Traitorfish
The Tighnahulish Kid
This would be a more interesting question without the "for Hilary" bit.
aw, c'mon, somebody was going to say it sooner or later.
aw, c'mon, somebody was going to say it sooner or later.
This is why I said "breakdown", not "spreadsheet".
If I wanted you to look at just the spreadsheet, wouldn't I have just linked to the spreadsheet?
It would help if the IRS had actually been cooperative in this from the beginning rather than trying to wash it away with a planted question at a conference and obstructing afterwards.
I should've thrown the USA Today article in too(my bad) in which it explains more, including that while there were 11 liberal groups caught, over 80% of the target groups were conservative and how the 501(c)(4) wasn't/clearly shouldn't have been an issue in some of them:
I'm sorry but I couldn't NOT post this in the relevant thread:
I think the New York Times is trying to tell us we should vote for Hillary so she doesn't crash into Termina and destroy it in 3 days
Spoiler :![]()
I'm tempted to say it's from the 2008 Democratic Primaries.Is that from 2008 or for 2016?
Because if you don't you're a sexist prick.
Republicans only hope is to roll out condie rice because racist, sexist prick trumps sexist prick.
(Also because whoever the republicans roll out might be a bumbling fool like McCain. McCain was soooo bad he made Obama look appealing by comparison to me. Third party is just wasting your vote sadly)
Wait, McCain was bad? What about the bumbling moron they wheeled out beside him?
But on the criteria of being a bumbling fool there's no contest. She was special.
I think Joe Biden would give anyone a run for their money in that category.