Raisin Bran
Cereal Killer
good thing cuz finally I wont have access to the game for the next 2 days!
Civ4 Warlords - OT game?
- Thread starter IglooDame
- Start date
- Status
RB, are you going to be able to play a turn by 6AM EST Thursday the 4th? Because if I bring the game up tomorrow at 6AM (as currently planned) that's when the next turn will be done.
ComradeDavo
Formerly God
Game tommorow please...
ybbor
Will not change his avata
btw (and I know I'll regret saying this...), i just got warlords for Xhristmas, so if anyone's going to need a sub, I'd be willuing to help out 
Raisin Bran
Cereal Killer
Its all ok Igloodude. Ill be back home tonight and im going to be ablemy turns starting tonight !
All is well.
The game is back up. Whoever gets back in there first to run a turn, please post in the thread so I know all is well (I have no way to test access, at the moment).
Raisin Bran
Cereal Killer
I just logged in and everything is fine! 
WE ARE BACK!
WE ARE BACK!
It has just been asked of me whether doublemoves are prohibited (as noted in the rules here pre-edit) or allowed (as later noted here). Going by that, they're currently allowed.
Shane's proposed amendment seems a good one to me, that doublemoves are allowed in all cases except when accompanied by a declaration of war. Can we have a show of hands, thumbs-up or thumbs-down?
In favor of the amendment (i.e. doublemoves allowed except with war declaration):
Azza, ID, RB, Kan, VRWC, HAK, BCLG, Matrix
Opposed (i.e. doublemoves 100% allowed without restriction):
-
With eight of fourteen players responding yes, the amendment to the rule passes.
Shane's proposed amendment seems a good one to me, that doublemoves are allowed in all cases except when accompanied by a declaration of war. Can we have a show of hands, thumbs-up or thumbs-down?
In favor of the amendment (i.e. doublemoves allowed except with war declaration):
Azza, ID, RB, Kan, VRWC, HAK, BCLG, Matrix
Opposed (i.e. doublemoves 100% allowed without restriction):
-
With eight of fourteen players responding yes, the amendment to the rule passes.
azzaman333
meh
I like it.
Raisin Bran
Cereal Killer
In favor of the amendement 
Kan' Sharuminar
Fluffy
I'm for it
What about double moving during an actual war though, out of interest?
What about double moving during an actual war though, out of interest?
I'm for it
What about double moving during an actual war though, out of interest?
That would still be allowed, under the amendment. It would just be that a player won't move and on his next turn find that he is at war with someone and they've taken two moves since his last turn. Once both players know they're at war with each other, they can doublemove as much as they want.
azzaman333
meh
I'm for it
What about double moving during an actual war though, out of interest?
Allowed .
Kan' Sharuminar
Fluffy
HitAnyKey
Lunatic
I'll also accept that rule of course, since you alreadyknow I don't like double-moves period. 
So you're in favor of the amendment, I take it?
- Status
