dino_yoshi13
Chieftain
- Joined
- May 30, 2013
- Messages
- 93
Has anyone thought that all of these leaders are going to be in the base game and not are there 18 civs to release immediately but 3 of them have two leaders?
3? All I see is two Spains and that's all we've cracked so far.
Do we know the date of that recording, if it was several months ago it is possible that they may not have completely finished all leader choices.
It seems doubtful that they will make two leaders for Spain and we have not yet found a match for E1.
Most likely is that they will make 23 leaders and civ:
18 for base game
1 (Aztec) as pre order bonus and later released to everyone
4 civs, one for each expansion (Delux edition include 4 expansions)
If you add in Civit you get 23 leaders/civs.
It has alphabetical problems unless the theory that each page being self-contained is correct.
However, Zenobia would be amazing.. even cooler than Tamar.
Wait? Did it say Aztecs were preorder bonus in the video? If so, I managed to miss that. Well, that would suck.
Too much of a lack of color. And certainly not an alphabetical fit. Having said that though, I genuinely hope that, alongside Tamar, Zenobia will make it into the game as DLC.
Oh, oops, I was trying to fit in Zenobia in my head! Anyway, my other point still stands.
this link http://imgur.com/a/fwt4f add more color
Not say 100% it is
B5 and C5 seem to every hard to find so unlike the others we can only find something like it and not similar.
Still not enough color. And C5 appears to have a moustache and helmet, and nothing here can explain that.
Regarding E1, I feel it is to generic for us to conclude it is certainly Phillip; the picture in this article of Alvaro de Bazan is an equally good fit for example: http://www.abc.es/historia-militar/20140611/abci-batalla-isla-terceira-mundo-201405291615.html
the key word is appears. the "mustache" can be explained as a shadow etc.
Still not enough color. And C5 appears to have a moustache and helmet, and nothing here can explain that.
Regarding E1, I feel it is to generic for us to conclude it is certainly Phillip; the picture in this article of Alvaro de Bazan is an equally good fit for example: http://www.abc.es/historia-militar/20140611/abci-batalla-isla-terceira-mundo-201405291615.html
Oh, I like to add that I don't feel that way about Julius Caesar; the Roman Empire may have expanded beyond his reign for centuries more, but there is no doubt in my mind that he is the best leader choice for Rome; he is the most iconic Roman leader, one of its greatest military geniuses, and he held unprecedented power over the Romans; what the Roman Empire achieved since would not have been possible were it not for him.