erez87
Lord of Random
You mean the game theory YouTube channel?
Here's the problem.
Take SysNES or CNES. Those who care will optimize extensively, gaining significant in-game advantage and making spreadsheet use mandatory.
How is that different from studying the period, looking for successful economic examples, writing specific stories for targeted bonuses and playing shrewdly? Everything can be optimized. People invest different amounts of time and expect different returns.
Creating enjoyable NESes is a morale boosting influence, I'd imagine. Maybe not to trolls, but without NESes the NESing community would cease to be. Every time I have brought myself back into the community I have contributed meaningfully by running my own NES. Not just spammed the WWW thread like some others.
If moving this thread to the Off-Topic section would decrease the amount of attention the NESing community gives to trolls that do not actually contribute while they complain and troll in this thread, I cannot see a downside.
1. No model can accurately represent the world.
2. Every model thus has to make approximations and abstractions, as design compromises.
3. Any design compromise can be exploited, in ways the mod did not intend.
4. This leads to gamey choices in play, that optimize to the system and not to the setting.
I almost finished reading the entire adventure. So I need to ask people some stuff: You guys prefer we type everything in a chat, or are you all Ok with doing a game by voice? I feel like chatting the adventure would not be as fun as voicing it.
Also how would people feel about 4-5pm IDT (which is UTC+2 so 2-3PM UTC). And considering I need 3-5 people, do we have five interested folks?
Thank you, that was very helpful, I didn't know that.Rule #1 for running premade adventures: Don't read it like a script.
But do you read it like a script?You can read it like a script if you're good at reading scripts!
(I'm good at reading scripts.)
Suppose you are actually the immortal godlike non-Human entity that has been ruling this nation since time immemorial or the gestalt consciousness of the executive branch of government or the sum total embodiment of the zeitgeist of the nation or whatever (not explicitly defining the player's relation to their "character" is another thing NES has dragged its feet on for literally more than a decade)
Even so, I think a certain silent majority shares this sentiment.
EDIT: As soon as you start railing against the established system of the player's relationship to the country ("gestalt consciousness" "sum of the zeitgeist," whatever) my hand is already against you.
Guess what, Nixon, the data is in and I'm calling you out on your silent majority argument, especially since you couldn't even be bothered to respond to the prompt: numbers say there's no clear consensus as to how people approach their position to their nations. What do you make of that one?If you would please, define for me what the player's relationship to the player character is in NES, Lord of Elves.