Which book are you reading now? Volume XI

Status
Not open for further replies.
9 things you must do
The secret of self discipline
Panzer Operations The Eastern front meniors of Gen Raus
 
It's in the name, isn't it? :p
Joke all you like, I've finally read each of the six books in the Asian Saga at least once. Now I'm onto Tai-pan…
I read The Order of the Stick. :D
Took me a couple weeks to read it last year. It's still worth the binging, almost as much as Freefall.
 
You are a true Clavellite.
 
Nope, only an Asian Saga fan.
 
Isnt that his most well-known books anyway?
 
Future Crimes, Marc Goodman.
 
Just finished Michio Kaku's The Future of the Mind. Meh

I went through a James Clavell phase back in the 80s. First Shogun, because of the TV miniseries, then Taipan, King Rat, Noble House and Whirlwind. They were all reasonably entertaining.
 
Ain't My America: The Long and Noble History of Antiwar Conservatism and Middle-Class Antimperialism, Bill Kauffman
 
Glassfan, didn't you ever read Gai-jin?
 
Just finished Taxi! A Social History of the New York City Cab Driver. Moving on to The War of the Three Gods: Rome, Persia, and the Rise of Islam.
 
The Story of Modern Skiing by John Fry. Should be self-explanatory, has nice pictures.
 
The Story of Modern Skiing by John Fry. Should be self-explanatory, has nice pictures.
So, it is about deep-sea diving; right?


Still working through Wages of Destruction: The Making and Breaking of the Nazi Economy by Adam Tooze but taking a quick break to re-read Demon by John Varley.
If you like quirky off-the-walls sci-fi I highly recommend it. Although Demon is the third book in the trilogy you can read it without reading the previous ones. The first Titan is pretty forgettable and really not all that important to the plot while the third book Wizard is just an explanation for the shift of Cirocco Jones's character shifts from Titan to Demon.
 
Re-reading I, Partridge. We need to talk about Alan by Alan Partridge (Steve Coogan & Co)
I cannot endorse this book enough.

The critics are mad about it too.

'Very thorough'
-The Norwich enquirer

'Man of the moment'
-TV quick magazine
 
How was it? I'm kind of interested in reading a history book that explores the Roman Persian conflict and its consequences for the success of the Caliphate in conquering the Middle East.
Okay, since old blue eyes hasn't dropped in since...

I did not have a high opinion of it. The fundamental problem with discussing what happened at the beginning of the seventh century is the paucity, unreliability, and lateness of sources. All other issues flow from this difficulty. There are wildly differing narratives of those events that are almost equally plausible, purely because the sources are so difficult.

The book does not really account for this.

Now, in most general-reader historical publications, sources don't really come up. That's apparently what the publishing industry has decided what the average reader can handle, so. Unfortunately, that mission directly clashes with the nature of the book itself. The author claims to be shining light on a period of history that is often underserved, and the early seventh century is undoubtedly underserved both by general history and by academic scholars. But the main reason for this is that the sources suck, so there's only so far you can reasonably go. The author ignores these problems and constructs a narrative anyway. In addition, that publishing imprint tends to turn out works that are relatively short (often less than 200 pages), which is, again, well and good for the average reader and absolutely insufficient for the massive topic chosen (the last Roman-Iranian war and the birth of Islam).

The book makes for a decent story, but I never got the sense that it was history.
 
I read that as ‘The Norway enquirer’, Mr. Snerk.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom