Tip the pizza delivery driver!

If that were true, there would not be a million Speed Limit signs or Curb Your Dog, Fine = $100 signs or Left Lane MUST Turn Left signs floating around here.

That would be an argument for having a suggested tip line on a menu, and maybe it should be so. Not having a giant sign outside the store "In New York City, the sales tax is 8.625%" or posting the totals of each item with tax included seems to fail the "law is to be known by all people" thing. You'll either know that it'll be imposed going in, like one knows that you tip the waiter going in, or you'll be hit with it at the register or with the blank stare on a waiter's face when you tip him only a smile.

Not really, yankee; The reason for these signs is that these administrative orders (speeding, not curbing your dog) are commonly disobeyed, and the means to oversee them are poor, depending on a guard conveniently being there at the moment to see the violation. The signs serves as reminders of places where obedience is critical, but these aren't what exerts the order. Law is. In fact, you have to obey speed limit and curb your dog even where there aren't such signs.

As for taxes, the means for auditory are strong; you have a duty to inform what is owed, and the IRS authority has access to all your related papers should any doubt arises as to the correct amount.Nevertheless, nothing forbids a big sign informing of taxes, and that perhaps would be very informative specially to foreigners, but all obligations which are imposed by law does not necessitate a specific notification, as it is a duty of every person to know all law that is applicable in his area (nobody can pledge not knowing of a legal obligation, however obscure).

Obligations not imposed by law, even if "socially expected", do not share this same status, and ought to be made unquestionably known before you even begin to consider them binding.

Regards :).
 
I'll ask you straight: Does it strike you as dishonest for a pizza delivery company to advertise delivery as 'free' when it isn't?

Who advertises their delivery as free and then charges a delivery fee?

Yes I pay him. I pay him whatever it said it had to on the menu, because that is the legal contract I entered into with his business when I ordered.

Come now. :lol: There is no "legal" contract at all when you order pizza. You have absolutely no obligation to pay any amount when it comes to your door.
 
What's your take on sales commissions?

Different story altogether. The commission is mandatory, and it is pre-calculated in the operational costs when building the final price tag. Hence, this mecanism rewards the efficacy of the salesman, but once the salesman has been efficient, his reward is guaranteed.

Isn't this exactly what the "anti-tipping Europeans" (and I, possibly a south-American anti-tipper) have been suggesting; that the pizza man is rewarded by the employee with a fix value or a flat percentage of the product price, this included in the advertised product price?

To illustrate, picture that Car salesman, or real state professionals, got minimum wage, and than depended on a voluntary handout of money from the buyer for their reward. This obviously damaging scenario is actually a illustration of the "tipping culture", unlike the valid system of sales commission.

In short, there is nothing wrong with rewarding an employee with variable amounts of cash depending on how well they perform; However, it is not acceptable that once the performance is finished, and the business closed, than it is still a problem of the employee to calculate the income/cost ration to see if the business was worthwhile. This is wrong exactly because the employee do not have a say in fixing the price or deciding whether the deal would be done or not, hence, can't be burdened by the operational cost of an inconvenient deal.

As he just "follow orders", such cost is a burden of the one who make these decisions, and decide that the business was good enough - A.K.A., the employer.

Quite frankly, this concept's superiority seems rather obvious to me, and apparently, to most european people in the forum. Perhaps the cultural gap between US people and the rest of western world has some areas in which it is larger than expected.

Regards :).
 
Who advertises their delivery as free and then charges a delivery fee?

Come now. :lol: There is no "legal" contract at all when you order pizza. You have absolutely no obligation to pay any amount when it comes to your door.
1) Everyone in the States who advertises 'free delivery' and pays drivers half the minimum wage because they'll get tipped. According to everything i've seen here that's about all of them.

2) It's called a verbal contract. It's legally binding. Over here anyway. It's a legal protection to prevent companies getting stiffed by people changing their minds. Once you tell them to make you a pizza you enter a contractual agreement for which you are obliged to pay just as if you had signed a piece of paper. You guys don't have this sensible measure to protect your businesses?
 
Brennen said:
False Dichotomy. I expect to pay more for better pizzas, but I don't expect to pay more just to get my food delivered in a satisfactory condition, see above regarding basic expectations. In fact the idea that I might get a cold pizza just because someone else has slipped you an extra fiver would mean me taking my money to someplace else where people can fulfil my basic requirements. See above again.

When I delivered pizzas, non-tippers still got 'satisfactory' pizzas unless I messed up by trying to take too many deliveries at once, management screwed up by making me take that many at a time (we were extremely busy/not enough drivers), or I had trouble with the previous stop (customer was passed out drunk). My fault or the business' fault, so I can understand no tip and understand if they choose to go elsewhere.

What usually ended up being the difference between the service of a non-tipper and a tipper was whether or not they got their pizza in 30 minutes or 45 minutes. Either one was 'satisfactory', but one gets his pizza a bit hotter and quicker. Everyone has their own standard for what 'satisfactory' is. Some people have higher expectations of service, and they are willing to pay for it.

The boss can't follow the drivers to see how well they are doing (unless it is really bad that someone phones in a complaint). Tips allow the customer to give input to how he is doing.

Then you are placing a (hidden) premium on service I expect to be standard, and a service advertised as freeto boot. That's both dishonest and poor customer service.

The business isn't making any money from delivering it to you, so from their perspective it is free. The tip is between the customer and the driver, and the customer isn't forced to pay it if they choose not to.

I do realize that if it wasn't for tips then the business would have to pay the driver more (thus increasing the cost of the pizza).

[rant] Maybe this would be a good thing afterall, it would mean that these people who don't have the money for a tip won't be able to order EVERY SINGLE DAY. I would pick up the phone and just hear their voice saying they would like to order a pizza and I would then be able to, without asking them, write down their address, phone number, last name, and that they want a medium pizza with half of it the deluxe with black olives instead of green olives and the other half was sausage, pepporoni and mushroom (Jeezus, that was 9-10 years ago and I still remember everything except his phone #!). It's amazing some of the people who order delivery every day of the week, then wonder why they don't have rent money. [/rant]

Masquerouge said:
You're totally right. Do drivers share tips with the rest of the chain? I know they do that in some restaurants, all tips are pooled then split... Dunno if it includes the cooks.

In most places the cooks are paid far more than the drivers or servers (before tips are added). Cooks don't have to deal with customers as much (if at all), so their attitude doesn't usually matter as they don't have to try and keep a happy face even when dealing with jerk customers. If they are a bad cook, management will certainly be hearing about it, from the customers and from the servers who are getting bad tips because of the poor food.

When I worked at a small restaurant in a small town we once had a waitress that was so bad, we had a customer who opened the kitchen door and gave the cook the entire tip because the food was great, but the service was poor. I imagine that would be difficult to do at larger restaurants or how the building is layed out. Or sometimes they would give me (the cashier) the money and tell me to make sure the cook got it and not the waitress.

There isn't much a cook can do to screw up a pizza except timing it good enough so it's cooked enough without burning it. So I don't see how they could really try to give great service to earn tips. Either the pizza is burnt or it is not. Being more generous with the toppings they could do for a tip, but everyone who isn't getting those extra toppings are absorbing the cost (eventually). So that extra cost should be added to the price of that pizza (so the business gets it to pay for the ingredients) and not given to the cook as a tip.

Because ultimately, if tips are such a great idea, why are they not applied to every kind of service-oriented job? Like cashiers or clerks or...

You are bringing the merchandise to the cashier and carrying it out the door yourself, so no tip. Fast food, no, because all they do is take your order and then give it to you (no return visits to see if you need re-fills, etc.). Taxi driver yes, Bus driver no. Bus driver isn't taking you alone to a specific location, he is just driving the route he would be taking anyways if you were not even there. Tour bus, I don't know, I guess it depends. Only been on one and it was in a van in Austin, TX so it was just my family and another family of 3. He had a sign that said something like tips are appreciated, but not required. He was the owner of the tour bus, IIRC so he makes more than if it was some kid hired to do the tour, so he would be less likely to get tips because most people would feel like he doesn't need the tips as much.

bugfatty300 said:
The delivery charge is $1.50. I get $1 and they get 50 cents (for nothing).

So does the $1 go towards your gas reimbursement, or is this in addition to gas/vehicle cost pay? Either way, I would look at it as even the non-tippers are giving you $1. Some of the far deliveries aren't worth the $1, with what gas prices are at now, but if you have a couple of other stops along the way it is more worth it. I hope you aren't driving around in a newer car or a gas-hog.

Since I always worked at places that didn't have a delivery charge (except for some long distance ones, which I would get to keep the entire delivery charge) I would have thought the delivery charge went to the driver and not tipped as much. Now I'll have to remember to ask how much of it is going to the driver.

The 50 cents isn't for nothing, it is partially to pay for your wage, but I highly doubt it is fully paying your wage unless you are making over a dozen deliveries an hour (I don't think I've ever done that except at bar time if I had a bunch of deliveries to the college campus that we were right next door to, otherwise the stops are just too far away to deliver that many that quickly when you have to make return trips to pick up more orders).

Uh where are you getting your exchange rates on that menu?

In Cardiff, Wales
Large Pepperoni Plus = $21.30 USD (10.50 GBP)

In Wilkesboro, NC:
Large Pepperoni Lovers = $12.90 USD

Free delivery huh?

warpus said:
Most places here already have a 'delivery charge', so I would not expect the price of a pizza to go up by much.

I think comparing prices is a little pointless. Domino's has the cheapest prices, but they don't put crap for toppings on their pizza. I once ordered a pizza with green peppers on it and only had three little strips of green pepper on the whole pizza! I've had $20 pizzas before from a small pizza place, but they put at least 10-20X the amount of toppings on it than Domino's does. How far is the average delivery distance in other countries compared to the U.S.?
 
1) Everyone in the States who advertises 'free delivery' and pays drivers half the minimum wage because they'll get tipped. According to everything i've seen here that's about all of them.
Who would that be? I've kept up with this thread and never seen one referenced anywhere. Maybe I missed it?
It's called a verbal contract. It's legally binding. Over here anyway. It's a legal protection to prevent companies getting stiffed by people changing their minds. Once you tell them to make you a pizza you enter a contractual agreement for which you are obliged to pay just as if you had signed a piece of paper. You guys don't have this sensible measure to protect your businesses?
:lol: Nope. If someone doesn't want the pizza then they don't have to pay for it. Even if they ordered it.

Don't you think its dishonest to put people into "hidden" legally binding contracts?

By the way, how the heck do they prove verbal contract in a court? I mean do Pizza places record all the phone orders or something?
 
1) Everyone in the States who advertises 'free delivery' and pays drivers half the minimum wage because they'll get tipped. According to everything i've seen here that's about all of them.

AFIK, all drivers get at least minimum. They would have a hard time finding people willing to use their own vehicle and only get half the minimum. The $2 is what many waiters/waitresses are paid.

2) It's called a verbal contract. It's legally binding. Over here anyway. It's a legal protection to prevent companies getting stiffed by people changing their minds. Once you tell them to make you a pizza you enter a contractual agreement for which you are obliged to pay just as if you had signed a piece of paper. You guys don't have this sensible measure to protect your businesses?

If it doesn't arrive until over an hour later, you are not required to buy it (even if they didn't give you an estimated time). You had the intention of buying it, but were not satisfied with the service so you cancelled before the goods and money exchanged hands.

If it gets there in 30 minutes and you suddenly say you don't want it, then it would seem that you never had the intention to buy it, so this would look more like fraud (whether the company actually pursues legal action is doubtful except for extreme cases).
 
If it gets there in 30 minutes and you suddenly say you don't want it, then it would seem that you never had the intention to buy it, so this would look more like fraud.

How could it look like fraud? What exactly would you obtain by ordering a pizza and then not paying for it? Fraud is obtaining money or goods through false pretenses. Obviously if you don't hand over money you won't get the food. Of course doing that would make you a jackass thats wasted the driver's and store's time but a criminal?

If they ordered a pizza and then tried to goad the store into giving it to them for free then that can be pretty sketchy. But simply choosing to cancel the order?
 
How could look like fraud? What exactly would you obtain by ordering a pizza and then not paying for it?

If they ordered a pizza and then tried to goad the store into giving it to them for free then that can be pretty sketchy. But simply choosing to cancel the order?

Fraud was perhaps the wrong term. I meant prank, and people could* be ticketed by the police for calling in prank orders and sued for the loss the business took in preparing the food and sending the driver out to 'deliver' it.

*Not likely, unless they are doing it multiple times.
 
When I delivered pizzas, non-tippers still got 'satisfactory' pizzas
So then what am I tipping for?
What usually ended up being the difference between the service of a non-tipper and a tipper was whether or not they got their pizza in 30 minutes or 45 minutes. Either one was 'satisfactory', but one gets his pizza a bit hotter and quicker. Everyone has their own standard for what 'satisfactory' is. Some people have higher expectations of service, and they are willing to pay for it.
Are they? I mean, everyone tips right? Either that or they appear to be under the impression they're gonna get cold pizzas covered in spittle. People appear to me to be tipping because they feel obliged to do so to get satisfactory service, not out of a desire to receive their pizza in ten seconds flat.
The boss can't follow the drivers to see how well they are doing (unless it is really bad that someone phones in a complaint). Tips allow the customer to give input to how he is doing.
So does having a competitor up the road. Tips also allow the caterer to pass on the risk to their staff, pay them a sub-standard wage and falsely advertise their service as free. IMO that's distinctly out of order on three counts. Two of which break the law over here.
The business isn't making any money from delivering it to you, so from their perspective it is free. The tip is between the customer and the driver, and the customer isn't forced to pay it if they choose not to.
That's a naive way of looking at it. It is a service that can be provided to encourage sales, if it increases the likelihood of a sale by more than it costs to provide the service then it makes them money.
I do realize that if it wasn't for tips then the business would have to pay the driver more (thus increasing the cost of the pizza).
Well so what? The pizza obviously costs more than the advertised price already. And i'd be willing to bet that a lot of people currently tip a lot more than is necessary, getting rid of the tipping culture would probably make pizzas cheaper for most of you.
 
Fraud was perhaps the wrong term. I meant prank, and people could* be ticketed by the police for calling in prank orders and sued for the loss the business took in preparing the food and sending the driver out to 'deliver' it.

They'd have to be some classy folks to prank call pizzas to their own address.:lol:

But yeah, prank calls are rarely prosecuted because its very hard to prove in court.
 
So then what am I tipping for?

Ok, maybe I need to make the difference more pronounced. A non-tipper would get a WARM pizza more often than a tipper. A tipper would get a HOT pizza more often than a non-tipper. As long as it is warm, it is 'satisfactory', at least IMO. Some would say that the pizza just being warm would not be satisfactory. 'Satisfactory' is so arbitrary. What if I think that 45 minutes isn't satisfactory? I become known as a good tipper, so I rarely end up waiting that long, and get the service that I feel is satisfactory.

Are they? I mean, everyone tips right? Either that or they appear to be under the impression they're gonna get cold pizzas covered in spittle.

Still clinging to that exaggeration, huh?

People appear to me to be tipping because they feel obliged to do so to get satisfactory service, not out of a desire to receive their pizza in ten seconds flat.

It helps ensure I won't be the one stop that nobody wants and saves for their last stop.

And i'd be willing to bet that a lot of people currently tip a lot more than is necessary, getting rid of the tipping culture would probably make pizzas cheaper for most of you.

Cheaper for me, but I will get worse service. I suppose the non-tippers would get better service. It sounds like you would be one of those that would get better service, so I see why you would want us to change the system.....
 
Well, if the average tip allready is inluded in the price, the customers who rarely tip will pay a bit more, those who often tip will pay a bit less.

So, the right persons get awarded/penalised :)

And in places where I don't tip, I don't have sloppy service, so asuming the service goes down is a bit presumptious I'd think. And the tip-concept assumes that you are well know in the place where you order.
 
I become known as a good tipper, so I rarely end up waiting that long, and get the service that I feel is satisfactory.
How do you know this is because you tip? And why should you not just expect the best service - see my last point below. If you are assuming that unless you pay more than the advertised price service will be below par then you as the customer need to up your expectations. this is free-market stuff here, you should be agreeing with me!
Still clinging to that exaggeration, huh?
Why else does everyone tip?
It helps ensure I won't be the one stop that nobody wants and saves for their last stop.
Having to pay extra to avoid substandard service indicates that there is a problem.
Cheaper for me, but I will get worse service. I suppose the non-tippers would get better service. It sounds like you would be one of those that would get better service, so I see why you would want us to change the system.
Hey I work in a 'customer service' environment. From where i'm sitting you provide the best service you can or you're not doing your job. Our clients were plying me with chocolate biscuits yesterday so i'm fairly sure I do a good job in that respect. And I don't reserve the right to treat clients poorly if they don't give me a backhander because that would mean I was doing my job badly.

In certain other industries backhanders are regarded as bribes no?
 
How do you know this is because you tip?

How does Ziggy know that the service he gets at the places he doesn't tip couldn't be better if he did tip. It isn't sloppy, but maybe it could be better. I would suggest he runs an experiment and tips at those places a few times and sees if they are more happy to see him (assuming he gets the same waiter/waitress).

If you are assuming that unless you pay more than the advertised price service will be below par then you as the customer need to up your expectations.

I want above-par service, so I pay for it. The thing about 'average' is there will always be some above it, and some below it. Now, cold pizzas and spit are not even on the scale and nobody deserves that, but the reality is SOMEBODY will have to be the last delivery that the driver makes. There is no way around this with or without a tipping system. Many times the choice is obvious (the farthest stop), while other times it isn't (both stops are about the same distance apart), so the non-tipper will be last.

And I don't reserve the right to treat clients poorly if they don't give me a backhander because that would mean I was doing my job badly.

Non-tippers shouldn't be ignored, treated 'poorly' or given an attitude. But tippers will get a server who is more eager and happy to serve them.

I worked as a cashier and without tips, every customer was an idiot in my mind. Saying "Thank You" after every purchase to these people who I could care less if I saw them was such a drag I sounded like a robot. It didn't matter if I smiled, I would just punch up their price, make their change and say thank you. Such mediocre service because there was no incentive to do anything beyond that.
 
How does Ziggy know that the service he gets at the places he doesn't tip couldn't be better if he did tip. It isn't sloppy, but maybe it could be better. I would suggest he runs an experiment and tips at those places a few times and sees if they are more happy to see him (assuming he gets the same waiter/waitress).
I'm a very nice guy, so this experiment wouldn't be scientific. They're always happy to see me :D

We often get a bottle of greek wine (Maphrodaphne) because we visit often. Allthough, I do tip there, it's not much, but they don't really expect to be tipped. Rounding the bill upto the nearest round figure usually. As a result, we get the wine. So, I don't consider it tipping. Heck, they're just nice people as well :)

I wouldn't know in what way service could be better. I don't want them groveling, they check up on us regularly, tipping isn't an issue since it's not in our culture. It's not really fair to compare these situations. :)
 
I worked as a cashier and without tips, every customer was an idiot in my mind. Saying "Thank You" after every purchase to these people who I could care less if I saw them was such a drag I sounded like a robot. It didn't matter if I smiled, I would just punch up their price, make their change and say thank you. Such mediocre service because there was no incentive to do anything beyond that.

Well when I worked in a big supermarket I just got on with it... I can't see there was much more for me to do other than that.
But when I worked in a smaller clothes store down the high street I got to persuade the customers to buy more and generally just give a good service. I might not have been tipped, but I sure was noticed by my boss and given bonuses and "awards" every quarter.
 
In a free market economy i take my custom somewhere that gives me the service I expect; and i'm not seeing it on this thread.
The service you "expect?" You're still wrong. You get the service you pay for, not the service you "expect." The customer does not arbitrarily dictate the price of services sans artifical controls. Paying for a service is essentially the same as paying for manufactured goods. Your insistance here is no less riciculous than demanding a much higher quality bike at the same price as a Was-Mart throw-away. It just makes no sense. :crazyeye: :confused:
 
I worked as a cashier and without tips, every customer was an idiot in my mind. Saying "Thank You" after every purchase to these people who I could care less if I saw them was such a drag I sounded like a robot. It didn't matter if I smiled, I would just punch up their price, make their change and say thank you. Such mediocre service because there was no incentive to do anything beyond that.
Incentive?

YOU'RE FIRED.

Have a nice day. :)
 
You learn how tipping works by eating out.. You'll get ridiculed by your friends if you tip too low, or don't tip.. so you learn.
Most do. Others throw tantrums because they don't believe it's fair to pay for services. :confused:
 
Back
Top Bottom