I don't like it, but it is an improvement from the Bush administration. You won't get much support from a lot of conservatives that have been around here for a while because they thought bypassing FISA courts was a-ok.Based on the posting thus far, it seems the WH is right. It seems people will totally trust them to only do nice things with this power and not be evil and underhanded like the previous admin was when they did the same things the current admin was once critical of. All this in spite of the fact the law this order was based on a) doesn't allow for a broad based dragnet and b) requires a slightly better reason why the government should get the records than #### you that's why.
Just look at the politicians:
http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/ticket/lindsey-graham-m-glad-nsa-collecting-phone-records-151211411.htmlSen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., said on Thursday morning he's "glad" the National Security Agency is secretly collecting millions of telephone records from Americans in an effort to track down terrorism suspects.
“We are very much under threat," Graham said on "Fox & Friends," adding that he is a customer of Verizon, the communications company ordered to turn over the records to the government. "Radical Islam is on the rise throughout the region. Homegrown terrorism is one of my biggest concerns. It is happening in our own backyard, and I am glad that NSA is trying to find out what terrorists are up to overseas and inside the country."
Graham isn't the only Republican defending the Obama administration's broad surveillance program, which the Guardian newspaper exposed on Wednesday.
Ari Fleischer, President's George W. Bush's former press secretary, wrote on Twitter that Obama "is carrying out Bush's fourth term" with drone strikes, phone surveillance and Guantanamo Bay. "Just to be clear & so silent liberals understand, I support President O's anti-terror actions. They're bi-partisan now," he wrote.
Sen. Saxby Chambliss of Georgia told reporters the program is long-standing and legal.