I think this is a false dilemma. God exists outside of time, so He can see what we will choose, and act to prevent or change or allow it before we choose to do so. I personally don't see a contradiction between omniscience and free will.If Christians believe in free will, they ultimately believe in a paradox. If God created the universe, with complete foreknowledge of what would result, then ultimately the universe acts according to a purpose that he designed. In that case there can be no free will.
Therefore, to the Christian, the question of fate comes down to a question of how much God controls.
Can Free Will Possibly Exist?
If Christians believe in free will, they ultimately believe in a paradox. If God created the universe, with complete foreknowledge of what would result, then ultimately the universe acts according to a purpose that he designed. In that case there can be no free will.
Therefore, to the Christian, the question of fate comes down to a question of how much God controls.
So, the fact that chemical processes can occur seemingly at random necessarily means we have free will? That's not logically inferred.
No, but pretty much every reconciliation between the two involves nondeterminism. It's fair to say that if they ever are reconciled, (and the few points where they do overlap within current theory) are going to be nondetermininistic.Bill, you're referencing both QM and GR in this thread, in order to make a point. However, they're contradictory theories and haven't been properly reconciled ...
I think this is a false dilemma. God exists outside of time, so He can see what we will choose, and act to prevent or change or allow it before we choose to do so. I personally don't see a contradiction between omniscience and free will.
You're very right, it's not inferred from QM. Because even if we allow for that, it still doesn't mean that "you" are more incharge of yourself than these randomly affected electrons and protons. There's no evidence that you're controlling the universe at such a fine-grained level.
An electron that you didn't decide to wobble just triggered a protein in a neuron in such a way that you'll forget this post of mine faster that you could have. This means that your future self will act differently than if that electron had wobbled a different way.
So, the fact that chemical processes can occur seemingly at random necessarily means we have free will? That's not logically inferred.
Huh?Illusion is reality. Everything that isn't part of our personal reality isn't real imo. So definitely free will exists.
His point was that it's not a conflict between free will and determinism, but between free will and chance.
Brighteye said:I believe in free will. I think that there are bigger problems than Christian paradoxes though, if one doesn't believe in free will.
But the fact that God created the universe means that the way he created it set it into motion according to his own foresight. That would mean that whatever we do now was part of God's plan from the very beginning.
Tons of problems have been discussed in the "Ask a Theologian" thread!Bigger problems? I'd like to hear your theories.
Problem of evil...Bigger problems? I'd like to hear your theories.![]()
To a Christian like me, it becomes eternally important.
Exactly. The way the universe works seems to involve very little human interference.
Doesn't really follow. Deism is a consistent claim, so you can't really say that God necessarily had a plan for the universe other than creating it. As well, if God does have a plan for the universe, it doesn't mean that he has a plan for every single thing in reality - it could just mean that he has an ultimate goal for reality, which he could bring by modifying it over time to correct it to what he wants to rather than having initial conditions.
Bill3000 said:Of course, the problem is that claiming that something outside of spacetime is ultimately saying something akin to saying that such an object doesn't exist. If god existed, he'd probably be fuddling with the parameters of reality, rather than creating the concept of the parameters himself. But that's just my empiricism coming out here.
Bill3000 said:Tons of problems have been discussed in the "Ask a Theologian" thread!
Problem of evil...
Perfection said:Also
54321!
![]()
For a Christian, isn't a lack of free will a bad thing?
Why?