Golden1Knight
Emperor
The luck of the Americans is that they do not have compulsory recruitment. If my country engage in a war, I would be forced to participate. Something similar occurs in Israel, by what I heard.
No, if we don't intervene, we get the Middle East and still have China. If we do, we get a Vietnam and still have China. There is nothing particularly impressive about the Islamic State. At present in our rogue's gallery it rates as if Egghead had somehow wound up in Christopher Nolan's Batman films.If we don't intervene, we get a China. If we do, we get a Vietnam. And either way, thanks Obama. >=(
the creation & maintenance of a free market requires more state intervention than most of us on this planet are comfortable with
The free market requires no creation. It exists naturally. This NES forum for example, is a free market of ideas. Intervention would destroy the freedom.
The Iraq War was about liberating oil supplies to reduce the global price of oil. We did not go to Iraq to kill terrorists or stop terrorism or make the world a safer place, although that was how the public was sold on the affair. Nothing about the rise of ISIS or Al Qaeda in Iraq or any of the other groups has any reflection on the success, or lack thereof, of our policy objectives in Iraq. The intended mission was in fact accomplished (and also totally unnecessary).
I hear FreedomQuest is the next big YOGSCAST Minecraft thing. They previewed it and everything.Though to be fair, I guess we should stop calling it Iraq War II: Quest for Freedom
Pretty sure the default state of humanity is less a free market and more a barter economy.
The free market requires no creation. It exists naturally. This NES forum for example, is a free market of ideas. Intervention would destroy the freedom.
I'm going to go back in time and throttle Adam Smith because I suppose that is about as likely to happen as free market uber alles advocates ever going away.
Calling for the quantification of suffering. There are at most 40,000 Yazidis in those mountains under apparent threat of death. There are 10 million or so Uighurs and 6.2 million Tibetans in the PRC according to the 2010 census.I'm definitely open to hearing what is worse than the active pursuit of genocide. Yes, ISIS isn't attempting to unlock the seventh seal and release a horde of demons into the world, but it's hard to imagine things getting much worse.
The PRC admits to killing at least twice as many people as the number of Yazidis apparently under threat. Ignoring all the other information about Tibet (and other inhabitants of the PRC) before and since, this single incident alone makes the PRC at least twice as bad as ISIS in intent and several hundred times worse in practice.Reprisals for the 1959 Tibetan uprising involved the killing of 87,000 Tibetans by the Chinese count, according to a Radio Lhasa broadcast of 1 October 1960, although Tibetan exiles claim that 430,000 died during the Uprising and the subsequent 15 years of guerrilla warfare, which continued until the US withdrew support.
Where is your advocacy of US Marines landing in Shanghai? How will the US respond to its own genocides against Native Americans, among others?
How is that relevant? Those deaths aren't in consideration; there is nothing that can be done to save lives now. 40,000 Yazidis, now, are in trouble.