qoou
Emperor
- Joined
- Dec 13, 2007
- Messages
- 1,991
EU3 is a better game.

Spoiler :
Higher income, but less obvious/striking

EU3 is a better game.
You don't say?
It was made later, and has had four expansions. I'm pretty sure is going to be better.
EU3 is a better game.
That's an opinion. I personally love EU2, to me it is purer, more elegant, more realistic, more immersive, and has a beautiful interface and world map, and admittedly has a lot of nostalgia behind it. EU3 was to me rather clunky, full of immersion-breaking ridiculous game situations (much more than EU2 - have you seen any AAR that makes remotely any sense 100 years into the game?), and has a bloated resource-hogging 3D engine for ABSOLUTELY NO REASON leading to a world map that looks like some noob's first effort at painting with vectors.
EDIT: AGCEEP mod for EU2 is a must, however. Maybe mods and expansions fix a lot of things for EU3, but I don't care
EDIT: I also feel the same way about MTW and MTW2 - the sequel was enjoyable, but never as immersive to me as the original, which always survives on all my hard drives alongside EU2.
I think the difference here is that EU2 is event hardcoded and EU3 is not. Besides the fact that the game world is larger and the system is less of a board game. I never understood why you couldn't view military units in the political map mode. EU3 is not a resource hog by any stretch of the imagination. It may have been when it was first released, but the full game with all expansions is a beautiful experience that blows EU2 out of the water 10 times out of 10. EU4 is looking to be EVEN better.
HOw did you possibly finish that? I would have just given up halfway through because I'd get so sick of the constant Badboy wars. Thats why I like Vicky. You can play countries which just sort of sit around and industrialise for 70 years straight. Its kind of relaxing.