Threatened with bankruptcy on the first day? Clearly, your predecessor had not been running the place well! No wonder they elected you as the next mayor!
But yeah, I saw that they eventually fixed several of the complaints about Sim City 5, notably that it runs offline now, although not the city sizes being small. I'll be curious to hear whether it eventually draws you in or not.
I've started a single-player campaign of
Macedon II: Total War, also known as playing Macedon in Rome II. I'd always played Rome, who would have guessed based on my avatar? But I had tried
Rome Total War: Alexander, the expansion to the first game, and have been on a Philip II/Alexander III of Macedon historical kick recently. RTW:Alexander is not the most stable, and Alexander must survive, despite being no more durable than any other general, which means he usually dies about the second time his unit is used in battle. You'd think he'd have commissioned a better suit of armor, being so powerful. At any rate,
Macedon II has an interesting setup, Macedon is of course not the well-oil war machine that Philip II historically left his son, dominant in southeastern Europe and poised to spring into Asia Minor. Instead, it's 272 BC, and Antigonas II Gonatus has recently reclaimed his lands from Pyrrhus of Epirus. Yes, that Pyrrhus of Epirus, who had recently returned home from Italy with large debts and a sizeable army. How best to pay off his debts? Why, by conquering Macedon. Which he largely did, leaving Antigonas in charge of only the more provincial areas. Then, Pyrrhus declared war on Sparta, at the invitation of the pretender Cleonymus.
Antigonas, with a weakened army, hastened to Sparta, where his troops helped the local garrison hold out until the main Spartan army returned from Crete. Pyrrhus eventually retreated and pillaged the countryside, before both he and Antigonas took up positions by the second-most-powerful town in the Pelopponese, Argos. The Argives sought to remain neutral; Antigonas agreed and guaranteed his neutrality by placing his son as a hostage. Pyrrhus verbally agreed, but betrayed his word, invading the city in the middle of the night. The Argives urged Antigonas to help them, which he did, and Pyrrhus's army was delayed by their elephants getting stuck in the town gates (large elephants, small gates. An advantage of the more traditional horses). In the melee, Pyrrhus was killed by an old woman, who threw a ceramic tile at him from a rooftop, knocking him from his horse and paralyzing him. This would enable Antigonas to reclaim Macedon, but not end the conflicts with Epirus, as Pyrrhus's successor, Alexander II, would renew his father's external struggles.
----
And that's just the historical setup. Oh yeah, and Macedon also starts off at war with
Tylis, the Gaullic tribe that lives in southeastern Thrace, including the area nearest the Bosporus.
So, I take over, and at the time, Sparta is a defensive ally, with Athens being a client state. I go about fighting Tylis, whom Antigonas had already defeated once, prior to the game's start, but only to the degree of preventing Macedon from falling to them. They prove to be a worthy foe; I conquer their capital, but their remaining army conquers northern Macedon (modern Plovdic, Bulgaria), so I have to go back and retake Pulpadeva, which also had rebel problems. This takes us to about 259 BC, thirteen years into the game.
Meanwhile, Sparta has called me to arms against Epirus. I decide to be honourable and answer the call, and while my armies are still in the tussle with Tylis, Epirus briefly besieges our capital of Pella, although they soon retreat. Why? Because Sparta is on a rampage. Sparta didn't need my help, other than perhaps as a distraction; they conquer all of Epirus, including the lands formerly of
the Ardiaei, in southeastern Illyria. To the contrary, Sparta has at some point ended our defensive alliance (I missed the notification), and has decided that it's time to overthrow the Macedonian oppressors once and for all. And they convince Athens to join them as well.
So now it's on, and the year is circa 254 BC.
Antigonas II leads an army south, and takes Larissa, in northern Greece, from Sparta. Sparta marches an army south, and attacks Antigonas in the town - but the larger Spartan army is defeated thanks to the Macedonian sarissa. This emboldens Antigonas, who marches on Sparta itself. The Spartans meet him outside the town, and in a bloody battle, the majority of both sides' armies are felled, including one of the Spartan kings. But while Sparta emerged victorious by a thread, Antigonas II lived to fight another day. He decided to double down on his bet, and recruited mercenaries with which to conquer Sparta once and for all.
This would be a mistake. The other Spartan king was on his way south, but before he arrived, Athens sent their army to Sparta's aid. Faced with overwhelming numbers, Antigonas was forced to retreat, and to retreat farther into the Peloponnese. This gave time for the other Spartan king to arrive, and he was able to defeat Antigonas and his mercenary army. Antigonas met his fate there, in 239 BC.
His son Demetrius, in the meantime, had conquered Eprius and the lands of the Ardiaei from the Spartas. And seeing the fate of his father's army, and the number of Greeks he faced, he sought peace and time to rebuild, which both Athens and Sparta agreed to. This time would be put to good use, both economically, but also militarily, conquering the rest of Thrace from the locals,
the Odrysians. This both secured Macedon's rear flank, and secured the lead deposits at Navissos (modern-day Niš, Serbia) in 222 BC, with the Odrysians defeated again at Pulpudeva (Plovdiv) in 220, after which they agreed to peace. And it was good to have those flanks secured, because during the Odrysian War, Athens and Sparta renewed the hostilities in Greece.
The 220s were best characterized by the Greek proverb, "Summer, harvest, war." Troops and generals on both sides were felled in massive numbers. Demetrius's brother fell to the Odrysians in 226. His other brother fell to the Greeks in 224. His brother-in-law was slewn in 222. His only son was sunk at sea by the Athenians in 221. Meanwhile, the Spartans had conquered Epirus and the important trade city of Apollonia from Macedon, and the Ardaiei had regained their independence thanks to the Odrysians (although Macedonian control of their lands had never been stable, and a peaceful border with them was seen as desirable).
But the loss of his only son had been accompanied by a great defeat of the Athenians, and another Macedonian army, the Thunderbolts of Zeus, conquered Athens in 220. The Thunderbolts continued on by conquering Sparta itself in 219. Not that this meant Sparta was defeated - they still had Epirus, and a large and a medium-sized Spartan army were furiously marching south, intent on making Macedon pay. Demetrius, for his part, fresh from the Odrysian victory, was marching on Epirus, hoping to sandwich the Spartans between his army in the north and the Thunderbolts in the Peloponnese.
And so that is where the game is in 219. It has been a breath of fresh air compared to my Roman games - new geography, and more of a struggle (at Hard/Hard difficulty). And Sparta is almost certain to make me pay, at least partially, meaning that even Greece remains outside of our clean control. Beyond that? Asia Minor seems to hate us, the Ptolemies in Egypt declared war on us for no apparent reason, and our only friends are the Daorsi in central Illyria and this up-and-coming power known as Rome in Italy (although our diplomats warn us of their ruthlessness). My plan, should I not be bested by Sparta, is to head east and try to re-unite the Successor Kingdoms, or
diadochi. Both because it's what any good Macedonian would do, and because it leaves open the possibility of a powerful late-game challenge from Rome, Carthage, or whoever emerges most powerful to my west.