What Video Games Have You Been Playing VII: The Real Ending is Locked Behind a Paywall

Status
Not open for further replies.
After I'd played for a few years, I saw "seal clubbing" as a big problem. It must be really discouraging for new people to get strangled by veteran players without comment or instruction, and often with a dose of ridicule and insults on top of it. For the conscientious veteran, taking advantage of inexperience and punishing errors without explanation is not fun, yet we're obliged to do it periodically, whenever we start a new family, or 'line', of vehicles. Either we have to spank people in order to move on quickly, or we have to avoid playing the lower-tier vehicles with any intensity.
This is why I can't get into FPS games with a heavy online portion - not that the controls are ever the problem, it's that the skill gulf between me and the average player is enormous. I don't like being killed 5 seconds after spawning, respawning and being killed in 5 seconds over and over.

I started Far Cry Primal over the weekend, since it was on sale, and I'm enjoying it a lot more than I thought I would. The gameplay is Far Cry-standard stuff, but the setting makes it better in a number of ways. The lack of vehicles slows you down, obviously, which improves the exploration aspect of the game and makes it harder to flee predators - I had to jump off a cliff to get away from a mountain lion. Your meta-mission to gather your scattered people and establish a new home gives you a plausible reason to get out there and find trouble (the main character's involvement in the previous games always felt tenuous to me), and seeing the village grow is kind of gratifying (you don't do it all yourself, thank god - with the exception of a handful of special buildings, the people you rescue and/or recruit construct the additions while you're away on your adventures). And there's some novelty in the Stone Age setting, which is important to me. It isn't as creative and interesting as Subnautica, and there is a little bit of 'magic', but at least it's not another [gosh-darned] pseudo-Medieval Europe Tolkien/Howard ripoff.

Initially, I started playing on normal settings, but after 3 or 4 hours I went back and started over on Survival Mode. So far, Survival Mode seems to make many of the game's systems more important, and seems to be where the game is meant to be played. It dramatically cuts the number of weapons you can carry (1 club, 1 spear and 4 arrows initially); makes night darker, longer, and more threatening; and makes more of the Skill Tree useful. Crafting is still much too easy and fast. I'm considering a 'roleplaying' house-rule, where I'll only craft when I'm at the village or in one of the camps.
Good to know it's not a trash game. I may try it if the price is right. I really want Far Cry 5 though.
 
Yeah maybe streamlined was the wrong word. I am talking about the barriers to new players though. They are simply too high for me to want to even attempt to get good at the game and have fun with it. If there are a lot of other people out there that feel the same way, that's going to spell trouble for World of Tanks once the veteran players start moving on. In fact, a quick Google search shows the game is already having a problem with losing players.

Its the rampant cheating and overpowered premium tanks, WOT is reaching its mid to end cycle
Its still ranks up there in the F2P catagory so its making cash, its just getting outdated and tired plus there are plenty of free to play games now competing for gamers time / money
 
Yeah maybe streamlined was the wrong word. I am talking about the barriers to new players though. They are simply too high for me to want to even attempt to get good at the game and have fun with it. If there are a lot of other people out there that feel the same way, that's going to spell trouble for World of Tanks once the veteran players start moving on. In fact, a quick Google search shows the game is already having a problem with losing players.
This is why I can't get into FPS games with a heavy online portion - not that the controls are ever the problem, it's that the skill gulf between me and the average player is enormous. I don't like being killed 5 seconds after spawning, respawning and being killed in 5 seconds over and over.
I enjoyed the overall difficulty level of the game, and I really liked the pace of the battles. Most competitive online games are all about speed. But I didn't like the random mixing of veteran and novice players. Players can "platoon" with each other, which makes an obvious way to mentor a new player, but that only works if you're playing with a friend or just willing to do a stranger a favor. The veteran player gains nothing from the good deed, and suffers in-game consequences for not playing at maximum intensity (so, yes, a veteran player is basically punished for helping a newbie).

Good to know it's not a trash game. I may try it if the price is right. I really want Far Cry 5 though.
Yeah, Primal probably isn't worth full price unless you're a nut for Far Cry (and if you were, I suppose you'd have it already).
 
Can we take a moment to acknowledge how silly it is that Cleo is the leader of Egypt in Civ 6 tho?
 
^Well, ideally, yes they should have used an actual Pharaoh and not a hellenistic ruler, but at least the ptolemaic dynasty was a strong empire with scientific developments (including the first measurement of the circumference of the earth, by Eratosthenes, and of course the Elements by Euclid).

That said, AFAIK Civ6 has an italian princess as ruler of France, and in that case it isn't a ruler most people would have heard of - unlike with Cleopatra.
I think they wanted more female rulers, and didn't want to have Jean (possibly because she wasn't an actual queen).

images
 
^Well, ideally, yes they should have used an actual Pharaoh and not a hellenistic ruler, but at least the ptolemaic dynasty was a strong empire with scientific developments (including the first measurement of the circumference of the earth, by Eratosthenes, and of course the Elements by Euclid).

I know but it's silly, it's like making Khublai Khan the leader of China instead of the Mongols.

I think they wanted more female rulers, and didn't want to have Jean (possibly because she wasn't an actual queen).

FFS, Civ 4 had Hatshepsut, and if it ain't broke, don't fix it. If they really didn't want to reuse her there is a whole list of indigenous female Pharaohs to choose from:
http://www.ancientnile.co.uk/pharaohs-women.php
 
That said, AFAIK Civ6 has an italian princess as ruler of France, and in that case it isn't a ruler most people would have heard of - unlike with Cleopatra.
I think they wanted more female rulers, and didn't want to have Jean (possibly because she wasn't an actual queen).

You think that "people" haven't heard of Catherine de Medici? She's one of history's most famous queen-consorts (somewhat behind Eleanor of Aquitaine, of course).
 
You think that "people" haven't heard of Catherine de Medici? She's one of history's most famous queen-consorts (somewhat behind Eleanor of Aquitaine, of course).
Depending on who the "people" are i doubt even the concession that you made is necessarily correct.
 
It's really weird to me that you couldn't do a black Achilles but Cleopatra played by a woman of Northwest European descent doesn't bother you
We can point out that Cleopatra's ancestors (see above) came to Egypt from Europe, from the North and the West. ;)
 
You think that "people" haven't heard of Catherine de Medici? She's one of history's most famous queen-consorts (somewhat behind Eleanor of Aquitaine, of course).
I had no idea who she was until I played the game and I consider myself versed on history (though no expert or historian proper).
 
I had no idea who she was until I played the game and I consider myself versed on history (though no expert or historian proper).

I hold a vague grasp of the Medici name, but I'm in the same boat as Hobbs. Hadn't heard of Catherine until playing the game.

Although I wouldn't consider myself versed.
 
Last edited:
One of my Sims wants to flirt with a cat he just met. I think I may have corrupted my save.
 
My knowledge also extends to being vaguely familiar with the Medici name, but not anyone specific within that lineage.
 
Sid Meier's Pirates and Mafia 3.
 
Haylcon 6 got it from humble bundle $1 tier
 
On a quest to complete all CK2 achievements.
Still missing ~20 of ~135 or so.
 
My knowledge also extends to being vaguely familiar with the Medici name, but not anyone specific within that lineage.

A) If you've played Assassin's Creed II, Lorenzo "the Magnificent" de' Medici is a significant minor character
B) Given the strict Salic succession in France, Catherine was probably the closest France ever came to a queen-regnant.
C) If you discount Jeanne d'Arc and want a female choice, it's essentially Catherine or Eleanor of Aquitaine only.
 
Last edited:
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom