A) They had three years and spent
over $500 billion to build it and this is the result.
B) The deadlines before people are punished for not using the system they built are approaching much faster than the estimates I've seen for fixing the issues it has.
Actually, it is $500 million for the website.
If they are still having major issues 2 weeks after going live, the technical glitches might be very serious indeed.
I suppose one could enter in their info and see if things are improving each day.
https://www.healthcare.gov/
Though assuredly the IRS will notice those who apply with real info and fail to make it to the end.
They'll have a nice list of people who need taxing when the mandate penalty rolls around.
Here is the real thing to be watching in my opinion:
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/..._4118041.html?utm_hp_ref=politics&ir=Politics
The urgency is underscored not only by the fact that the low-income Americans and the 48 million uninsured -- those whom the law was primarily intended to benefit -- won't get the help they were promised. There's also the plight of those who currently have coverage they bought themselves that now has to be replaced, said Laszewski, who is president of Alexandria, Va.-based Health Policy and Strategy Associates. That represents about 3.6 percent of the population, according to census data.
Many health insurance products currently on the market don't meet Obamacare's benefit standards and consumer protections so they are being discontinued. Consumers with these plans are the most likely to see rate increases next year, especially if they earn too much to get tax credits. "They've got to convert to a new policy -- no ifs, ands or buts about it," Laszewski said.
And while people who currently pay for their own health insurance are likely to do whatever they can to remain covered, buying a plan directly from an insurance carrier or using a private online broker isn't what Obamacare promised, and tax-credit subsidies aren't available without the federal system. Moreover, these private companies aren't prepared to deal with millions of customers who were supposed to be using the government marketplace, Laszewski said.
Under these circumstances, the lion's share of the people who do whatever is necessary to sign up through HealthCare.gov are likely to be the sickest and most expensive to cover because they have the greatest need, Laszewski said. That would make the pool of people covered very costly, causing health insurers to lose money and likely rethink whether they want to participate in the exchanges, he said. "The fundamental threat to Obamacare is we don't get enough healthy people in the pool to keep the rates reasonable, and they are in grave danger of that problem," he said.
If these problems persist longer -- weeks, months, a whole year -- the entire Obamacare project falls apart, Laszewski said
From what I can tell and understand so far, there appears to be real potential here for an ugly positive feedback loop.
With Obamacare subsidies, only the 1st year is hard to pay for.
After that, you get a big check and each following year health care premiums become affordable if you apply the money towards health insurance premiums again.
If only the doggedly determined very sick people sign up the first year, and the young healthy lot choose the $95 fine, then insurance companies will lose money the first year and have to raise premiums.
The 2nd year, young people notice everything is finally running smoothly, but the premiums have gone up even more. Would young people swing $250 or $300 a month for a year in the promise of a 3/4th or 90% refund after a year? Maybe when the fine for not having health insurance reaches $600, but that is year 3. Hopefully they've been taught basic finance and to delay instant gratification by our public school system.
If the government will send you a check if your premiums are beyond 2-9% of your annual income depending on what you made, the sky is the limit on premiums if Uncle Sam pays for the rest and we get into a positive feedback loop on prices.
Does anyone have a handle yet on what the deductible is on these plans currently?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deductible
And for 3.6% of the population, no you can't keep your current plan.
