While We Wait: Part 2

Status
Not open for further replies.
You are all cruisin' for closin'. :(
 
So, I was struck by a random thought while reading the S&T thread: given the number of countries in a given popular game like LINESII, NES2 VI / V, or ITNES, it'd be entirely possible to construct Civ3/4 scenarios out of them.
 
It would, I was also thinking of the same for EUIII/MTW2

The map editing process for the later are really hard to get to grips with if your new to it, especially for the scale of what you'd be trying to do. THe former, I'm not so sure about, guessing its similar (graphical program + lots of fiddling about with text files).
 
So, I was struck by a random thought while reading the S&T thread: given the number of countries in a given popular game like LINESII, NES2 VI / V, or ITNES, it\'d be entirely possible to construct Civ3/4 scenarios out of them.
I entirely support this endeavor, as long as I don\'t have to make them. ;)

Seems to me as though certain civs would require getting corrupted to death as representative of their position, i.e. the Ottomans of early NES2 VI (before silver and I destroyed them! :evil: ) or both Qing Chinas.
 
List of Top Ten NESers
As Proposed by Swissempire
1. Swissempire
2. Swissempire
3. Swissempire
4. Swissempire
5. Chip
6. McChipper
7. Symphony D.
8. Das
9. Panda
10. SwissEmpire






99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999. Luckymoose
 
Okay the AIM wars are being carried over into the while we wait thread. Personally, rating NESers is stupid and arguing over it is even worse. We all know what are potential is and the fun part is anticipating the others potential is the fun part.

So lets let this argument die at it gets nowhere and accomplishes nothing. If not do it for your fellow NESers who really do not want see threads filled with this :)
 
List of Top Ten NESers
As Proposed by Swissempire
1. Swissempire
2. Swissempire
3. Swissempire
4. Swissempire
5. Chip
6. McChipper
7. Symphony D.
8. Das
9. Panda
10. SwissEmpire




99999999999999999999999999999999999999999999. Luckymoose

Actually not at all. If you'll notice, I said I wasn't above you, I just said you weren't as good as das and Symphony and Panda. You said you were one of the top 5 NESers. I said that was arrogant. You said I had no idea how great you were. I asked for proof, you got in a humph and posted this.

I have never pretended to be anything above a midlevel NESer.... I don't really know where this came from.....
 
I never said top five. And even listed 6 above me without going into it deeply.

*ahem*

Luckymoose56 (6:55:20 PM): on a scale of 1-10
Luckymoose56 (6:55:23 PM): you are a 5
Luckymoose56 (6:55:26 PM): i am a 8
Luckymoose56 (6:55:30 PM):
Luckymoose56 (6:56:01 PM): das is a 8
Luckymoose56 (6:56:29 PM): nuke kid
Luckymoose56 (6:56:31 PM): is a 0
Luckymoose56 (6:56:39 PM): he doesnt try
SudburyKid05 (6:56:47 PM): -_-
SudburyKid05 (6:56:56 PM): are you serious
SudburyKid05 (6:57:03 PM): :0
Luckymoose56 (6:57:42 PM): panda is a 9
Luckymoose56 (6:57:45 PM): symph is a 9
Luckymoose56 (6:57:47 PM): dis is a 9
SudburyKid05 (6:57:47 PM): and where is Kentharu
Luckymoose56 (6:57:58 PM): 6-7
Luckymoose56 (6:58:17 PM): maybe 8
Luckymoose56 (6:58:22 PM): cuiv is a 9

___________________________________________

So, lets look at this.

1.Dis
1.Symphony D
1.Panda
1.Cuiv
5. You
5. Das
........


That would be top 5. You fixed it after i told other people but :rolleyes:
 
First off, Kentharu is not better than me. Second off, stop or I will report both of your arses.
 
I'mma stop now:goodjob:

My arse needs to feel safe:blush:
 
Cuiv is a 10!
 
As a non arguing point. Saying someone is ranked similar is not saying they are better. The list was not completed so Azale you weren't included yet. As I mentioned before.

@ Cuiv: Yes from seeing your orders in my NES and your play style you are one of the top NESers I have ever seen.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom