1. We have added a Gift Upgrades feature that allows you to gift an account upgrade to another member, just in time for the holiday season. You can see the gift option when going to the Account Upgrades screen, or on any user profile screen.
    Dismiss Notice

Why do Marxists have a superior grasp on history?

Discussion in 'Off-Topic' started by Hygro, Feb 22, 2012.

?

Why do Marxists understand history better? Pick just one (sorry!)

  1. To justify Marxism, you have to justify historical particulars, leading to understand history

    65.0%
  2. Having a good grasp of history leads to an understanding of why Marxism is good

    10.0%
  3. Marx, as a Hegelian historian teaches history effectively, so those who study him learn history well

    10.0%
  4. Marx provided linguistic categories for history, leading to historians trapped into Marxist thinking

    2.5%
  5. I am a Marxist who disagrees with the poll's premise, or has another answer..

    12.5%
  1. Tarquelne

    Tarquelne Follower of Tytalus

    Joined:
    Dec 8, 2001
    Messages:
    3,715
    Ah. That would be an interesting comparison.
     
  2. Hygro

    Hygro soundcloud.com/hygro/

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2002
    Messages:
    23,541
    Location:
    California
    now there's the real irony :lol:
     
  3. Dachs

    Dachs Hero of the Soviet Union

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2005
    Messages:
    32,588
    Location:
    Moscow
    Marxists do not intrinsically understand history better; that would be ridiculous. Simply put, during the period in which most current and practicing historians were educated, Marxian analysis was the 'in' thing, the fad of the decade. So much of the current historical establishment adheres to some sort of Marxist or quasi-Marxist ideology, or focuses on Marxian analysis, or studies Marxian-associated tropes. Since it generally takes a few (or several, as sometimes seems to be the case for history) decades for fads in any field to percolate into secondary and even undergraduate education, orthodox Marxian thinking dominates history teaching at those levels of learning.

    One imagines that, in 2032 or 2042, AP students and undergraduate history students will be wondering why people who study transnational narratives or the role of contingency in history seem to have a 'superior grasp on history'.
     
  4. Traitorfish

    Traitorfish The Tighnahulish Kid

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2005
    Messages:
    32,729
    Location:
    Scotland
    Do you know many students? :huh:

    Plenty of them have no grasp of history to speak of. Have you ever talked to a Maoist? (Don't talk to a Maoist.)

    In a lot of areas, mind, the Marxian history is the standard one, which complicates things a bit. (There's a lot of work been put in (including by Marxists, [example]) in uprooting some of the less tenable aspects of the Orthodox historiography for just that reason.)
     
  5. ParkCungHee

    ParkCungHee Deity

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2006
    Messages:
    12,921
    The French Revolution, for example, turns every undergrad into a rabid marxist.
     
  6. Traitorfish

    Traitorfish The Tighnahulish Kid

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2005
    Messages:
    32,729
    Location:
    Scotland
    Made all the more absurd by the fact that so much of the Marxist orthodoxy on the Revolution is recycled Jacobinism.
     
  7. ParkCungHee

    ParkCungHee Deity

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2006
    Messages:
    12,921
    Jacobins could make it a paragraph without saying "Middle Class".
     
  8. Traitorfish

    Traitorfish The Tighnahulish Kid

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2005
    Messages:
    32,729
    Location:
    Scotland
    I was thinking more of the uncritical yammering about "feudalism" (which Marx was as guilty of as anyone), but, yeah, there's certainly a "worst of both worlds" thing going on there.
     
  9. warpus

    warpus In pork I trust

    Joined:
    Aug 28, 2005
    Messages:
    51,312
    Location:
    Stamford Bridge
    Marxism isn't a mainstream stance, so if you want to get "into it" you have to first educate yourself.

    Contrast this with something more mainstream.. uhh.. I don't know, whatever. You can turn on the TV and hear talking heads talking about it and tell you what to think. There's no need to educate yourself there.
     
  10. Dachs

    Dachs Hero of the Soviet Union

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2005
    Messages:
    32,588
    Location:
    Moscow
    Have they stopped using The Anatomy of Revolution as the standard textbook yet?
     
  11. Hitro

    Hitro Feistus Raclettus

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2001
    Messages:
    12,335
    Location:
    North German Plain
    Are there seriously people in 2012 still thinking the mainstream of anything would be "Marxist"? :lol:
     
  12. Dachs

    Dachs Hero of the Soviet Union

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2005
    Messages:
    32,588
    Location:
    Moscow
    Hygro went to Berkeley.
     
  13. Hitro

    Hitro Feistus Raclettus

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2001
    Messages:
    12,335
    Location:
    North German Plain
    I rather meant you. The whole stuff about "a generation of Marxist scholars". A weird idea when all you actually hear are market ideologues... :D
     
  14. ParkCungHee

    ParkCungHee Deity

    Joined:
    Aug 13, 2006
    Messages:
    12,921
    I don't know. I managed to skip the French Revolution until I made it to the Grad Level.
     
  15. Traitorfish

    Traitorfish The Tighnahulish Kid

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2005
    Messages:
    32,729
    Location:
    Scotland
    I got a single lecture slide amounting to "this book is basically a load of bollocks", if that's any good to you.
     
  16. Dachs

    Dachs Hero of the Soviet Union

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2005
    Messages:
    32,588
    Location:
    Moscow
    Market ideologues? In scholarly history? Are you nuts? :huh:
     
  17. Hitro

    Hitro Feistus Raclettus

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2001
    Messages:
    12,335
    Location:
    North German Plain
    No.

    More in the pseudo-science economics they created to have a refuge from being called out, indeed. But in history, the idea of "freedom" (since the 90s that means "free market") being an inevitable result of human history is a very common one, too.
    They now again struggle with reality clearly disproving the idea, but they are still kicking strong.
     
  18. Dachs

    Dachs Hero of the Soviet Union

    Joined:
    Feb 23, 2005
    Messages:
    32,588
    Location:
    Moscow
    Wait, so you think Marxian analysis is alive and well in mainstream economics, but that they've been chased out of scholarly history since the fall of the USSR? You do realize that it's the complete opposite in the real world, right?
     
  19. Hitro

    Hitro Feistus Raclettus

    Joined:
    Dec 5, 2001
    Messages:
    12,335
    Location:
    North German Plain
    I do not think Marxist anything is relevant to more than intellectual debate these days. Sadly, perhaps. Perhaps not.

    I do however not get at all how - beyond sheer ideological blindness and paranoia - one could assume that the age we live in, which started in the early 90s, would be a Marxist one. Anywhere. Except for studies of, well, Marxism.
     
  20. CELTICEMPIRE

    CELTICEMPIRE Zulu Conqueror

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2010
    Messages:
    4,405
    Location:
    Eastern Kentucky
    History actually shows that Communism fails, look at the fall of the Iron curtain, and look at how China is becoming successful as it shifts toward Capitalism.
     

Share This Page