While We Wait: Writer's Block & Other Lame Excuses

Status
Not open for further replies.
This time you're bad at reading comprehension. My "silent majority" remark had naught to do with player relationship to the polity being played, it was a comment on my belief that the majority of NESers prefer to be able to play an NES without interfacing directly with a spreadsheet.

That happens to be why it was an edited-in afterthought.
 
S.D. always out to tell people they're wrong. Good job bro! Well done.

Moderator Action: Please don't feed the troll
 
This time you're bad at reading comprehension. My "silent majority" remark had naught to do with player relationship to the polity being played, it was a comment on my belief that the majority of NESers prefer to be able to play an NES without interfacing directly with a spreadsheet.

That happens to be why it was an edited-in afterthought.
No, actually, you did very much infer it by 1. lumping them all together as if they were one thing, and 2. by calling it the "established system." When you call something an "established system," LoE, that means that everyone agrees that there is a system, which they clearly don't. See, words have meaning. You were tacitly linking it back to the silent majority, which by the way, you also merely assume exists for spreadsheets, just like you assumed it existed for an understanding of the relationship. You're 0:1 on assumptions so far.

e: Oh, yeah, and before you get any bright ideas? Since literally nobody has been advocating making players use spreadsheets, if you want to make a poll to prove me wrong like I just did you? It'd need a poll question like "Would it upset you if your mod used spreadsheets to arrive at results in an update, either in part or in full?" P.S. The answer will overwhelmingly be "No," because most of this forum already plays in games that do precisely that.

S.D. always out to tell people they're wrong. Good job bro! Well done.
Nobody asked for your opinion, just like nobody has ever asked for it. Feel free to keep getting involved in things that don't concern you though.
 
Don't tell me what I meant to say and don't put words in my mouth.

I have no interest in indulging your ridiculous complex about this forum. This has gone well beyond the bounds of an intellectual argument or even disagreement.

Moderator Action: Use the report function. Don't feed the troll
 
So what exactly did you mean by "established system" then? It's clearly neither systemic nor established! I'll take a refusal to answer as an acknowledgment you're just abusing the English language.

Moderator Action: I can't see past the fact that your last few posts are almost entirely devoted to trolling LoE and provoking a negative response. Please find a less personal way to express your opinions.
 
Fascism is happening.

Rampant socio-economic inequality is happening.

Capitalism is not the problem. I propose we need to rework the central banking system so it doesn't lead to exponential monopolisation of everything.
 
Fascism is happening.

Rampant socio-economic inequality is happening.

Capitalism is not the problem. I propose we need to rework the central banking system so it doesn't lead to exponential monopolisation of everything.

1) Not important- or at least not nearly as much as point two.
2) Agree- and this is very important.
3) Disagree. (and surprisingly- agree with Luckymoose again (ahhhhh!))

Predatory wealth accumulation/hoarding is a consequence of capitalism. I propose that ultimately, capitalism and democracy are not compatible.
 
Fascism is happening.

Rampant socio-economic inequality is happening.

Capitalism is not the problem. I propose we need to rework the central banking system so it doesn't lead to exponential monopolisation of everything.

I propose we try to read and learn about the way things work before devolving into histrionics on internet message boards.
 
Not sold. Proposing we should trade economic instability for even more coercive violence from government doesn't fly with me.
The following is a transcription of the audio from 10:12 to 10:40: "I don't see us debating and discussing this. I don't have the solutions—I think I know what the nature of the problem is. And unless we're prepared to have a very broad-based discussion that gets away from, you know, the normal kind of pablum you get in the political campaign, and, you know 'Everything's going to be OK here next year if you vote for me', it's crap. You should know it's crap. And—and—and say it is. And—and we have a duty, it seems to me, those of us who are academics and seriously involved in the world to actually change our mode of thinking."

A stirring cry for fascism and government repression if I've ever heard one.
 
He refers to Marx and calls himself a Marxist. I am simply connecting dots.
 
Guess I better turn myself into the FBI and get ready to go before the Senate Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations, I had to read Marx as part of a course in college and can also refer to his ideas. The Communist taint is spreading.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom