Rhinestone Eyes
Chieftain
- Joined
- Jan 21, 2025
- Messages
- 2
Just wondered peoples view on why the devs are being so secretive with the last modern age civ reveal? Pretty sure Japan, Buganda, France and Mughals were announced a long time ago in the first few dev diaries. I think we've been guessing the last two civs from either Siam, Germany/Prussia or Britain for quite a while now. I know Siam's recently been announced.
My take is they are trying to minimise backlash by two big player bases (big civ7 buying populations) both hoping/ expecting their country will be in the base game as with previous titles, as the prospect of a modern age without Germany/ Prussia or Britain seems a bit mad probably to most people?
It all seems a bit strange when Ed Beach started off the Civ7 hype with the first IGN preview and BBC article talking about London and its historical layers being an inspiration for the new ages approach and seemingly telling at least two separate journalists that Rome-Normans-England would be in the game. Perhaps it's not Ed's fault and journalists just made assumptions that he didn't correct. Of course he could have planned for England/ Britain to be future paid DLC, but then I'm not sure what he was hoping to gain by being a bit misleading and not just managing expectations if/ when Prussia is finally confirmed as the last civ soon. Is this just coincidence or do you think it's planned to try and get people to pre-order before they get a nasty surprise at having to pay more for either Prussia or Britain in future? Or worse the Normans representing Britain and no plans for a modern Britain civ? Or is a curve ball coming and both are in? Pretty sure though Ed confirmed 30 civs + Shawnee a long time ago?
I would be interested in other peoples views
My take is they are trying to minimise backlash by two big player bases (big civ7 buying populations) both hoping/ expecting their country will be in the base game as with previous titles, as the prospect of a modern age without Germany/ Prussia or Britain seems a bit mad probably to most people?
It all seems a bit strange when Ed Beach started off the Civ7 hype with the first IGN preview and BBC article talking about London and its historical layers being an inspiration for the new ages approach and seemingly telling at least two separate journalists that Rome-Normans-England would be in the game. Perhaps it's not Ed's fault and journalists just made assumptions that he didn't correct. Of course he could have planned for England/ Britain to be future paid DLC, but then I'm not sure what he was hoping to gain by being a bit misleading and not just managing expectations if/ when Prussia is finally confirmed as the last civ soon. Is this just coincidence or do you think it's planned to try and get people to pre-order before they get a nasty surprise at having to pay more for either Prussia or Britain in future? Or worse the Normans representing Britain and no plans for a modern Britain civ? Or is a curve ball coming and both are in? Pretty sure though Ed confirmed 30 civs + Shawnee a long time ago?
I would be interested in other peoples views