Altered Maps V: The Molotov-Threadentropp Pact

Status
Not open for further replies.
USSRDoesntFall.png


After the successful reforms of Gorbachev in the 1980s and 1990s, the USSR emerged as a capitalist, democratic superpower. Independence leaders were bargained with, with many being sated by autonomy as Gorbachev implemented American-inspired federalism(in particular a bicameral legislature to balance fears by minorities of Russian domination) to manage the diverse interests within the USSR.

With the era of superpower cooperation, great peace came to the world. While Gorbachev had made deals with Reagan to prevent the expansion of NATO, this occurred in a new form. NATO was pushed to the side as the Economic and Military Cooperation Organisation(EMCO) was founded, with all of NATO and the former Eastern Bloc unified into one global power.

The United States and USSR checked and balanced eachother, but they very often worked on the basis of cooperation, not competition. When the terrorist organisation Al-Qaeda and it's allies - usually of convenience - began to stage attacks in the Turkic Belt of the USSR, and even attacked several Russian monuments.

Al-Qaeda's justification was that the USSR was the greater of two evils, as it outright occupied Muslim lands, whereas the United States had merely stationed troops there. Al-Qaeda demanded the release of all the Muslim regions of the USSR, or more deaths would ensue.

When the United States supported the USSR and began to aid it's counter-terrorist efforts, Al-Qaeda planned against the Americans as well, eventually toppling the World Trade Center towers and attacking the Pentagon as retribution for intervention.

This cascaded into a massive retaliation, however, as nearly all of the Northern regions of the world(numerous Allied client states had also joined the alliance, such as those in Africa and the Middle East), bound in an alliance established for the purposes of peace and prosperity, attacked. Soviet forces, which had been primarily focusing on counter-terrorism, soon assaulted Afghanistan with the help of the rest of the coalition. The Soviets pulled their strings - having always had good ties with the developing world - to persuade the Islamic Republic of Iran to align with EMCO, and the Iranians provided some support in purging Afghanistan of radical Sunni influences.

However, Iran refused to be the Coalition's lapdog, strengthening ties with China after Coalition forces overran Iraq, with questionable evidence of weapons of mass destruction. The Coalition would use a coup - with Israeli assistance - to bring Syria into EMCO. Iran itself would later be invaded when it developed a weapons program, the USSR and the Coalition exhausting much of their population's willingness for war in the process.

However, as the Western Coalition used inefficent tactics based on technology - though the Eastern Coalition compensated as it brought sheer firepower on it's side - they ignored the real Red Menace: China.

The Chinese had been using the War on Terror as a means of strengthening themselves. While having a large market interest with the American and Soviet economies, it nonetheless knew it had to escape attachment from them. They strengthened alliances with numerous socialist leaders around the world, all of them having a common tendency to decry EMCO as the "Third Imperialism." The "ChiCom bloc" was the name commonly given to the informal alliance the Chinese crafted with most of the undeveloped world. American culture and the actions of the USA fed many pro-Chinese sentiments, while the actions of the Soviets in the Middle East(not to mention the fact the USSR had ignored it's client states when Gorbachev adopted a "USSR first" policy, allowing them to fall under Chinese influence instead) strengthened this alliance.

Before long, a new Cold War had emerged decades after the last one. The Chinese lacked the massive nuclear arsenal that had prevented the first Cold War going hot, but through economic power, they had a deterrent against any actions against them. Accordingly, a new term was coined: MADWE - Mutually Assured Destruction of the World Economy. China's cheap products would no longer fuel the luxurious lifestyle of the Westernised world, and the Westernised world would no longer fuel the Chinese economy.

The Second Cold War was proof that the sinews of war were in fact money.

In Purple: USSR
In Light Blue: USA
In Blue: EMCO
Red: China and it's formal alliance
Blue with Red Stripes: Areas under EMCO's influence and part of it, but with strong insurgency movements, many of whom are supplied by China.

Edit: Forgot to mark the Caribbean nations. I'm sure most would be in EMCO's sphere of influence, however.
 
I highly doubt Colombia or Argentina would join a formal Chinese alliance.
 
Whoops, made a few typos! The alliance is informal, and is mostly on a country-by-country basis, rather than a monolithic official bloc like EMCO.

I wasn't really sure how to group South American nations, but mostly ran on the idea current trends might have still occurred, such as Venezuela and Bolivia going anti-American in terms of foreign policy. Looking at the data, Colombia, Chile and Argentina should probably all be switched to the other sides, but who knows what the Chinese would craftily come up with in their pursuit of "socialism with x characteristics."
 
Altered2.png


I claim this as a reason marijuana should be legal/not legal, depending on your opinion of the outcome. Chances are this will hurt Obama politically.

Blue - USNA

Formed from the victory of the Marian Party in several elections, and the military and diplomatic policies that followed.

Red - Eurasian Republic(capital in Ulaanbaatar)

Formed from China and Russia, and numerous associates of the two. Distinguished by a lot of state control and regulation with a diverse, mixed economy.

Purple - European Empire(capital: Strasbourg)

Formed from the desperation of the Russo-European War, a dictatorship - and later a monarchy - was imposed upon the former EU, which eventually expanded across the Third World. As a result, the Empire has a mixture of Anglo-American, European, and Islamic values at the federal level.

Brown - Supreme Bolivarian Republic(capital in La Paz, Bolivia)

While much of South America experienced invasion from the USNA, states such as Venezuela and Bolivia led the charge in establishing Bolivarianism across the continent under the guise of the USSA. Before long, the SBR was formed, and the former states of South America stripped of national identity and independence.

Green - Neo-Caliphate (capital at Mecca)

Founded amidst the chaos of the world, and unified as Muslims saw increasing amounts of Islamic land fall to infidels. Operates a wide network of insurgencies across the world, and is the most efficient with the use of it's resources.

Uncolored - Disputed Areas/Minor nations
 
Why does the European Empire seem to include Kent?

I guess some pro-EU Britons joined up there... and the EE wanted to solidify control of the Chunnel and the Straits of Dover.

Good map Fox.

Thank you!

I'm going to take a guess and assume you feel American oversight(with all the Federal touches, i.e. England being it's own state) is preferable to EU oversight? :)
 
Thank you!

I'm going to take a guess and assume you feel American oversight(with all the Federal touches, i.e. England being it's own state) is preferable to EU oversight? :)

Ideally I would want to get run by our absolutist parliament. But if we were to be forced into global supra-national countries an American one is far more suitable.
 
How did the Arabs, Iranians, and Pakistanis conquer India?

How did the Americans conquer Eastern Russia? How did Russia conquer all of Eastern Europe? How did South America manage to stop the USA at the Panama Canal? ;)

The answer is quite simple, and can be inferred from the very first sentence of the post.
 
Shouldn't that be "Steve Irwin's Skeleton" or "Steve Irwin's Ghost"?
 
Weird map considering I'd have guessed a good third of Americans are named Johnson, Smith, Jones, Taylor, Brown, Williams or any similar names we hear daily on US TV shows.
Granted 10% of them are probably black... but I hardly believe any white guy with such a surname could deny his English ancestry. And even those who are black probably also have white ancestors... the opposite would be very sad after three centuries of coexistence in the country.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top Bottom