According to this thread here, there's a new article about CivV out: http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=355693
The leaders and civilizations confirmed in that list are:
and also it reveals that the Incas are probably in, too
According to this thread here, there's a new article about CivV out: http://forums.civfanatics.com/showthread.php?t=355693
The leaders and civilizations confirmed in that list are:
I wouldn't discount the possibility of Ethiopia as the African civ. They were in BTS, and historically they were the only part of Africa that managed to remain uncolonized. Though the Zulus are still much more probable.
I wouldn't discount the possibility of Ethiopia as the African civ. They were in BTS, and historically they were the only part of Africa that managed to remain uncolonized..
Yeah, added Ethiopia to the list. I think Zulus and Mali have a better chance, since they were in vanilla versions of the previous civ games, especially the Zulus... but we'll see.
Does it count as colonization if the white man's not doing it?That's a product of colonization.
Does it count as colonization if the white man's not doing it?
Oh goody, we can keep Liberia out of that nasty group of exploitative colonizers.Was Liberia was promised to the African-Americans by God, or was it always an inseparable part of African-America from time immemorial? If neither, then yes, it's colonization.
It was the white man doing it, to get the blacks out of his country.Does it count as colonization if the white man's not doing it?
Confirmed/Almost-confirmed civs (i.e. either civilization or their leader confirmed):
Aztec (Montezuma?)
Inca (Pachacuti or Huayna Capac?)
the only bad thing is the one-leader rule.
we know that nearly 10-13 of the civs are confirmed so we still have some space and we will wonder who they will be.If the Incas are in, i would not count the Aztecs as in.
The image on the firaxis civ5 page could be just artwork.