Ask a die hard dietitian

Hi Dusters, do you have any sort of certification? Not that I particular respect certification necessarily since I've seen supposedly officially certified dietitians offering ridiculous advice like that corn flakes + low fat milk is a healthy breakfast. Just curious.


I find I really can binge out on stuff like dried figs sometimes but that's just me & I have food issues.

A few questions.

What makes you certain the many meals spaced out is the best approach? For me it seems kind of like a pain in the neck & in my wannabe-self-sufficient frame of mind I tend to find the idea to eat so often a burden & would need proof to show me it's necessarily a superior way to eat. Also, when I eat often it's hard not to eat alot each time so I prefer just to eat 2-3 x a day. Also, there's the whole intermittent fasting thing (where rats simply do not eat at all every other day) which increases lifespan beyond even caloric restriction & seems to counter the constant-feeding approach (then again these rats probably don't do martial arts & are probably fairly inactive on their fasting days, of course most modern folks are also fairly inactive).

What frustrates me about diet is that are so many contradictory opinions & unlike in political/social thought where it's pretty easy to spot & disregard stupid arguments there seems to be evidence for different theories.

For example some seem to do well on low-fat diets whereas some argue that fat actually burns more efficiently than carbs once you can get your body used to using fat.

What seems logical to me is : lots of vegetables, especially greens (the science seems to support that green leafy & cruciforms veggies are good for health, reducing some cancers by half even), don't overeat, like you (dusters) said avoid heavily processed/stripped foods. I'd also add I don't tend to feel very good when consuming large amounts of vegetable oils. They are pretty much empty calories also though better than sugar. I do have some extra-virgin olive oil & flax oil & occasionally coconut oil but don't douse my salad too liberally (I used to use up to 16 tablespoons of oil in a huge salad).

I do find it amazing that we can put a man on the moon but people are still arguing over what macronutritent ratios are ideal for man/woman.

Thx for the thread. :)

Nope, no certificates. Self-study and research. Many meals - faster metabolism. The hassle with eating is to eat very slowly. Each spoonful, reconsider if you need it for your body or it is temptation to taste something sweet.

Well, oils are like 600+ calories per 100g, so use them very carefully. You can add water to salad to make it easier to ingest.

Junk food means unbalanced body usually. So less muscle mass, missing vitamins etc. You survive, but you linger as a walking dead if you eat junk food for long. (Walking dead - you can't lift your own weight or some general weight to mass ratio).

I don't actually monitor, however i pay visits to doc regularly to see if I haven't done something wrong. I do take anti-oxidant supplements sometimes.

Nutrionists are okay as long as they have a body to show as proof that their stuff works.

Raw milk, straight from the cow ;) Although I tend to get calcium from low-fat cheese and curd.
 
Is there a reason you're so obsessed over your diet? Speaking as a vegan it's not often I encounter someone else with whom I view as having an extreme diet.
 
Is there a reason you're so obsessed over your diet? Speaking as a vegan it's not often I encounter someone else with whom I view as having an extreme diet.

I'm a female. And I want 2 finger push ups. I believe the diet and training is the way to go.
 
For many, no milk at all is the best approach. Most Asians & Africans as well as a large percentage of Europeans aren't properly adapted to milk.

I got my full viking genes when it comes to milk :D
 
I'm not sure I understand the question. I don't do any math to see the offset. As for carbs - rice is great. For fiber, I eat oats a lot. Oats in cookies, oats with water, oats with jam.

Maybe you mean this quote? /Therefore, the grams of fiber are substracted from the grams of carbs to get the total negative carbs/. Of course you can do the math, but generally carbs are on the watch. You should be careful not to eat too much of them, whereas fiber is less risky.
 
My understanding is that if you have x grams of fiber in a serving, you can take away y grams of carbs. I've heard a couple different things, 1:1 and when there's more than 10 grams of fiber the number of grams over 10 offset the carbs. So if you have 15 grams a fiber and 15 grams of carbs you have a net of 10 grams. I don't know which one to use though.
 
Unless you have diabetes or similar I wouldnt suggest worrying about the numbers so much. Why do you think you need to offset your carbs? If you have signs of too much energy then I would suggest eating less carbs, or if you feel you need more carbs then eat more.

Im guilty of overeating and rushing my meals quite regularly. Sometimes I just need to sit back, enjoy my food and masticate; this way I get more from less.
 
Okay. I will post some links along :

Angiotensin converting enzyme loss causes faster metabolism: http://www.sciencealert.com.au/news/20082904-17241.html

Large people eat more, hard fact http://www.bbc.co.uk/sn/humanbody/truthaboutfood/slim/fatthin.shtml

Physical activity leads to faster metabolism
http://www.bbc.co.uk/health/treatments/healthy_living/your_weight/medical_myths.shtm

faster metabolism - not alone from meals
http://www.theiflife.com/eating-more-meals-does-not-speed-up-your-metabolism/

faster metabolism from 6 meals - a myth?
http://www.worldofdiets.com/meal-frequency-and-metabolism-a-big-myth/

You are open to make you own conclusions, Leifmk. :)
 
The hourglass is also a good example. Ones body can only digest so much at a time, so why overload?
200px-Wooden_hourglass_3.jpg
 
Unless you have diabetes or similar I wouldnt suggest worrying about the numbers so much. Why do you think you need to offset your carbs? If you have signs of too much energy then I would suggest eating less carbs, or if you feel you need more carbs then eat more.

Im guilty of overeating and rushing my meals quite regularly. Sometimes I just need to sit back, enjoy my food and masticate; this way I get more from less.

Being pre-diabetic the number of carbs I ingest is of great interest to me. My goal for offsetting carbs is not more fiber, it is more excercise/activity. But until I can get that activity up I'm cheating any way I can. I've already cut bread, rice and potatoes out of my diet, and put more fruit and vegetables in it. That change alone netted me a fifteen pound weight loss in about 3 weeks. Now that Spring is here, we're spending more time outdoors and that's helping too.
 
Being pre-diabetic the number of carbs I ingest is of great interest to me. My goal for offsetting carbs is not more fiber, it is more excercise/activity. But until I can get that activity up I'm cheating any way I can. I've already cut bread, rice and potatoes out of my diet, and put more fruit and vegetables in it. That change alone netted me a fifteen pound weight loss in about 3 weeks. Now that Spring is here, we're spending more time outdoors and that's helping too.

As for pre-diabetic, I strongly sugguest fructose instead of all sugars.
http://www.livestrong.com/article/82417-fructose-diabetes/

Even honey is too sweet, use it very little. You can get carbs from melons, oranges (ripe), watermelons, bananas etc. http://www.diabetes.org/food-and-fitness/food/planning-meals/carb-counting/
 
I am on a diet too, i walk for 2 km a day, in a kind of fast walking (takes me 30 min).

Also eat less. It pays off, although slowly...

Do you like in a city or the country or a small town away from a metro area?
 
As for pre-diabetic, I strongly sugguest fructose instead of all sugars.
http://www.livestrong.com/article/82417-fructose-diabetes/

Even honey is too sweet, use it very little. You can get carbs from melons, oranges (ripe), watermelons, bananas etc. http://www.diabetes.org/food-and-fitness/food/planning-meals/carb-counting/

I would avoid eating sweet fruits "for carbs". People easily get enough carbs each day, and really sweet fruits run the risk of being too 'empty' in calories (which sounds kinda funny in our HFCS world).

Cutting down white breads, pastas, rice, and potatoes is a really good way of limiting rapidly digesting carbs. That's the low-hanging-fruit. After that, if you're really trying to specialise, eating fruits/vegetables with a decent ratio of calories to fibre is a decent metric.
 
I would avoid eating sweet fruits "for carbs". People easily get enough carbs each day, and really sweet fruits run the risk of being too 'empty' in calories (which sounds kinda funny in our HFCS world).
It does sound a bit funny, most fruit has a pretty decent nutrient density profile compared to most other carbohydrate sources. Of course some are gonna be better than others, berries for instance.
 
Wait, what's wrong with sweet fruit now? I eat a lot of fruit, especially sweet fruit, because, well, it's sweet... I don't want to have to start eating crappy fruit :(
 
Sweet fruit >>> most other stuff in modern society, don't get me wrong.
We're talking super fine-tuning of one's diet once we start distinguishing between types of fruits. This is something most people wouldn't need to worry about, and they're very likely not over-ingesting sweet fruit. If it's in lieu of something crappier, then it's a good idea.
 
Back
Top Bottom