Lord_Herobrine
Back in the Saddle
The fact that agriculture was possible here, the air was breathable, and the air pressure and temperature were enough to keep you alive for extended periods of time helped them a little bit.
As Crezth points out, the challenges of martian colonization are daunting. Still, I'm always happy to see some attention being put towards space exploration.
I understand that we will have to figure out how to compensate for the lack of these neccessities if we are to start a colony on mars. You make it sound like we will be waltzing around the outpost in casual clothes; this is not the case. The astronauts being sent there will be equiped with suits like previous astronauts have worn, Life Support Units that:
Spoiler :
This is taken straight from their website:
The Life Support Unit is a Lander rigged with extra technologies which capitalize on the natural resources available on Mars. It uses these resources to create a habitable living environment for the astronauts, as follows:
Electrical energy is generated through the application of thin film solar photovoltaic panels. These are flexible and can be rolled up for compact transportation to Mars.
Potable water will be created through the heating of water ice in the local ground soil. About 60 kilograms of soil is loaded into a container within the Life Support Unit by the Rover and heated to evaporate the water. The water is condensed and the dry soil returned to its origin. A portion of the water is stored while a portion is used to produce oxygen. The Life Support Unit is able to collect 1500 liters water and 120 kilograms oxygen in 500 days time.
Nitrogen and argon gas are extracted from the Mars atmosphere and injected into the habitable space as inert gases. Remember, 80% of what we breathe on Earth is the element nitrogen.
The Life Support Unit is connected to the Living Unit by a tube which feeds the oxygen, nitrogen, and argon to create a habitable atmosphere. Once the astronauts have landed, it will also be in charge of the water purification and removal of waste gas (carbon dioxide) from the Living Unit atmosphere.
The Life Support Unit is a Lander rigged with extra technologies which capitalize on the natural resources available on Mars. It uses these resources to create a habitable living environment for the astronauts, as follows:
Electrical energy is generated through the application of thin film solar photovoltaic panels. These are flexible and can be rolled up for compact transportation to Mars.
Potable water will be created through the heating of water ice in the local ground soil. About 60 kilograms of soil is loaded into a container within the Life Support Unit by the Rover and heated to evaporate the water. The water is condensed and the dry soil returned to its origin. A portion of the water is stored while a portion is used to produce oxygen. The Life Support Unit is able to collect 1500 liters water and 120 kilograms oxygen in 500 days time.
Nitrogen and argon gas are extracted from the Mars atmosphere and injected into the habitable space as inert gases. Remember, 80% of what we breathe on Earth is the element nitrogen.
The Life Support Unit is connected to the Living Unit by a tube which feeds the oxygen, nitrogen, and argon to create a habitable atmosphere. Once the astronauts have landed, it will also be in charge of the water purification and removal of waste gas (carbon dioxide) from the Living Unit atmosphere.
I whole-heartedly agree that the challenges presented are daunting, almost fearful even. But, we already have the technology to produce life-essential materials and resources for a team of four. All the technology that will be used in this trip already exists.
Tripe. Essentially feel-good nonsense. Yes, we've done "great" things before; and yes, it was seemingly on a moment's notice. That has nothing to do with the contours of this particular project nor the challenges it presents.
One of the promises of Mars One is that it is a governmentless endeavor, but you have correctly identified the reality which is that they will rely on NASA, the ESA, etc. And for more than just money, too: they require expertise and seasoned technicians. Of course that's what they're subcontracting out for, and that's what's gonna cost big money. We're talking billions.
Is it technically possible to have that much money? Of course. Is it realistic to expect? Not really.
This is not just "Feel-good nonsense." There are indisputable facts that I believe make this mission a reality. More so comes from the fact that they are using pre-existing technology. No new technology needs to be developed to make this reality, it already exists.
Yes, they do indeed promise that it is a governmentless endeavor. And yes, they will indeed need to rely on other space agencies. One reason is that they are colonizing mars... They clearly stated that they want the entire global community to take part in the mission, not just one nation or space program to achieve this. They will rely on all of those different space agencies to build their corresponding parts that they already promised the organization that they will provide.
I agree that its not just about money. They do/will require expertise and seasoned technicians. But look at the team they have already assembled. Then look at how many advisors they have obtained in the last few months. This is only one the first years of the organization, do you actually think that they will not acquire anymore 'expertise and technicians' in the ten years still to come? Would any well reknowned physcist or expert want to be left out of what could become one of the most historical moments in human civilization to-date?
Have you read further into the wikipedia (Not incredibly reliable anyway) article that you have also added to your post? Just a couple sentences after it mentions the reality TV show (Okay, so I was wrong about that) it says it would estimately cost about $6 Billion US Dollars. $6 Billion dollars is a large number I realize, but not unattainable. Provided below in the spoiler is one way they will plan to raise money for the trip:
Spoiler :
Mars One has only received initial sponsorship money so far and has not yet begun the global reality-TV media event which is intended to provide most of the funds for the trip to Mars. Corporate sponsorship money will be used mostly to fund the conceptual design studies provided by the aerospace suppliers.[7] On 31 August 2012, company officials announced that funding from its first sponsors had been received.[7] Sponsors for Mars One include:[7][8]
Byte Internet (Dutch internet service provider)
VBC Notarissen (Dutch law firm)
MeetIn (Dutch consulting company)
New-Energy.tv (Dutch web station)
Dejan SEO (Australian search engine optimization company)
Intrepid Research & Development (U.S. engineering company)[9]
Gerald W. Driggers (author of The Earth-Mars Chronicles)[9]
AdKnowledge (Advertiser marketplace)[10]
Aleph Objects, Inc. (developer and manufacturer of rapid prototyping 3D printers)[11]
Byte Internet (Dutch internet service provider)
VBC Notarissen (Dutch law firm)
MeetIn (Dutch consulting company)
New-Energy.tv (Dutch web station)
Dejan SEO (Australian search engine optimization company)
Intrepid Research & Development (U.S. engineering company)[9]
Gerald W. Driggers (author of The Earth-Mars Chronicles)[9]
AdKnowledge (Advertiser marketplace)[10]
Aleph Objects, Inc. (developer and manufacturer of rapid prototyping 3D printers)[11]
Don't forget that these are only initial sponsors. It is foreseen that they will acquire more sponsorships later on.
Well, those bits and bobs are being speculated upon by subcontractors, which does not only include space agencies. It includes this motley crew, which does have some big names (SpaceX, Paragon, Alenia) but also some dubious new faces (Astrobotic, Surrey). And it makes no mention of concrete plans vis a vis being promised all components for the mission - these are simply those groups that sent "letters of interest."
The big thing Mars One has going for it is its ambitious pitch. But if it can't convince those suppliers and its sponsors that all are going to play ball, it's going to fall apart fast.
Yes, the sponsors for the components have mostly only sent "letters of interest" back. I'm not denying it. But once again think about how new the organization's mission is. Mars One has only just recently got around to visiting the suppliers, December 27 of 2012 to be exact. They are only a few weeks into asking the sponsors. I'm sure that none of those companies want to just jump right into anything, they will want to carefully go through all their options and opportunities first.
Yes, so I misunderstood that part. I understood that they intended to have around four 24/7/365 live camera feeds being broadcasted back to earth
constantly for anyone to view. And what would be so bad about educating the audience (the globe) about what it takes to live in such a hostile and new environment and how lucky they are to have the utilities that they use everyday.
The bottom line is that while it'd be nice to have every space agency and aerospace firm get along and band together in one virtuous mission, it is unrealistic to expect it on such flimsy bases as "humans have done great things before, like the pyramids and indoor plumbing." Any other model you propose for the mission must either admit a profit margin or be heavily government-funded: the former is, has been, and will continue to be impossible for the foreseeable future; the latter gives us no more than what we have now. Which is a lot, but not enough.
I understand that it would be a trying task to keep everyone happy. Also, I recognize the difference in inventing indoor plumbing and colonizing a new planet. The mission does not require a profit margin. For example the Apollo Program did not have a profit margin. Instead it spent millions and billions of dollars trying to compete with the Russian space program. Neither does the program have to be heavily government funded. There are quite a few billionaire corporations and industries around the globe, and even if they only have the support of millionaires, figures will eventually add up if they get enough sponsors.
e: I should add that I'd love to be proven wrong on this, and I'd love it if Mars One worked out like the Apollo Program (is a grand success); but the Apollo Program was a heavily regimented, ordered, and exceedingly well-funded government project that was given major priority by every upwards-facing aspect of the most powerful economic, militaristic, and technological authority of the time. Mars One has not so much going for it. Engineering for space is incredibly complicated, and the type of deep-space exploration this mission demands has never been accomplished by any official partner or supplier or sponsor of the Mars One group. It's simply far too much to expect.
I think everyone here in the CFC forums would absolutely rejoice if we were successful in settling mars (Or even just getting there). Yes, the Apollo Program was as you put it, "exceedingly well-funded government project that was given major priority by every upwards-facing aspect of the most powerful economic, militaristic, and technological authority of the time." But one of the things that I believe they are trying to do is to degovernmentize (New word

And is anyone else thinking that setting up a permanent colony before the first human landing has even taken place is... grossly irresponsible? Or am I just uninformed about the current, sorry state of the world's non-robotic space programs?
Well Iggy, setting up a permanent settlement is the only way to get it done. Not only would it be ridiculously expensive to reach orbit there, but its tough enough to reach orbit here. It would be like trying to take off with a rocket that would carry another rocket on top and a lander capable of bringing it down safely to the martian surface without using the return rocket's fuel. Then the return rocket would have to enter obit around a planet that we have never returned from from the ground as of yet and still make it back to earth with a capsule capable of surviving the atmosphere. It's much simpler and less expensive to just have them stay there permanently.