Which is why the identity and resources of the attacker would be good to know, hmm?Not really, no. Anti submarine warfare is good, but against modern subs, like the relatively inexpensive German export subs, the advantage rests with the subs unless the attacking navy is extremely good. And that really means that there's only a handful of navies that can attack a place that is defended by several good subs without taking devastating losses.
Most people don't want to win Pyrrhic victories, thanks.I would use guerrilla tactics. The limits on manpower and equipment would not allow any kind of conventional defenses to last for very long against a moderately powerful invasion force, but the mountains and forests are perfect for ambushes and harassment.
Which is why the identity and resources of the attacker would be good to know, hmm?
Most people don't want to win Pyrrhic victories, thanks.
I'm not saying it doesn't work in certain circumstances, I'm saying that it's definitely not something that I'd instantly opt for, much less the sole alternative, and we still don't know whether the war will be against a Great Power or not. Besides, even asymmetric warfare isn't a guaranteed win. Ask the Boers and the Basmachis.Hey, if a tiny power is attacked by a great power, guerrilla warfare is the only thing that works. Go ask Vietnam.
Spearmen, in enough numbers they can defeat tanks.
Amphibious war elephants too.
I'd probably spam caravels as well to deal with battleships.