OMG, that's the understatement of the century (which is admittedly still a bit young I guess). So anyway, I read "The Lottery in Babylon" and that was excellent. Gotta read it many more times I feel, simply because there are so many levels to view it from. But I also read "Pierre Menard, Author of The Quixote" and took much more away from that one. Wiki has enough in the way of notes to highlight some of its issues, but I thought that his comment on the social, temporal and intellectual context of a piece defining its meaning was the most valuable point.C~G said:Borges.
chrisrossi said:I don't understand. Isn't the post limit for each thread 1000?
Like that book I posted about earlier suggested, even those are stories and even those carry ideologies with them that in turn bring various social and cultural assumptions.CartesianFart said:I just read some contents on the back of my shampoo and shaving cream.Yesterday i've read the instruction manual of my DVD player.Good read,if you ask me.
I read the beginning of that book when I was younger, I don't know why I stopped.Kan' Sharuminar said:Just finished Rubicon, by Tom Holland. A fine introduction to ancient Rome for me, have been wanting such a history book for a while.
Now I'm on The Fabric of the Cosmos by Brian Greene. Something to do with space and time and all that lark. I may be some time
LLXerxes said:As for I, I'm reading Mutiny on the Bounty, by Charles Nordhoff
No doubt about that.Rambuchan said:So, that first one explains a few things, does it?
Thanks. Perhaps I will offer my thoughts on it when I have digested it, it is pretty interesting and controversial stuff.Rambuchan said:Oh, I bet you're delighted with that find! Congrats!
Yes indeed. But what i remember best is anyway Eco's answer when somebody asked him why he wrote "The Name of the Rose". "I wanted to kill some monks!"I never mentioned that I read "The Key to the Name of the Rose" a while back. That was another fine accompaniment to a great, great work of literature.