tjs282
Stone \ Cold / Fish
If you routinely have AccProd switched on, then (regardless of what the upgrade gold-to-shield ratio is set at) all upgrades will be half the 'real' price -- because AccProd halves all the shield-costs.
Did not know that...If you routinely have AccProd switched on, then (regardless of what the upgrade gold-to-shield ratio is set at) all upgrades will be half the 'real' price -- because AccProd halves all the shield-costs.
CCM3 is moving on nicely, too. There are to do some small adjustments in the time scale and two civilopedia entries for governments (no big work). I am mainly waiting for the next official version of the Flintlock mod, as at present CCM 3 is running with the not official R17 preview 2 version of the Flintlock mod.Any ETA on CCM3? LK171 moving nicely, and I hope LK172 will be CCM3.
Any ETA on CCM3? LK171 moving nicely, and I hope LK172 will be CCM3.
Soon (TM)CCM3 is moving on nicely, too. There are to do some small adjustments in the time scale and two civilopedia entries for governments (no big work). I am mainly waiting for the next official version of the Flintlock mod, as at present CCM 3 is running with the not official R17 preview 2 version of the Flintlock mod.
At present I play a very interesting test game with CCM 3 where all settings concerning CCM 3 are running well. There are some smaller graphical problems with the new naval retreat settings in the Flintlock R17 preview 2 mod, that I have posted in the forum of the Flintlock mod. And I am eagerly waiting for the new era specific settings of the names of civilizations and their era specific rulers, that Flintlock is working on for the next version of his brilliant mod.
Soon (TM)
![]()
Well, then I guess I'll have some updating to doOzy, thank you very much for this nice advertisment about CCM 2.5, but I think that soon it will be wrong, when CCM 3 is appearing.
If you have a look into the thread of the Flintlock mod, you can see that Flintlock is planning to release soon the R17 preview 3 version of his mod with era specific civ names and leader names - what can be very good for CCM, as I hope now the era specific leaders in CCM can receive their real names.![]()
Since your wall is not allowing comments.. Happy Birthday!Cheburashka_1... Welcome to Civfanatics
I am certain you will have Good Times here. Members are Helpful and Friendly as you can see from tjs282.
... and there are Many Great Games that have been made from Civ III Conquests to play as well![]()
@timerover51 I was catching up on CCM updates and saw that you have a MacBook Pro. I have Civ 3 (Windows version) running great on my M2 MacBook Air using the free Porting Kit app. Might be something worth looking into. Late game especially will be A LOT faster.Now trying it with my Macbook Pro. Download speed is around 775 kilobytes per second, so the estimate is one hour and thirty-eight minutes. It looks like it is the Internet connection speed. Such is life.
It is a great honour, that you want to try CCM 3 in your next succession game and it is surely a great help in improving that mod.@Civinator - how is CCM 3.0 coming along?
LK171 is moving along nicely, and I want LK172 to be "trying CCM3.0".
Yes, I will do this.Civinator, when you start a new thread for CCM3 will you mention it here?
The next step for Flintlock, change the aggression level as the Era leader changes. Also, $80,758 gold? Daddy Warbucks!The new options in the R17 Preview 3 version of the Flintlock mod add a lot of flavour to CCM. In my current testgame with CCM 3 the change in names worked very well in the diplomacy screen. Here you can see a screenshot of all civs (but Arabia, which is in era 2) in era 1 in 750 AD with their civ and leader names (per example Emperor Julius Caesar of Rome) and in the next screenshot most of these civs in era 2, showing Duke Lorenzo de Medici from the Italian city-states. The time of abstract leader names like Ruler (Fra.), Ruler (Rus.) or Ruler (Ger.) in CCM is over.It is a pitty that some colours of the civ texts on the marple diplomacy screen are looking somewhat pale (per example the text for the USA in era 2). I will have a try if they look better on the "sandstorm background" of standard Civ 3.
View attachment 688939