Anonymoose
KING OF MEESE
OOC: We could always invade Alaska and claim it was an accident.![]()
OOC: I don't even think that Sweden would mind at this point.
OOC: We could always invade Alaska and claim it was an accident.![]()
OOC: We could always invade Alaska and claim it was an accident.![]()
Rather hasty, don't you think?
bestrfcplayer said:OOC: Sweden then could invade you and say it was an accident![]()
Uhmm, its common knowledge. No one is disputing it except Georgia. I don't have to be there to know what happens.
Again, there is no "presence" pre-requisite to knowing and understanding a situation. Once China understands this, maybe they can start to have a meaningful impact on the world.
We have not had cooperation or trust issues during the war. Thus it could not have led to any defeats during the war. Your logic is flawed, and you don't have the facts. Best bet is to stay out of things you do not understand.
Obviously Georgia is not the only one disputing it. China disputes what really happened in Louisiana as well and as China, Georgia, Tennessee, and Louisiana were the only none-communist nations present, they are only ones who's word can be considered. Three of the four nations with witnesses at this "betrayal" claim the events transpired differently then you believe.
How can Virginia say there were no cooperation issues when they surrendered their ally to the Communist hordes?
OOC: I do understand how the update works and that what is written is really what happened. I am simply defending my ally, Georgia, in character. Basically we'll deny what happened until we die so I'm not sure if there is a point in debating it with us.![]()
The SUSA has changed its stance on the Treaty of Baton Rouge, and no longer accepts it. After discussing with his advisers, Prestes has realized that his granting approval to the treaty was too hasty. The treaty is flawed in that it does not address the SUSA in any way, and is therefore more a treaty between the UCNA and the Allies. We should never have signed a treaty that did not address ourselves.
In addition, we ask that the UCNA to rescind their support for the Treaty of Baton Rouge, since the treaty does not end the war against the SUSA. For the UCNA to continue to support the treaty would be an abandonment of her Socialist ally, and potentially leaving the SUSA to fend for herself against the Capitalists. However, we will reconsider our stance if the treaty were to address the SUSA and create a peace between the Allies and the SUSA, thus hopefully ending the Yankee-Socialist War (as this war is known in the SUSA).
bestrfcplayer, allow me to explain something to you... your country is nothing more than a backwater swamp compared to New France and many of the North American nations, hell even the world. Any country in North America could overrun Alaska in just a month, a year at most.
You are in no position to angle for power, much less dictate a treaty between superpowers of North America. Even I, New France, cannot dictate such a treaty, the only thing we can do is give our opinion and hope that someone listens. If you want you can ask Sweden to interfere on your behalf, but if you keep acting in this way even Sweden might ignore you.
So in short, know your place and clean up your grammar.
Hi I'm new to these forums. I was recommended to this thread by a friend and would like to eventually participate in this NES. I am subscribing and will try to become familiar with the story and rules so that I will be able to participate at some point.
We'll show you, heck, we'll show you all that we can manage this!
OOC: ( Screw you Commies)
We'll show you, heck, we'll show you all that we can manage this!
OOC: ( Screw you Commies)