1. We have added a Gift Upgrades feature that allows you to gift an account upgrade to another member, just in time for the holiday season. You can see the gift option when going to the Account Upgrades screen, or on any user profile screen.
    Dismiss Notice

Why do Marxists have a superior grasp on history?

Discussion in 'Off-Topic' started by Hygro, Feb 22, 2012.

?

Why do Marxists understand history better? Pick just one (sorry!)

  1. To justify Marxism, you have to justify historical particulars, leading to understand history

    65.0%
  2. Having a good grasp of history leads to an understanding of why Marxism is good

    10.0%
  3. Marx, as a Hegelian historian teaches history effectively, so those who study him learn history well

    10.0%
  4. Marx provided linguistic categories for history, leading to historians trapped into Marxist thinking

    2.5%
  5. I am a Marxist who disagrees with the poll's premise, or has another answer..

    12.5%
  1. Traitorfish

    Traitorfish The Tighnahulish Kid

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2005
    Messages:
    32,729
    Location:
    Scotland
     
  2. Cheezy the Wiz

    Cheezy the Wiz Socialist In A Hurry

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    25,238
    Location:
    Freedonia
    I dunno TF, he makes a pretty compelling case. I think my entire undergrad studies might have been refuted.

    As for the OP, I think it is rather that the ideology of Marxism demands that one be knowledgeable about history, and if one is not and finds moral resonance with Marxism nonetheless, then it forces such a background upon them.

    I think another poster asked Marxists which came first for them. For me it was history. As my morals realigned during what I like to call the "Age of Reason," I came in contact with Marxism and found its foundations vindicated, for it helped to explain so much of what I had observed, yet never managed to fully connect the dots or finds the words to express adequately. Rather like Brecht's discovery of Marx, when I think about it, 'cept his was with regards to his plays.
     
  3. Earthling

    Earthling Deity

    Joined:
    Nov 9, 2008
    Messages:
    8,518
    I voted the first option, I think a large part is a strong tendency to study and learn extensively about certain past periods of history.

    I'm not really happy with all the poll options though, certainly this takes more than a simplistic explanation.

    I think my answer is better put that whatever the reason for this, it is the same reason that Marxists, opposed to others who are still roughly socialists/communists/lefists but would refuse the label "Marxist," tend to have the least understanding of science.
     
  4. Commodore

    Commodore Deity

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2005
    Messages:
    12,059
    Marx never said capitalism wasn't necessary. In fact he said quite the opposite. According to Marx, a Communist society is supposed to be part of the natural evolution of human society and would only rise out of a fully developed capitalist society. Now he never stated what constitutes a fully developed capitalist society, but he did say capitalism was a necessary step to achieve Communism.

    So really, to be a true Marxist, one must at least temporarily support a capitalist system in order to eventually achieve the Communist ideal.
     
  5. Cheezy the Wiz

    Cheezy the Wiz Socialist In A Hurry

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    25,238
    Location:
    Freedonia
    Qualifying it as such is not necessary. Marx did not say that a fully developed capitalist society was necessary for socialism, he said that socialism would inevitably arise out of capitalism because of its inherent contradictions. The statement that a society is "ready" for socialism is not one he would have likely understood, he would have likely replied that a society is ready for socialism when its working class is prepared to act in unison to destroy that which makes its society capitalistic.

    A very debatable statement. Marxism is not so deterministic as this.
     
  6. Commodore

    Commodore Deity

    Joined:
    Jun 13, 2005
    Messages:
    12,059
    The point I was trying to make was that for one to amass wealth in a capitalistic manner and then use that wealth to get an education that leads to support for Marxist ideology is not as much of a contradiction as a lot of people would think.

    I was also trying to make the point that capitalism and Marxist ideology do not necessarily need to oppose each other since, if Marx is to be believed, one will invariably lead to the other.
     
  7. Bootstoots

    Bootstoots Deity Retired Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 2, 2003
    Messages:
    9,437
    Location:
    Mid-Illinois
    A superior grasp on history relative to whom, exactly?
     
  8. Murky

    Murky Deity

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2006
    Messages:
    7,216
    Location:
    The Milky Way Galaxy
    They don't have a better grasp of history.
     
  9. woody60707

    woody60707 Deity

    Joined:
    May 16, 2006
    Messages:
    4,588
    Location:
    Chicago, IL
    Why do Apple drones have a superior grasp on history?

    I suspect it's the same answer.
     
  10. Arwon

    Arwon

    Joined:
    Oct 5, 2006
    Messages:
    19,083
    Location:
    Canberra
    The first two. Marxism is grounded in a particular understanding of history. By contrast, the liberalism that informs mainstream contemporary understandings of the world and politics is damn close to being completely a-historical and based instead on a set of principles which are assumed to be universal.

    Oddly they're both fairly teleological and contain an assumption of ongoing progress.
     
  11. Hygro

    Hygro soundcloud.com/hygro/

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2002
    Messages:
    23,541
    Location:
    California
    Of course, I probably should have defined "history", as that means a lot of different things to a lot of people.

    Edit: oh and Dachs, I'd hardly call Berkeley a bastian of Marxism. Centrism (not in an American modern political sense, but in an academic sense) is the ruler of the day. I.E. the perfect example being the economics department is chalk full of a bunch of libertarian leaning Keynesians. You find some personal-Marxists where Marxism doesn't have anything to do with anything (so they don't teach it), like in Classics. The only place where Marxists rule the day is about one third of the geography department.
     
  12. Cheezy the Wiz

    Cheezy the Wiz Socialist In A Hurry

    Joined:
    Jul 18, 2005
    Messages:
    25,238
    Location:
    Freedonia
    Marxists are Apple drones?
     
  13. Skwink

    Skwink FRIIIIIIIIIITZ

    Joined:
    May 14, 2010
    Messages:
    5,682
    Are there any articles on this?
     
  14. BasketCase

    BasketCase Username sez it all

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2004
    Messages:
    13,024
    Location:
    Closer than you'd like
    I second what Azash said on page 1. The thread title is a loaded question.
     
  15. Hygro

    Hygro soundcloud.com/hygro/

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2002
    Messages:
    23,541
    Location:
    California
    No no, I swear, and the poll options are perfectly comprehensive.
     
  16. BasketCase

    BasketCase Username sez it all

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2004
    Messages:
    13,024
    Location:
    Closer than you'd like
    Aha. So they are. Still, I kinda disagree with the way you wrote the thread title. :)

    Personally, I don't think there's a historical precedent to judge by.
     
  17. Agent327

    Agent327 Observer

    Joined:
    Oct 28, 2006
    Messages:
    16,102
    Location:
    In orbit
    I don´t see any posts of Thunderfall on this thread.

    Actually, there are plenty of Marxists with a rather poor grasp on history; and I´m not just thinking of what was considered ´history´ in the Soviet era.

    No, but it´s an equally valid question, given the lack of evidence for the OP question..

    Actually, the poll is; if you´re not a Marxist, you can´t vote.

    Summing up, plenty of theory on this thread and very few - if any - facts. Is that typical for Marxist discussions?
     
  18. amadeus

    amadeus Civ2 / Law and Order!

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2001
    Messages:
    35,543
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Osaka (大阪)
    Because they have such a poor grasp on economics. :mischief:

    NO SUCH THING! :mad:

    Actually, I can't accept the premise that Marxists have a superior grasp on history. I had a few Marxist professors, and of them only a few actually seemed good at what they did. The others all just put everything in Marxian terms, so while they were knowledgeable in Marxism, they lacked any other kind of perspective.

    I'm certain I had a closet libertarian as one of my professors and he was actually the one I would go to with questions. He never discussed anything political, it was just some of the anecdotes that he shared and his general attitude on things that happened to him.
     
  19. Masada

    Masada Koi-san!

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2005
    Messages:
    12,534
    Location:
    Osaka
    dachs isn't a marxist.

    therefore marxists do not have a superior grasp of history.

    QED
     
  20. Tee Kay

    Tee Kay Silly furry

    Joined:
    Aug 21, 2005
    Messages:
    21,983
    Gender:
    Male
    Location:
    Melbourne
    edit: not worth staining my katana.
     

Share This Page