I've tried that, but couldn't get over the limited placement options i.e. the square grid thing. That's how TTD used to do it to, but it was fine in the 90s because all games were like that. Train Fever gives me a ton more flexibility when I'm building, I could never go back to a square grid now.
Video game bragging rights do not easily translate to money or women though, so that currency is useless to me
It was a brilliant idea to put together my map btw, I have been following the design that I posted a couple days ago and so far it has been a success. This is a map of the state of my rail network as of now:
Spoiler:
The new lines added since the last time are the pink and light blue connector lines and the orange and white (light grey in the game actually) high speed lines. They are all pretty much high speed lines I guess but I like calling them different things because that makes things seem more important.
Any dots you see that are touching are stops from different lines stopping at the same station. Most cities so far are able to use their central station for the lines I designed, but on one occasion already I was forced (for a variety of reasons) to build a separate station at the western terminus of the orange line.
The capital also has 3 stations, which actually ended up turning into a brilliant design choice. There's no way all those lines would have been able to go through just 1 station. It was really really tough to connect all those lines like that anyway. I had to destroy a decent chunk of the city to make it happen and screwed with it for several game-time hours, until it all finally fell into place.
What made that more difficult than it has to be, is that I place the following restraints on me when I design my train stations:
1. Trains from different lines do not use any part of the same track or station platform, ever
2. Train track crossings are not allowed to exist anywhere
3. There is a road on each side of the train station, which ends up going all the way around it, connecting in a loop.
If you are wondering why... The first rule just makes each line run a lot more efficiently. The other two rules make it so that the city can expand behind the train station and beyond AND so that I can one day run a tram/streetcar line there. If there were railroad tracks, I couldn't.
These design decisions lead to a lot of bridges and tunnels. Here is what all those lines coming into the capital actually looks like:
Spoiler:
You can see the green, pink, and light grey/white (barely) lines coming into the station on the left, the light blue, orange, and red lines into the station at the top, and the yellow line on the right. These lines run to every single city on the map directly, except for one, which you could reach by passing through 1 other station.
Making this work took a lot of time.
If you're curious, each line eventually sort of breaks off into 2 lines, for trains travelling in each direction. This is done as soon as logistically and physically possible, so some lines break off into 2 right away, while others stay as a single line for a bit longer.
It's now a couple years after I've built these new 4 lines, and the population of the capital jumped from under 650 to just under 1200! This project has basically been a phenomenal success. Right now the light blue line is even by far the most profitable, probably because it was the first to use electric trains as opposed to steam ones. As soon as I saw how successful it was, I also electrified all other lines and upgraded them to trains capable of going up to 200 km/h (up from 120 km/h). So all in all all the dominent domain powers I had to abuse to make this immense project happen were well worth it and the citizens of wherever this is are definitely enjoying the spoils.
The fact that my capital doubled in size means that I really have to completely re-design the LRT system there. I have already completely re-designed the LRT system right before I built these new 4 train lines, right before the population doubling.. But now there's so many new people, new density considerations, the city is more spread out, I think I really need to redesign my LRT lines so that everything is as efficient as possible. Most of my LRT lines throughout my transport empire are losing money, maybe 65-80% of them. My transport trucks always make me a nice amount of money, consistently, ever year. The trains fluctuate and some years make me a couple million, some years cost me a couple million. Overall each year I usually make anywhere between $2 mill to $12 mill, not including any vehicle purchase/replacement costs, which happen every couple years. My transport empire is basically an over-engineered public transportation experiment funded by resource and consumer good transportation profits. And now finally after so many years (it's now 2080 or something like that) the trains are now looking to perhaps become profitable themselves on a consistent basis. Next I am rebuilding the capital's LRT system from scratch and after that it's time to build the 2 relief lines from the 50 year plan (which has turned into a 100 year plan) It's a bright future ahead for whatever it's called transportation company
^Looks a bit strange. How is Turkey just a hybrid regime anyway? ^^
Also not sure why Spain/Germany/Uk/Austria supposedly have more democracy than Greece, France, Italy, Portugal, Cyprus? (also not sure why Finland is higher than the previous group?).
For starters the UK has first past the post, which itself is sort of against proportional/correct representation in parliament.
Also not sure how Turkey or even... Iraq (!) is better democratically than Russia. A bit politicized?
India also seems a bit surprising. Doesn't it still have casts in some way? (eg the "untouchables").
EDIT: nm, i just saw they have Syria as the worst thing ever, but Egypt is a far better place with its military dictatorship sentencing hundreds of people to death, ie mostly the same as Russia in the chart.
I mean, there is a source, so it's probably easy enough to figure out how they compiled the data for this map. I would assume they take into consideration a whole bunch of variables, and not just "at a first glance" type stuff like you're doing
I mean, there is a source, so it's probably easy enough to figure out how they compiled the data for this map. I would assume they take into consideration a whole bunch of variables, and not just "at a first glance" type stuff like you're doing
But you would say there is fault if someone claimed that fish can learn human languages, or would you wait to see the methodology leading to that conclusion? (quasi parallel) For in that case as well one might have twisted meanings enough (or presented trivial factors as poignant enough) to validate a somewhat absurd conclusion.
It's a composite index based on a lot of scores for diffferent things, and "trust in political institutions" type stuff is a significant divider between the dark green and medium green full democracies and the flawed ones.
Specifically these are the categories: Electoral process and pluralism, Functioning of Government, Political participation, Political culture, and Civil liberties.
Greece scores poorly for functioning of government and for participation in particular.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.