Zack
99% hot gas
well congratulations
You were included in the "new kids"
I'm in on a mislynch of Vote: Zack.
Yes, my vote was a joke. Not very funny but that's how I do it. Remember that it was early in the day.
Unvote: Vote: Cuthilius Consensus among those who have played more with you seem to be that you're scummy.
Yeah, what about no?
You're gunning incredibly hard for my right now, I can't really understand why.
I suddenly remember a Star Wars game where Pizza had a Sith avatar. What are you really doing Visor?
People were talking about me sone pages ago. I am consensusy by nature, I believe the town as a whole make a better judgement than I.
This is now the game with sixth most posts.
I agree that Visor seems to be up to something. If he's just having fun or if he's scum I can't tell.
Cuthillius is right, I'm lazy town, but I'm going to make a list (I've never done it before I believe). I've checked the post history of the people that haven't posted mush. It's not possible for those who have posted a lot, but I have skimmed through every post "continuously", so I can write down the general feeling I have for them.
Colour scale from towniest to scumiest: 1 2 3 4 5
Players that have posted less than me:
al sipsclar: Have troubles keeping up with the thread. Nothing
autolycus: Goes missing from time to time, nothing weird.
backwards logic: Didn't catch my joke but then posted a wall I agree with.
bsmith: Not much.
golden1knight: Nothing
newyn: Talks about bussing with Visor.
xym: Slippery.
The medium posters
jarrema: Pushed Arakhhor's lynch until the end.
sooh: Tries to be helpful.
cass_: Is helpfull.
takhisis: His normal roleplaying self.
The ones I don't have time to write something about
choxorn:
kingmorgan:
landlubber:
legato endless:
lohrenswald:
mat93:
murska:
The "Top Posters"
glossysushi: Posts a lot.
cuthilius: Respond by posting a lot.
lassie:
zack: Grumpy.
visorslash: Same as Zack.
Now I'm out of time, Vote: Cuthillius
Unvote: Vote: Lassie
It should be tied 7-7 between Arakhor and Lassie now (Arakhor reached it first)
2 hours left I believe.
Exactly my thought when I read the claim, it's very non-Pizzalike. But why even claim it? It would never result in less votes on him.
Vote: Mat93
Cuthullius would still be my first choice though.
Because the lynch at that point was either Lassie or Mat and I wasn't going to be around at the end of the day.
I tried to save Arakhor by voting for Lassie and yesterday I voted for Mat instead of Lassie. I regret it now, Vote: Lassie. The two close lynches should provide a decent amount of information.
Well, when looking at the mafia pwnage of the town, Zack and Choxorn is a likely scum team.
Probably Backwards Logic and BSmith as well...
Vote: Zack
I don't like that choxorn considered Al Sips a better lynch than Zack although he was unsure about the claim.
I don't like the Al Sips lynch at all, it was driven by the mafia in some form.
For now, Vote: Cass.
zack/glossy/cuthillius would have to be one of the most audacious scum teams in recent memory
Thanks!
Yea, get avatars you n00bs!
Uh, so why exactly are you in on a mislynch of Zack? Who says it's a mislynch? Seems a little too opportunistic to me, considering you just came out of nowhere to make the post. vote: Edse.
vote: Murska
While I'd pile on Lassie now due to his survive a lynch claim (that's not exactly a townie ability), I think we should at least get one additional wagon rolling to keep things interesting. Day two was a Visor wipeout that didn't add much in the way of genuine reactions. Murska's been defending Lassie all game in some capacity, so I'd like to see how the rest of the player base reacts in a tight vote.
I don't find Lassies claim very believable tbh, and if someone did get roleblocked I can imagine that it could well have been Lassie.
The vote is not tight Backwards, if anything you have made it looser by voting Murska
Lassie (6)
Cuth (2)
Al Sips (2)
Legato (1)
Mat93 (1)
Murska (1)
I do find your reasoning to be very fishy, why not Cuth or Sips - that would be tightening the Wagon and you may well get enough support for a completing lynch, as it is your vote seems factually correct but pretty useless, unless of course it's your intention to widen the field and spread the votes.
I can get behind a Lassie lynch very easily, but for now Vote:Al Sipsclar
Underlining mine.
I never said the vote was tight, just that I'd like to see it tight. If I wanted to widen the field I'd just vote Lassie and be done with it ala GoldenKnight.
Also, my reasoning is fishy, yet factually correct? How is that even possible?
Sorry for lack of posting. Real life has been busy with work and haven't had any time to sit down and dig into things. In fact, the hammer had been reached for Lassie before I even saw it.
I find it interesting the guy who posts a billion times a minute strongest lead is Visor's read on me back on day one. I'm not entirely sure what to make of this: on one hand he's clearly been active, but if that's the best he has what has he been doing? If he want to lynch me on my meta play of laying low as scum, fine, but at least say so and state that's his strongest lead. I almost get the sense he's trying to look townie with all of the posting/innocuous question asking but are too afraid to stick his own neck out on an original case. He uses a ton of hitchhiking Visor's reads to make his 'case.'
vote: glossy
Others I'd look at:
landlubber: his defense of me pinged me when others scoffed at my large post. Why defend me the way he has? Trying to grab fake townie points if/when I'm lynched? Also the reasoning for tacking onto the Lassie vote yesterday seemed very forced, like, "I'm bandwagoning here, but I better say something townie that doesn't look like I'm bandwagoning."
edse: Fake activity with the Zack post/accusation on D1 and really nothing more. Flinched on the Cuth accusation (post804), or could be read as forced distancing between the two.
Cuth: The flip-flopping votes with no reason and the 'oops I hammered' post. It only would have taken a quick second to count the Lassie votes, but instead carelessly voted Lassie to finish him off (he needed to vote, he says...). Zack already hit on it, but it's like your vote goes in whichever direction the wind is blowing. Post 1914 to me is interesting: States multiple of Auto/chox/murska/Lassie is scum, yet has not done anything since to dig further/push that line of reasoning. In fact, he's been suspicious of choxorn since at least post 1289, yet still there's no follow-up. That's a long time not to push a case. Are the bandwagon cases really better than your own reads?
My gut says one of Cuth/edse is scum, leaning more towards Cuth atm though could envision a scenario where both are.
Long day at work tomorrow, then perhaps I'll have time to follow up.
Did anyone else find this as scummy as I did? I'm still leaning glossy over him, but to just show up and vote on the new bandwagon of the day does not earn him any townie points in my book.
Here's the problem with the argument against me: It's all meta related. Yea, I tend to lurk as scum, but it has absolutely no bearing for this game. How have the meta arguments worked so far? Go ahead and lynch me if it gets rid of that lingering question a handful of you seem to have. You'll be painfully disappointed when I flip town.
My vote on you was not OMGUS, it is your play. You call out a bunch of people to make reads and push cases, and even now today it's "lynch one of these six or seven people." That's not town, that's misdirection. You haven't pushed any of them with anything convincing. You call choxorn out on making obvious statements, then go ahead and do it yourself. Then choxorn makes one post and suddenly everything is honky-dory. On top of it, you claim to be following along, yet how exactly do you miss that KM replaced Xym? This is the kind of thing scum miss - it doesn't impact them directly so it's a thought that gets neglected. Townies on the other hand have to make cases/leans on almost everyone, so a player change is something that's going to stick out. I'm only half following along due to time and I knew this.
How exactly is Zack town? He pushed a bunch of cases (sort of), they were all wrong, and now he's claiming he's taking a backseat now and letting others drive the cases. Assuming he's scum (and I'm leaning that he is - he's been wrong as town before and never took his foot off the gas like this), doesn't it make sense for another scum to start directing and driving the cases on other townies to take the focus off of Zack?
Vote: Zack. You don't do this as town.
I'm seeing a glossy/Zack/choxorn/murska connection right now, I'm getting scum vibes from landlubber, and the cass post that's somehow incriminated him seems to be glossy grasping at straws. I've made the "look at x player tomorrow" post as town. Hell, we all have - if this guy flips, then look this way. If not, look at these guys. It's how you play the game. So I find it highly suspicious and slightly hilarious when two of the more active posters grab onto something so trivial and run with it. Oh and why Murska?
Underlining mine. Unless Zack is scum? Obvious statement is obvious. And why the backpedaling on Zack? It's like you're hedging your bets in such a way that if Zack flips scum, you have an out (oops, I was deceived!). While we're calling people out on making trivial statements and Capt. Obvious posts, I'm assuming glossy will get around and make the post calling Murksa out as such. Oh wait...
Underling again mine. Don't lynch Zack, unless he's scum... WHAT?!?!
tl:dr
glossy/Zack/Murska/choxorn/ possibly landlubber. Start with the four, then we'll sort it out from there.
Okay. Right now I'm looking at a scum team of Legato, BL, and Cass. Thoughts?
You'd be sadly misguided.
Okay. Right now I'm looking at a scum team of Legato, BL, and Cass. Thoughts?
vote: Glossy.
Concocted the terrible lynch of Cass, along with everything else I stated in post 2177. Teammates with Zack, KM, Murska, and Cuth - just look at the voting patterns. Lynch right down the line and we'll have this still. KM for defending Zack/finishing off Cass, Cuth for agreeing with glossy on anything and everything, and Murska for the connections with glossy. And if you still don't believe me on Zack:
Originally Posted by Zack View Post
Disagree. Makes no sense for scum to make such a concerted, in-depth case against me. Why would scum want to lynch Zack? They obviously want me alive, I keep lynching townies. I really doubt a scumbag comes after me like that, when they're under no pressure and I haven't given them any heat. A (misguided) townie frustrated with leadership made post #2177.
Underlining mine. I went from scum fodder to "save" someone to what amounts to being a confirmed townie in one post.
One of Newyn and Visor is probably scum?
Alright.
What are your thoughts so far?
Sensing the winds of change and sliding into a more popular opinion? Visor's been pretty consistent, I'd like more of an explanation on what exactly changed your view of him that's more in-depth than "it's not scummy anymore". Especially with that opening line, good morning pleasant and intelligent associate sirs, seems like you're trying hard to get on the good side of the most active posters.
Vote: landlubber
Or a less stupidly vague question - gun to your head, who do you vote for right now?
Some of those votes seemed opportunistic. Let me go dig them up.
I particularly hated the Murska, Al Sips, Cuthilius, and landlubber votes on you.
Murska is shaping up, though, so I think she actually sincerely believes you're scum.
Good morning friends.
unvote: Visor. His behavior isn't at all scummy to me anymore.
I somewhat disagree with the apparent consensus about BL. The post struck me as slightly odd, but BL's the type to always want to be a little unpredictable. Lynching him this early on would be a mistake.
I'm feeling worst about Al Sips. Call it slightly hypocritical of me, but his vote on Visor feels way too contrived. vote:Al Sips
You think I'd really consistently lynch all the other top posters and implicate myself as scum? Heck no. I'm smarter than that.
I've just been playing terribly. Quite.
He buddied with BL a bit the next day and then said about Cuthillius's suspicion of a BL/Legato/Cass scum team "That's arguably the strangest scum hypothesis in the thread. I don't have the foggiest how that's even supposed to work." He didn't offer much else on this, though. He said "BL is obvious town" about one of his posts but on the other hand, you did the same.
I would say that Legato is certainly the most likely to be #4 if BL/landlubber/edse are the first 3, and the least likely to be #4 if the first 3 are Cuth/Glossy/Zack.
I'm really not liking this bandwagon on Glossy. Assuming I'm right that 4/11 players are scum, the mafia very much want to try to get a bandwagon forming so they can hammer and get the mislynch they need to win; being that hasty to vote probably isn't a good move for town or it's just a scum play. We need to be careful about piling votes onto someone.