China does not recall any significant Virginian presence in Louisiana at the time this betrayal supposedly took place. How does Virginia seem to know what happened? It is clear Virginia has become blinded by its own anti-Georgian propaganda.
Uhmm, its common knowledge. No one is disputing it except Georgia. I don't have to be there to know what happens.
As for France, China had no presence in Europe during the outbreak of the war and thus cannot say what happened. France has always been honest with China in the past however so we see no reason not to believe them now.
Again, there is no "presence" pre-requisite to knowing and understanding a situation. Once China understands this, maybe they can start to have a meaningful impact on the world.
As we stated earlier, it is obvious the real reasons for the Allied losses are their lack of cooperation and trust of one another. Virginia can continue to pass the blame to other nations but this will always remain the fundamental reason for their inability to control the Communist menace.
We have not had cooperation or trust issues during the war. Thus it could not have led to any defeats during the war. Your logic is flawed, and you don't have the facts. Best bet is to stay out of things you do not understand.
Pennsylvania refuses to sign the Treaty of Baton Rouge. Unlike Virginia we do not believe in giving up our allies to the communist horde.
If Virginia would so easily forsake a member of its own alliance, then we see that it would be in our best intrests to remove ourselves from the N.A.T.O. lest Virginia find it to their fancy to betray another member of their alliance.
The fact is, there is little chance of winning a prolonged war against a state with manpower more than triple that of your own. Our only chance at winning this war was a quick defeat in the early parts of the war, to bring it to a close within 2-3 years, when manpower would matter little. Instead our largest army was betrayed by Georgia, which invited the communists in the East Coast and put us on the defensive.
Canada also rejects the standing treaty, and now declares the annexation of the defunct and unlawful Metis Syndicate. Winnpeg and the former nation it was the capitol of shall be part of a revitalized Canadian nation.
If this treaty is approved, and Canada invades the Metis, you face the communists on your own. If you do not cooperate with us, after all we have done for you, than don't expect us to rush to your rescue again.
Virginia is correct in the fact that New France is not in the war. But we are still involved in politics of North America, we cannot outright demand changes to the treaty, but we do have the right to voice our concerns towards political changes to the North American theater.
The treaty gives the UCNA too much power, and as a small and weaker power, New France does not wish to see this treaty passed. Hopefully someone who can make a difference will see this cry and change the treaty so that it is equal.
Also Virginia's claim that New France is not in the war. It is partly correct and partly incorrect, while we have officially declared neutrality in the war, our support still rests with the Allies. New French troops will not and never will go into the war but our support still comes from other places.
Why doesn't New France do more than "voice her concern" over the war? Again, while New France does exist in North America, her inability to step up the plate reduces her opinion to that of a scared puppy. We welcome New French aid and opinion in any war, but not when you cower and shout "unfair" from a corner.
Remember - there are other uses for any New French involvement in the war than just her military.
France declares war on Canada for their intention to annex the Metis nation, a stipulation France made clear to Virginia and her allies as unacceptable. We hope the Virginians will keep good on their promise and denounce this action of Canada's.
Rather hasty, don't you think?