Berzerker
Deity
Hillary's got a hit list, a Hitlary
she'sand she voted to invade Iraq because of political aspirations and that backfired
Hillary's got a hit list, a Hitlary
If a guy has a list of people hes not too keen on, no big deal; if a women does, then that is a big deal and then it becomes juicy, said DeFrancesco Soto, a University of Texas professor. This just conjures up memories of the gendered element of when Hillary was running.
Because shes a woman running for political office a very powerful political office we just dont know how to deal with gender yet with her, she later added.
I have two rather good reasons really. And for quips and shingles two why you shouldn't.Can someone explain to me why, if I'm a blank slate, I should vote for Hillary in 2016?
Unless you forgot that opposition to the ACA started astroturfed and corporate funded and that the Republican Congress has made it their mandate (stated, btw) to oppose Obama on everything, abandoning their own platform when the President supports it, all with the hopes of creating exactly the atmosphere that leads a select minority of Americans like yourself to see it as the President's fault, then I think we're going to have some trouble communicating.Unless doctors continue to increasingly stop taking new Medicaid patients because they just can't afford to do it after a point. Are those doctors operating on "ideological grounds" as well?
And I mean, if you're being forced to pay for a more expensive policy to get crap you don't and aren't getting subsidized as many of friends are and a heck of a lot of people are, why should they thank a President who said, in unequivocal terms, that would not happen? It was a total lie.
I wanted to not turn this into an Obamacare debate there's already a thread for that.
And I don't even know how to address the other claims beyond how I did above. He's biown up multiple instances where there actually was common ground by storming in and demanding it gets done his way or not at all. Just because he goes out and misrepresents the other side doean't make him a great compromiser. Like unemployment insurance, Republicans have said they would have plenty of votes to get to 60 if the extension is paid for. Obama decides it would be helpful to run around and complain Republicans want a million people to lose their unemployment insurance. This is the guy that ushered in a new era of "civility" and wants to lecture us? Whenever there's gridlock, it's usually caused by both parties being stubbon. If Republicans block all sorts of crap,Reid refuses to bring all sorts of crap to the floor for political purposes, and Obama has no leadership ability to even get his own party to listen to him(see:iran sanctions) then that's widespread dysfunction.
I am strongly in favor of a governor, yes. I prefer someone who has previous experience with running and managing an executive branch, which is one reason I liked Romney more than McCain.
Most of them have had to deal with the realities of working with a legislative branch that isn't always a rubber stamp and having to build personal relationships with members of the legislature.
...
We've had many successful presidents who used to be governors, some who were VP, and some who were members of the House. I can't think of many Senators who were successful Presidents or even elected President at all(Warren G. Harding? lol).
This is something that the current President has unfortunately failed at even according to many Democrats. They feel like he doesn't even talk to them most of the time. ...
This is not to say there isn't obstructionism by Republicans on some things, of course. But the bottom line is while Obama enjoys campaigning, he fails utterly at the actual governing part of governance.
I can't vote in the Democratic primary, as I think you have to be a registered Democrat to do so in my state, but at least Schweitzer has some moderate positions and is willing to call out Obama on his corporatism. This is why I want to punch every talking head who asks why the stock market is doing so well and the job market is ass. People seem to think you can't favor the ultra-rich and demonize the "regular" rich(yes that sounds dumb but it's the best term I could think of).
I definitely agree that the Republican candidate is important in the outcome but as I mentioned above I wouldn't even know who to try and evaluate. Christie has issues that go far beyond the bridge scandal(which was a legitimate scandal but imo still peanuts compared to many Obama scandals for which no one has really been held accountable). Who the hell else is there? Honestly as much as people try to demonize Scott Walker he's managed to survive a recall election with a bigger margin of victory than his initial election and actually accomplished things that Democrats would traditionally dislike in a state that hasn't voted for a Republican president since Reagan.
This feels like standard political machine procedure
The only major Obama-era scandal I can think of that involved use of government resources to target political opposition was the IRS thing, which turned out to not be much of a scandal at all since lefty groups were targeted as well and based on the actual wording of the statute none of the 501(c)(4) organizations should have been given tax-exempt status in the first place, but that mistake was made in the freakin' Eisenhower administration so it's not like that was Obama's fault.
"While we have multiple sources of information corroborating the use of Tea Party and other related criteria we described in our report, including employee interviews, e-mails, and other documents, we found no indication in any of these other materials that 'Progressives' was a term used to refer cases for scrutiny for political campaign intervention."
"In comparison, our audit found that 100 percent of the tax-exempt applications with Tea Party, Patriots, or 9/12 in their names were processed as potential political cases during the timeframe of our audit,"
The IRS categorized the groups as engaging in several advocacy-related activities that could have barred them from tax-exempt status, such as lobbying and "propaganda."
But the word "propaganda" doesn't appear in section 501(c)(4), which governs the social welfare status that most Tea Party groups were applying for, said John Colombo, a law professor at the University of Illinois. Instead, it appears in section 501(c)(3), which governs public charities.
"There would be no reason I would think to flag them if it's for a 501(c)(4) status," Colombo said. "That's very odd to me."
I'm not "defending" anybody. I'm merely pointing out the hypocrisy of trying to attack her credentials while basically ignoring presidential candidates who have far less basic experience with the federal government.You're defending Hillary by comparing her to other politicians that LC also does not like. That... doesn't really work.
Indeed. Given our hopelessly broken two-party system, we again get to decide whether or not we want vanilla or strawberry ice cream.I very much appreciate the spirit of the OT - but you forgot the strongest factor which will determine the attractiveness of Hillary as President. Which will be the Republican candidate. In no other system of choice is the choice itself so irrelevant and the difference between choices so relevant as in a binary system.
I'm not "defending" anybody. I'm merely pointing out the hypocrisy of trying to attack her credentials while basically ignoring presidential candidates who have far less basic experience with the federal government.
What possibly gives you the impression I support her? The only way she would likely be in any way attractive would be as the lesser of two evils.Aren't you supposed to argue in favor of Hillary?![]()
Try nearly all of them for decades. You can start with an ex-B-movie actor who is idolized by the right-wing authoritarians and work your way right up to Sarah Palin and Michelle Bachmann.I've said before(though maybe not in this thread) the entire field sucks balls, that's not really "ignoring" them. If you can show me the chosen anointed Republican candidate whose credentials we're not supposed to question, I'll gladly take a swing at him/her.
This statement from the report was debunked long ago:I'm a bit pressed for time but I can say this; the extent to which progressive groups were "targeted" was exaggerated if it existed at all. Many of them were "Targeted" only in the sense that a cop targets a bank robber committing a robbery.
And as far as his supposed impartiality is concerned:The inspector general also pushed back against allegations that he ignored documents showing that the agency also flagged liberal groups for extra review by explaining that the documents were not originally made available to his office when it was conducting its audit.
“I am disturbed that these documents were not provided to our auditors at the outset, and we are currently reviewing this issue,” George said.
The July 2010 document was only sent to the inspector general last week, he said.
George, a former Bob Dole staffer who contributed to GOP candidates before assuming his inspector general post nearly a decade ago, worked to recast the picture that Democrats have tried to paint of him as a Republican operative.
“They don’t know I was a page at the 1980 Democratic National Convention and that I was a founder of the Howard University College Democrats,” George told lawmakers. “Yes, I saw the light and joined Bob Dole’s staff … but anyone who has worked with me on either side of the spectrum will agree I call it as I see it.”
George’s approach did little to soothe Democratic suspicions.
“The more we look at him, the more we need to explain his professional credibility,” Rep. Gerry Connolly (D-Va.) told POLITICO. “I would start by getting a new inspector general. He has so compromised his credibility with at least half of us that it makes it almost impossible for him to go forward with his job.”
What possibly gives you the impression I support her? The only way she would likely be in any way attractive would be as the lesser of two evils.
Try nearly all of them for decades. You can start with an ex-B-movie actor who is idolized by the right-wing authoritarians and work your way right up to Sarah Palin and Michelle Bachmann.
What possibly gives you the impression I support her? The only way she would likely be in any way attractive would be as the lesser of two evils.