Casey Anthony found Not Guilty

did the jury reach a conclusion about her burying the kid or is "the killer" still out there, like with OJ?
The jury only reached the conclusion that the prosecution did not prove its case beyond a reasonable doubt. Personally, I think that Casey Anthony did it, but that the prosecution botched the case (or at least the opportunity to get a plea bargain). Your question is similar to that being asked by lawyers/pundits not to be named, even though they should and do know better.
 
This was a waste or airspace. I thought this tweet was funny though

andylevy Andy Levy
RT @HaHaWhitePPL So was Nicole Brown family when your dad got OJ off RT @KimKardashian Casey Anthony not guilty! I am speechless!
 
ugh, I broke down and did some reading about the case. Maybe I shouldn't have, now I got more questions.

from a yahoo article

The lack of evidence and the doubt raised by the defense — that Caylee accidentally drowned in the family's pool — was enough to win an acquittal. After a trial of a month and a half, the jury took less than 11 hours to find Anthony not guilty of first-degree murder, aggravated manslaughter and aggravated child abuse.

She was convicted only of four misdemeanor counts of lying to investigators who were looking into the June 2008 disappearance of Caylee. She lied about being employed at Universal Studios. She lied about leaving Caylee with a baby-sitter, then again when she recounted to investigators that she had told two imaginary people that Caylee was missing. She also lied about receiving a phone call from Caylee the day before she was reported missing.

Okay, if the defense is suggesting the kid drowned in the family pool, who buried her? Wouldn't that be telling the jury the defendant buried her kid and didn't tell anyone for several months? I figured the jury knew that and still acquitted her of the serious crimes while convicting her of lying about covering up the kid's accidental death.
 
I'm not surprised she wasn't found guilty. AFAIK there wasn't any evidence to show that she was definitely guilty. Her lying to the cops was extremely suspicious, but perjury doesn't translate into proven guilt any more than exercising your 5th Amendment rights does. I personally do think she killed her kid, but not that the evidence presented in court proved such.
 
Let's not start with the OJ comparisons just yet. She still has to search for "the real killers" in hotels across the world, and then write a book about how she would have done it if she did it.
 
Let's not start with the OJ comparisons just yet. She still has to search for "the real killers" in hotels across the world, and then write a book about how she would have done it if she did it.

And then go after people who stole her memorabilia.
 
Ultimately I'm happy with the verdicts. From what I've been reading about the case as it's been going on, I'd have voted the same if I were a juror.

If her and her family's decisions and dysfunction were on trial, yeah she'd be guilty. But you can't convict on murder charges because of their decisions and dysfunction. There was just no evidence beyond circumstantial, and I think the prosecution knew that.

I'm not saying I'm convinced she didn't do it, but in this country I don't have to be convinced she's innocent. I have to be convinced she guilty, and I definitely was not. So right now I take the stance that she's innocent, as determined by a jury of her peers. I can't go by gut feelings or her strange behavior or her family's dysfunction; those are simply not evidence of murder.

I would also much rather see a guilty person go free than an innocent person get wrongly convicted, which does influence how I treat or see cases like this.
 
Found a good writeup about the whole thing

Casey Anthony was acquitted today of both murder and manslaughter charges, thus concluding the highly publicized and emotionally charged trial concerning the death of her 2-year old daughter. This outcome is both outrageous and satisfying.

The outrage is pretty easy to understand judging by most any social media feed. People all over Facebook and Twitter feel young Caylee Marie Anthony was not properly avenged because now no one will be held accountable for the atrocities she endured. Further, the popular perception was that the conviction of Caylee’s mom was a slam dunk. That’s certainly how the media portrayed it. And it was certainly my personal expectation as well. From the news reports and analysis I wasn’t certain they’d get a Murder 1 conviction, but manslaughter seemed a sure thing. In this respect, there’s a feeling that a guilty person is walking away.

But maybe in its own curious way, this can be viewed as a satisfying outcome. By all accounts, it seems the justice system worked the way it should. The difficult thing to keep in mind is that “the way it should” isn’t the same thing as “the way I wanted”.

Anthony was convicted in the court of public opinion long before the trial started. Despite this, and all the TV cameras rolling in the courtroom, a jury of her peers deliberated the evidence presented and unanimously decided there was reasonable doubt. That was not the easy decision. It certainly wasn’t the popular or expected decision. However, our judicial system is founded on the idea that 1000 guilty people should go free rather than a single innocent person be convicted. Doubt, any doubt, about the certainty of guilt, is supposed to be a reason for acquittal.

Keep in mind, this was not a celebrity trial. Anthony didn’t buy a dream team of lawyers, and she didn’t get off on any legal technicality. She didn’t prey on the emotions of the jury because of her stardom; she had none. Instead, she came off cold, aloof, and decidedly unsympathetic.

Still, with all that against her, 12 people unanimously decided there was reasonable doubt. Please pause and give that word its due weight. Unanimously. This was not a case where one or two bleeding hearts couldn’t be persuaded. They all agreed. Furthermore, they agreed to bear the probable scorn of those who had convicted her from their living rooms. They agreed to go home and face their family and friends, and explain ad nauseum, why they did what they did. They agreed to not take the easy way out.

And this, whether you like the outcome or not, is how our system is supposed to work. It’s not about vengeance or spleen venting. It’s not about emotion or empathy. It’s not about popular opinion. It’s about truth and justice… the American way.
 
ugh, I broke down and did some reading about the case. Maybe I shouldn't have, now I got more questions.

from a yahoo article

Okay, if the defense is suggesting the kid drowned in the family pool, who buried her? Wouldn't that be telling the jury the defendant buried her kid and didn't tell anyone for several months? I figured the jury knew that and still acquitted her of the serious crimes while convicting her of lying about covering up the kid's accidental death.

The case went from neglect to felony. However there have been too many coverups and lapses of time consistent enough for a case. The defendent seems to be a pathological liar and her family may be that way also. The "facts" in this case are not there in a logical way. Neglect may have convinced the jury, but felony by association did not.
 
Why all the hate for circumstancial evidence? Circumstancial evidence is usally what secures a conviction in a criminal case?
 
I like the write up that Warpus posted. As I've had more time to think about it, I've come to the conclusion that this was for the best. Even if I personally believe she is guilty, this is not a violent serial killer or a child molester who is going to go out and strike again. IF she is guilty, she knows it and will have to live with that knowledge for the rest of her life. And now the state of Florida's taxpayers are not responsible for her room and board until she dies. All in all I feel pretty good about it in retrospect. I still think she did it, but there IS some doubt, and it benefits everyone to not have her in prison. I do feel emotionally that Caylee is not getting the justice she deserves, but my logical brain is starting to seize control and remind me that Caylee is dead and is therefore past the point of caring about any of this. It may sound crass but I'll stand by it.
 
She died 3 years ago.

After reading through the case I pretty much agree with the jury here. I have no idea what happened to Caylee, but it isn't certain that she was killed by her mom. The thought of it still scares me though. Top 3 nightmares right there.
 
It is certain she was killed by her mom (who else would kill her). She's a murdering (word I can't use here). It's just there wasn't enough evidence to convict her.

The sad fact is that it isn't hard to get away with murder. And even a dimwitted person like Casey was able to do it. There are some crimes that just can't be proven.
 
I like the write up that Warpus posted. As I've had more time to think about it, I've come to the conclusion that this was for the best. Even if I personally believe she is guilty, this is not a violent serial killer or a child molester who is going to go out and strike again. IF she is guilty, she knows it and will have to live with that knowledge for the rest of her life. And now the state of Florida's taxpayers are not responsible for her room and board until she dies. All in all I feel pretty good about it in retrospect. I still think she did it, but there IS some doubt, and it benefits everyone to not have her in prison. I do feel emotionally that Caylee is not getting the justice she deserves, but my logical brain is starting to seize control and remind me that Caylee is dead and is therefore past the point of caring about any of this. It may sound crass but I'll stand by it.

In a way I agree with you. It's not like Casey will ever kill again. She poses no risk to society. So may as well let her walk free.

I just hope the court of public opinion damns her for the rest of her life. I would love to see her harassed wherever she goes. And I hope no one gives her a book or tv deal. I will be so pissed then.
 
If that happens just be the better person and ignore it, I know I will. And in a way, it is going to haunt her forever. Every time she applies for a job or anything like that, this case is going to turn up to bite her in the ass again. Hopefully she will be able to find an employer who is willing to look past that and give her a chance so that she can become a functioning, tax paying member of society again.
 
If I were in her shoes, I would bank money while the banking is good (I hear the networks are offering nice payouts for interviews). Ordinary employment is going to be a challenge so she needs to get ahead of the curve. She may be able to marry her way out of financial difficulty too.
 
Back
Top Bottom