That's just some crazy logic. So Western Ukraine was under "Polish military occupation" but Eastern Ukraine was a integral part of the USSR and both were liberated following WW2. I guess I just can't argue with suck bizarre double standards.
I'm just re-checked, and conversation between Domen and me about that stuff is still up. How come you're came with same question again, where you got the idea about "was under "Polish military occupation"" from the start, can i ask?
Holodomor question was discussed many times here. There are not a single evidence that mass starvation was intended result of policies, rather than result of mismanagement. Ukrainians in USSR were treated the same as Russians.
Tens of millions of people die between 1914-1939, even before WW2 started. Ukrainians as a national group weren't discriminated in USSR, in fact number of Russians who suffered and died from hunger in 1932-1933 was even higher. Comparing it to Nazi policies of purposeful extermination of Slavs and other groups is totally wrong.
If national-wide hunger is the same for you as the planned policy of extermination, I give up.
Actually the 2 events are somewhat close, and worth comparing. As the Nazis didnt performed the aforementioned planned purposeful extermination (and now we even wouldnt be able to check if they would'd do it or not (what is very good on its own, as we could expect bad outcome)), the named mismanagement did resulted in a huge casualties. You can compare them to a some huge technogenic or transport catastrophe, what came not out of sudden, but has been preceded with warning calls on various levels about the obvious incompetence of the management running the objects in charge, while the management claimed what absolutely no problems claimed are exist; and to a death treat issue. Both are pretty severe crimes, and actually there is a quite good chance, what the named management, the action(s) of what is resulted in large number of deaths due to incompetence (even without evidence about direct malicious intent for those deaths) would get a more harsh justice from some court in charge than some guys who's sended a death treats on a radio about "we will kill you all", while not performed the planned action. Also the timescale posted is making the idea about "moving away" from good-hearted, but blatantly incompetent management, what is also clearly showed the intent of not accepting any criticism, so unlikely to become any more competent in foreseeable future quite valid. Those people quite likely was not so deeply aware about stuff going on under Nazi regime (mainly due to mass communications being in early stage those time), but was pretty aware about stuff whats going on right where they are. Somewhat similar to a people, who's jump off windows during the fire raging in a building they are in.
You have a thing in common with Terxpahseyton. To skip a word "some" in your sentences and trying to speak for all Ukrainians.
Looks like they are just trying to make a conversation more coherent by adapting your (and most other (pro)Russians here) way of doing it. Maybe they just assumed what word "some" is intended by default in a Russian manner of speaking, or so.
Actually i still have some doubts what i really saw it posted from a guy, who is redundantly speaking for all Russians, explaining what they are doing, and why they are doing (essentially skipping that boring "some" in a process). And actually skipping the word "some" in a sentences is lesser damage than skipping the pivotal parts of a statement one is supposedly replying to, and replying to something completely different in result, as it lead either to direct ceasing of communication, or long and boring process of fixing stuff, what was so easy not to break from the start.