Which book are you reading now? Volume XI

Status
Not open for further replies.
Took a hiatus from Collapse for a little while. Finished Grant Morrison's Supergods, a history of the superhero and its relation to general western culture, with some surprisingly entertaining autobiographic components as well. Started on All the Pretty Horses, by Cormac McCarthy.

The man can write.
 
Finished Twinkie Deconstructed by Steve Ettlinger. Something sciencey for once. Is it weird I want to buy a Twinkie and poke and prod the crumb and filling while thinking about the properties of the ingredients such as sodium stearoyl lactylate and polysorbate 60?

Next up is Shari'ah Law by Mohammad Hashim Kamali. Never thought I'd be reading a book on Islamic jurisprudence, but here we are.
 
I just ordered William Murray - The Age of Titans: The Rise and Fall of the Great Hellenistic Navies. It's basically about the proliferation of very large ships in the fleets of the great eastern Greek monarchies that were created out of the ashes of Alexander's empire. The building block of fleets used to be the trireme (Greek triereis), a ship that had, for lack of a better description, three banks of rowers. The eastern kings, however, built progressively larger and more impressive ships: the pentereis, or "five" in slang (Roman quinquereme, the basis for one of Carthage/Qarthadast's UUs in Civ 5) was one of the most popular, but eventually they built "eights", "tens", and "fifteens".

The usual story is that the larger ships were basically useless white elephants. This is supposed to fit in with the general narrative of the Successor monarchies as decadent, inefficient, and foolish, wasting their money and men on pomp and circumstance and not using them on the real stuff of warfare, which is why the Romans supposedly beat them. Since other elements of that narrative have been demonstrably collapsed in recent years, I assume that Murray will be exploding at least parts of this myth, too. The book's gotten significant praise from most of the people that I know are better at Hellenistic history than I am, so that's a good sign.

I may produce an in-depth review later.
 
I just ordered William Murray - The Age of Titans: The Rise and Fall of the Great Hellenistic Navies. It's basically about the proliferation of very large ships in the fleets of the great eastern Greek monarchies that were created out of the ashes of Alexander's empire... The book's gotten significant praise from most of the people that I know are better at Hellenistic history than I am, so that's a good sign.

I may produce an in-depth review later.

"In fact..., most Greek authors assert that all ancient warships were invented by their fellow Hellenes...;)" - Richard Miles, Carthage Must Be Destroyed.

I'd be very interested in your review, especially the exegesis of credible sources.
 
The Spirit Catches You and You Fall Down - Exceptionally good, and possibly the only case I've ever come across where someone has managed to explain how to pronounce RPA words easily.
 
I finished The Grapes of Wrath and also The Picture of Dorian Gray. I liked them both.

I also read Pearl Buck's East Wind: West Wind. Like so many of her books, it's about old Chinese having the modern world thrust upon them (in the early 20th century). It's one of her best imo.

Now I have to finish the last half of Huck Finn for school. I'm at a good part, but I really do not care for the book. It's awfully boring imo.

Does anyone have any recommendations for a good book on socialism? I've read on the internet and socialism interests me.
 
I'm starting Erik Falkenstein's new book, The Missing Risk Premium. It's a thorough deconsruction of the Capital Asset Pricing Model and offers an alternative based on relative consumption. If economics were science, this book would radically change how we teach macro and finance courses.
 
I'm starting Erik Falkenstein's new book, The Missing Risk Premium. It's a thorough deconsruction of the Capital Asset Pricing Model and offers an alternative based on relative consumption. If economics were science, this book would radically change how we teach macro and finance courses.

That sounds really good Integral and if I thought I could understand something like that I would totally read it. Instead I've just started Cobra II by Gordon and Trainor. Its the inside story of the invasion and occupation of Iraq. I haven’t gotten to the war yet but so far it’s a very enlightening portrayal of how decisions are made in a complex bureaucracy where so many people have different agendas.
 
I'm about to finish a collection of Seneca's Dialogues and Essays; I have one chapter left, a letter to Nero called "On Mercy". I think Nero may have missed that one. Yesterday I finished The Tell-Tale Brain by V.S. Ramachandran, which explores possible neurological roots of language, art, and introspection. Ramachandran's work on phantom limbs and other disruptions are fascinating as can be...how fickle are our perceptions of reality!

Next up is either Twilight of the Mammoths, which posits that overhunting was the primary source of the many megafauna extinctions in the Americas following the arrival of humans, or Consuming Power, an exploratory history which examines the way energy usage shapes human society.
 
Tried to read Wuthering Heights but it has confusing language so I'm not even going to bother. now I'm rereading David Copperfield, which is much easier to understand.
 
Tried to read Wuthering Heights but it has confusing language so I'm not even going to bother. now I'm rereading David Copperfield, which is much easier to understand.

Lol, really? You find Dickens more readable than Brontë?
 
Lol, really? You find Dickens more readable than Brontë?

Vastly so. To be fair, though, I only read about 15 pages of Brontë. Dickens isn't difficult when you get used to him. I've read three books by him and one by Jane Austen, so I'm used to the language. At first it was difficult, though, reading Dickens.
 
They're both awful and make me want to set something - ideally the book - on fire.
I'd prefer to set Dickens on fire. There's always the danger they might print more books, so it's better to go straight to the source.
 
Vastly so. To be fair, though, I only read about 15 pages of Brontë. Dickens isn't difficult when you get used to him. I've read three books by him and one by Jane Austen, so I'm used to the language. At first it was difficult, though, reading Dickens.

Oh I've read plenty. But jesus.
 
I'd prefer to set Dickens on fire. There's always the danger they might print more books, so it's better to go straight to the source.
Why rob graves when you can fill them? With the employees of publishing companies, natch. :mischief:
 
Real World - Natsuo Kirino
Kokoro - Natsume Soseki
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom