While We Wait: Boredom Strikes Back

Status
Not open for further replies.
You can! I'll accept any valid tender!
 
Thus why #fiftychat is sooo much better. Not all the ego trippin'
 
I wonder what you guys talk about in the chat channel

I agree more or less with EQ, sometimes when I need to private chat with a player in my game I'll get on IRC to do it, but the chat room is dangerous turf and there is no need to hang out there too much.

I also have been known to get on when my ears burn and I suspect it is the source.
 
Gallic settlements and factions. Squares with backslashes are armies. Rome will be a single player (rotating roster? probably not.) and the Ptolemic faction got its toes cut off.
Spoiler :
eitmexample3.png


Now I just need Germanic settlements and factions research/mapped, barbarian armies placed, and British factions mapped.
 
I'm confused about the extent of historicity you're employing here - seems like just enough to make researching a niggling annoyance, but not enough to get any of the people who are attracted to realism.
 
It's a NESlite althistory. Emphasis on lite. It's going to be boardgamey and not exactly realistic. I'm just trying to drum up some interest in maybe playing it.
 
Yeah I'm just saying that you're probably making it too realistic if you're looking up OTL Gallic tribal names for your "cities" there
 
Oh, well "thank you" then, Dachs.
 
If I do recall most of these locations were "settlements" (cities) during the time of the late Roman republic.

Added Damascus, Nineveh, Ecbatana, Susa, and moved Petra. Any other suggestions, tailless?
 
If I do recall most of these locations were "settlements" (cities) during the time of the late Roman republic.
Lotta argument about that, actually, and you're not tracking oppida anyway

plus, this isn't Late Roman Republic, you said so yourself

I'm just trying to make things more fun for you by helping you free yourself from the constraints of petty things like "realism" and "history"
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom