Just a teaser: this is what I have been working on the last day; A new Civilopedia tab, "Building Upgrades"
Spoiler :![]()
Useful for people who want to see the big picture.![]()
Just a teaser: this is what I have been working on the last day; A new Civilopedia tab, "Building Upgrades"
Spoiler :![]()
Useful for people who want to see the big picture.![]()
if (pLoopPlot->isHasValidBonus() /*&& pLoopPlot->isConnectedTo(this)*/)
It looks like the bug with stoneworker's hut was fixed. But there is still possiblity of this bug when the realistic culture option is turned on.
Nope, and it won't be save compatible. Sorry.Yep, Revision 136 is the most stable revision I had played so far. Now I had an absolutely beautiful starting place on my map. Though I only have 4 cities at present, I'm preparing for WAR! against nations to my north. I am looking forward to conquer.
So would final official version be appreciable different from revision 136 or not?
Nope, and it won't be save compatible. Sorry.
Clarifying your answer:
No, it is not that much from Revision 136 but whatever is changed still breaks the savegame. Am I right?
So I can play Revision 136 in comfort knowing that final official version won't have anything I will regret not having (a Deaf individual here so excluding that funny audible thingy for someone else)?