Yes he did. Go to page 2 and you will see for yourself.
Fair enough, the coding of the quote was faulty though.
And he wasn't really talking to you.
No offence intended? That's exactly what you intended. It would be impossible for me to work as an English translator if there was even the slightest doubt as to the quality of my English. To suggest that my English is that of a non-native speaker is absurd and can only be intended as a veiled insult. (I'm British by the way). If you really believe there is something wrong with my English then prove your point: feel free to PM me with a point-by-point analysis of my grammatical and spelling errors (good luck), or anything you feel sounds unnatural. I can do the same for you if you like.
No, I honestly didn't mean any offense. Some of your sentence construction just looks unnatural to me, and I thought that could explain why there were so many misunderstandings with your posts. I sincerely apologize if you took any offense at that, but that was my honest impression.
That said, my original point stands: if so many people aren't understanding the points you're trying to make, it just may be because you're posting your points poorly.
Ah, I see, so you are the supreme guardian of good reasoning. Does it not occur to you that your reasoning might be faulty? Whether or not somebody's reasoning is faulty is highly subjective.
It is. And I think your points and your arguments are extremely faulty. Thus I point that out.
It is the height of arrogance to assume that all your opinions and reasons are correct. A truly intelligent person understands that he does not hold all knowledge and is willing to engage in discussions with other people to arrive at the truth, not to impose his beliefs on others.
I fully agree.
None of that means we can't criticize your arguments though.