I'd like a 1700 start with Duchy of Savoy in Turin spot, with an indipendent Cagliari that flips to get Kingdom of Sardinia.
A couple of transport, and a Great General (Giuseppe Garibaldi).
Venice will flip too.
1 UHV is Build Palace in Rome by 1860
2 UHV, 65% of Mediterranean Sea is too much. Italy never got such expansion, more correct is to control Libia in 1912 and Italian eastern Africa (ethiopia and somalia) in 1940
Mongol respawn- many of the 8 banners were ethnic mongols. I don't think the Manchu could have consolidated without a fractured Mongolia. I don't think Manchu should spawn if the Mongols still exist.
UHV2
by the 1850s China was already losing its edge. The U.K. + India had a larger GDP in PPP terms (I'm using the Maddison GDP set), and China certainly wasn't the industrial powerhouse that Britain was. Would you rather that we pushed this date further back into the 18th century or kept the UHV as is?
UHV3 My goal here is to keep all UHV goals to the mid-19th century or earlier. I want these not to make the Qing be anti-European. That way it's not more difficult to simulate European imperialism. I also don't want any tech UHVs bc by the 19th century I expect Qing to be very backward. My understanding was that the 18th century Qing was a literary golden age? Do you have any alternative UHV suggestions that would be pre-1842?
Piaohao - they had nothing to do with food production in real life. I don't think we should stretch buildings historical usefulness so far. However, I would like to have it help w population growth. Do you have any ideas on this? I'm open to any and all suggestions here. Was there a uniquely Manchu building that we could use instead?
In general what I'm going for here is to have the Manchu be quite primative and crush the advanced Ming. That will simulate the technological backwardness of China under the Qing which emerged in the 17th century, got worse in the 18th, and was a glaring tech gap by the 19th. Then after they collapse in the late 19th or early 20th century modern China can come back under Mao as an up-to-date modern state.
The current Italian territorial goal reflects the desired control of the Mediterranean under the fascists. Germany never controlled Russia or England either.
Ok, since I think it'll be impossible for the Qing to be more advanced than the European just bc how stacked the deck will be against them on the tech front. Would the UHV have the highest score in the world in 1900 be a good substitute? If not, what alternatives could we use that don't involve technology?What Leo said is just I want to express. Both in DoC and Vanilla RFC, we have many UHVs that the civ never get in history, such as Germany control Russia and England, Russia be the 1st to complete Apollo and Manhattan, and Inca survive at 1700ad, etc. In my imagine, the UHV3 of Qing is to simulate how things will be if the westernization movement succeed in late 19th century, Also Qing Empire indeed had a strong navy in 1890s. As for UHV2, I agree your opinion. As for UB, In 1.13 we make Mancheng(A district for Manchu in Chinese cities in Qing Dynasty) as UB, replace granary(but I prefer to replace market), stores 15% of food after growth. Just for reference.
In fact, when you control China+Xinjiang+Mongolia+Manchuria+Tibet+Vietnam+Korea, you can hardly not be the 1st on score board.. Never lose a city by XX year is too boring. So just now I don't have any good idea about UHV3.Ok, since I think it'll be impossible for the Qing to be more advanced than the European just bc how stacked the deck will be against them on the tech front. Would the UHV have the highest score in the world in 1900 be a good substitute? If not, what alternatives could we use that don't involve technology?
Mancheng is good. As long as it works.
What about win wars against 8 different European powers by 1900, lose no cities, and have the highest score in the world? Can that be done? I'm not an expert on actually creating UHVs although I want to learn.In fact, when you control China+Xinjiang+Mongolia+Manchuria+Tibet+Vietnam+Korea, you can hardly not be the 1st on score board.. Never lose a city by XX year is too boring. So just now I don't have any good idea about UHV3.
How about a Manchu civ that dates back further to the Jin dynasty?
I think it would be more interesting, giving them a high chance of respawn from 17th century.Yeah, I meant the Jurchen Jin dynasty from the 12th century.
It's a bad idea. The Jurchens didn't begin to become agricultural and live in cities until the 16th century. They didnt have an alphabet until Nurhaci. If you were to do this then they'd need 2 sets of UHVs bc the Manchus were so different from the Jin dynasty Jurchens. I don't think a civ should spawn until they have settled cities. Hence why the Mongols are the first hordelands civ -- bc they built cities. It's the same reason why we dont include the Gokturks.Or even a UHV that expects their survival against the Mongols. I don't know if it is more interesting to take over all of China from that position or a later Nurhaci era start.
Hard to say. I think they should spawn in 257BC. If they get conquered by the Chinese and have to respawn then they get conquered by the Chinese. It's historical. Plus, they'll respawn for sure when the Mongols go all banzai on the Chinese.What would a Vietnamese civ look like? When would they even spawn? The first state in the area dates from 257BC, sustained independence from 938AD, but lots of short periods of independence between those two dates. Gameplay-wise a later date is probably best, with Hanoi either being an indie city or founded by China. UHV is harder, though. Everything I can think of is either excessively passive or already used for Korea or Thailand
So I've found 2 major achievements from the High Qing:In fact, when you control China+Xinjiang+Mongolia+Manchuria+Tibet+Vietnam+Korea, you can hardly not be the 1st on score board.. Never lose a city by XX year is too boring. So just now I don't have any good idea about UHV3.
Qing is better known for expansion of territory in China. In Qing Dynasty, China totally controlled Mongolia, Tibet, Xinjiang, Manchuria(include some part of Russian Far East now) and some part of Burma. The territory of modern China is based on Qing's territory. In fact, in Qing Dynasty China totally controlled Tibet and Taiwan for the first time in the whole history.So I've found 2 major achievements from the High Qing:
1. 4% annual increase in international trade with a massive positive balance of payments.
2. Cultural explosion: Kangxi Dictionary, Imperial Encyclopedia, Literature (Opera, Dramas, Anthologies, More female and vernacular poetry), Novels (Dream of the Red Chamber and -- less important -- The Scholars and Flowers in the Mirror), the Individualist movement in Chinese painting, Peking Opera.
So I was wondering, in China, which of these is the Qing better known for? We can do a third UHV centered around resource exports or one around culture. Which sounds better to you?