a lower sea level makes it unlikely. What are currently islands will be part of the mainland, but what are currently undersea mounds would be islands, and they would seem obvious candidates for something that was an island and is now under the sea as Atlantis is supposed to be.
Here is a map similar to the one presented last night showing the lower sea levels. Most of the islands just disappear. The speaker usedthe what he saw as a translation error of the dates (from Egyptian calendar to the Greek one) and the lower sea levels from 9000 BCE to rule out the earlier time frame. The acceptance f using the Egyptian Lunar calendar to date the story moves everything forward to the second millennium BCE.

upload_2019-3-14_11-5-2.png
 
Not only was Thera (santorini) destroyed in a day by volcanic erruption, it stands to be obliterated in the future too by the same volcano which is still active.
That said, afaik Thera was never the center of the cycladic culture. And it always was a small island (not capable of rivaling the mainland).
His case about Thera was that it was an economically dominant power in the region not a military one and that created friction with mainland Greeks. He also differentiated between Cycladic culture, Minoan Culture and Thera being an independent hybrid. By the time Thera erupted the Cyclades as a culture were mostly gone. they were mentioned because in the broader time frame they were a Greek culture. Their demise about 1900 put them out of contention for either the Greek protagonist or the Atlantean.
 
No, it means cavemen who preferred salt and vinegar versus cavemen who preferred cheese and onion.
 
But if the Egyptian lunar calendar is used for counting back and not the Greek solar calendar, rather than 9600 BCE we get a more reasonable 1350 BCE or so date.
this discrepancy seems way too large

the muslim lunar calendar is off I think 11 days per year from the gregorian, and I would assume that sort of discrepancy, but like how does (very roughly) 1000 years turn into 9000 years?
 
this discrepancy seems way too large

the muslim lunar calendar is off I think 11 days per year from the gregorian, and I would assume that sort of discrepancy, but like how does (very roughly) 1000 years turn into 9000 years?
From what I heard last night the difference is not like going from Julian to Gregorian etc. but rather that the calendar was in months and that Solon translated those as years. When you count back what Solon noted as years as months the time of the events moves into closer proximity to the historical possibilities. This is an important part of the argument. A bit of time was spent on it, but I did not take notes on that. From a making sense of things position, it seems more likely that the Egyptian records were 1000 years old (within Egyptian known history) and not 9000 years old.
 
Are there any recordings of the conference/lecture?
 
Last edited:
An opinion that Atlantis is in Mauritania
Yeah, what this person has done, like many others, is to select specific items from Critas, the circular structure of Atlantis (and ignoring others) and searched for those around the world. He found the eye of Africa! He uses salt water wells as evidence of the Eye's once proximity to the ocean and that geologic uplift has raised the land to its current 1300 foot elevation. He also imagines all kinds of natural disasters to account for its disappearance.

Now if you go back to the story that Atlantis, an island nation, fought a war with a Greek state, how could such a war be fought? Even in Mycenaean times Greek ships would struggle to carry out an attack against an enemy so far away. Most folks spend their time looking for place but not considering the actual story being told.
 
this discrepancy seems way too large

the muslim lunar calendar is off I think 11 days per year from the gregorian, and I would assume that sort of discrepancy, but like how does (very roughly) 1000 years turn into 9000 years?

Solon lived 600 BC
to 9600 BC that would be 9,000 years... or 9,000 months if you use lunar calendar. you need approx 12,35 lunar months per year. 9,000 divided by 12,35 is 729 year.
From Solon of 600 BC back 729 year in time gives 1329 BC
 
This ignores of course the idea that perhaps Platon fabricated the whole thing (or appropriated it from older stories) as part of his morality tales.
 
This ignores of course the idea that perhaps Platon fabricated the whole thing (or appropriated it from older stories) as part of his morality tales.
Plato was creating a philosophical morality tale about an ideal state and used a story to do so. Much of the detailed data about Atlantean culture and civ is clearly fabricated. The point of the lecture was to establish that, irrespective of the fake data, Plato's story of two civ at war and their destruction was rooted in distant truth.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom