Why Should I Vote For Hillary?

This would be a more interesting question without the "for Hilary" bit.


aw, c'mon, somebody was going to say it sooner or later.
 
I'm sorry but I couldn't NOT post this in the relevant thread:

I think the New York Times is trying to tell us we should vote for Hillary so she doesn't crash into Termina and destroy it in 3 days :confused:

Spoiler :
26cover_sometext-master495-v2.jpg
 
I was wondering where this thread was...

This is why I said "breakdown", not "spreadsheet".

If I wanted you to look at just the spreadsheet, wouldn't I have just linked to the spreadsheet?

It would help if the IRS had actually been cooperative in this from the beginning rather than trying to wash it away with a planted question at a conference and obstructing afterwards.

I should've thrown the USA Today article in too(my bad) in which it explains more, including that while there were 11 liberal groups caught, over 80% of the target groups were conservative and how the 501(c)(4) wasn't/clearly shouldn't have been an issue in some of them:

I think you have misunderstood that particular criticism of the scandal (and a skim of your linked articles does not address this complaint unless it was buried somewhere). The statutory language for 501(c)(4) organizations from way back says they must be exclusively social welfare organizations, whereas that has been interpreted by the IRS as primarily social welfare organizations. The wording is important, because the IRS basically allows a 49% political advocacy, 51% social welfare organization to have the same tax benefits a 100% social welfare organization does.

Exactly, identically, zero of these organizations whether lefty or righty should have received 501(c)(4) status under the plain text of the law. Nobody can blame Obama, Bush or any other recent guy for this--the mistake was made back in the 1950s but is only now being exploited.

I'm sorry but I couldn't NOT post this in the relevant thread:

I think the New York Times is trying to tell us we should vote for Hillary so she doesn't crash into Termina and destroy it in 3 days :confused:

Spoiler :
26cover_sometext-master495-v2.jpg

I don't know why I haven't seen a Majora's Mask meme of this yet, it's perfect for it.
 
Because if you don't you're a sexist prick.

Republicans only hope is to roll out condie rice because racist, sexist prick trumps sexist prick.

(Also because whoever the republicans roll out might be a bumbling fool like McCain. McCain was soooo bad he made Obama look appealing by comparison to me. Third party is just wasting your vote sadly)
 
How many other candidates have their own planet? Or such a significant gravitational pull? The choice is clear.
 
Because if you don't you're a sexist prick.

Republicans only hope is to roll out condie rice because racist, sexist prick trumps sexist prick.

(Also because whoever the republicans roll out might be a bumbling fool like McCain. McCain was soooo bad he made Obama look appealing by comparison to me. Third party is just wasting your vote sadly)

Dat's da ticket.

Wait, McCain was bad? What about the bumbling moron they wheeled out beside him?

Has that guy ever met a war/intervention he didn't like? Maybe Vietnam. Maybe.
 
But on the criteria of being a bumbling fool there's no contest. She was special.

I think Joe Biden would give anyone a run for their money in that category.
 
Well, this leads to me conclude that the main reason to vote for Hillary is that you give the Democrats an excuse to do the very things we already disliked about the Republicans but we don't care because they are Democrats.
 
Back
Top Bottom